The Truth About Ron Paul - Part 2

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Anything is possible. Ron Paul has more support this year than ever before. This includes support amongst his party. Either way, he will run as an independent regardless, and I will vote for him.

I just filled out the volunteer form for his campaign, so I'll help as much as I can in order to make it happen ;)
He should run as an Independent from the start...Repukes will not give him the go over Romney or Michele...I don't really think he wants to be POTUS ( can you blame him )..He just wants a chance to have his message heard...you have to see that.
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
He should run as an Independent from the start...Repukes will not give him the go over Romney or Michele...I don't really think he wants to be POTUS ( can you blame him )..He just wants a chance to have his message heard...you have to see that.
Whilst I don't disagree with you on the fact of him wanting his message heard, he also wants to be president. In history, no independent has ever been elected president, he has hopes that with the changing culture today that he might actually have a chance at getting the nomination.

First off, both of those candidates will lose to Barrack Obama, and even if they don't, god (fictional) help us all.

Why are you so quick to give up hope simply, because someone is not likely to win? Why is the American public such farewell followers when it comes to politicians. Will this mentality ever help us actually improve our country?

Keep in mind Ron Paul's fundraising power. He has loyal support that of which the only other candidate in the Republican Party can say (Palin). Money can go a long way when spent correctly.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He should (and Has) run as a Libertarian, but only Dems or Repubs can win these days.
i think the right person could manage to get 35% and split the r/d to 33% each. ross perot did quite well in 1992, but he was not the right guy. perhaps ron or rand paul could be that spoiler.

i don't think so, but they could be. ya never know.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Presidents never get impeached, its a empty threat. You might get threatened with it if you step out on your wife and have sex with other loose women, Remove members of your cabinet or cover up a crime. But Presidents don't ACTUALLY get impeached ever.
 

Medical Grade

Well-Known Member
Just found a random poll on my local news station:

Who is your pick for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination? Choice Votes Percentage of 5,613 Votes Mitt Romney 1,206
21%
Sarah Palin 859
15%
Tim Pawlenty 158
3%
Michelle Bachmann 406
7%
Ron Paul 1,760
31%
Rick Santorum 73
1%
Newt Gingrich 306
5%
Herman Cain 689
12%
Jon Huntsman 98
2%
Gary Johnson 48
1%
Thad McCotter 10
0%
close window
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
Anything is possible. Ron Paul has more support this year than ever before. This includes support amongst his party. Either way, he will run as an independent regardless, and I will vote for him.

I just filled out the volunteer form for his campaign, so I'll help as much as I can in order to make it happen ;)
How do I volunteer?
 

sync0s

Well-Known Member
Presidents never get impeached, its a empty threat. You might get threatened with it if you step out on your wife and have sex with other loose women, Remove members of your cabinet or cover up a crime. But Presidents don't ACTUALLY get impeached ever.
What about Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton?

beardo said:
How do I volunteer?


Fill out the form on ronpaul2012.com and they will contact you.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
What about Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton?
They weren't impeached, no president has ever been impeached. oh sure impeachment proceedings have started but always fall short of the congressional votes necessary to actually do the deed. Nixon would have probably been impeached if he hadn't resigned first.
 

beardo

Well-Known Member
The Republicans seem to be so politically narrow minded they would rather get behind a candidate who will lose but who's official policy is more in line with their agenda than unite to nominate Ron Paul and win the white house and help our country and it's citizens.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Just found a random poll on my local news station:

Who is your pick for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination? Choice Votes Percentage of 5,613 Votes Mitt Romney 1,206
21%
Sarah Palin 859
15%
Tim Pawlenty 158
3%
Michelle Bachmann 406
7%
Ron Paul 1,760
31%
Rick Santorum 73
1%
Newt Gingrich 306
5%
Herman Cain 689
12%
Jon Huntsman 98
2%
Gary Johnson 48
1%
Thad McCotter 10
0%
close window
so, you want us to believe your poll, which lacks all citation whatsoever, over the continuous polling that STILL shows ron paul at about 7%?

SNARK!

i do believe that is what is termed "steer manure", or colloquially put, "bullshit".

hahahahahahahaha!
 

budlover13

King Tut
Polls are polls UB. i've seen many lately with vastly different results. Like the CNN online poll that showed RP with a HUGE majority of the votes(i won't name a % because i don't know off the top of my head) but then they take a poll with 54 selected respondents and air that poll instead which obviously was not favorable to RP(showed 0% i believe).
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Polls are polls UB. i've seen many lately with vastly different results. Like the CNN online poll that showed RP with a HUGE majority of the votes(i won't name a % because i don't know off the top of my head) but then they take a poll with 54 selected respondents and air that poll instead which obviously was not favorable to RP(showed 0% i believe).
imagine that.

when ron paul cultists flood the online polls, he gets an unrealistic result in the 70% and above range.

and when polling firms conduct actual, randomized polling, he consistently scores in the 7% range.

and you can't understand the difference :lol:

i think you may need to wake up, and open you eyes :razz:
 

budlover13

King Tut
imagine that.

when ron paul cultists flood the online polls, he gets an unrealistic result in the 70% and above range.

and when polling firms conduct actual, randomized polling, he consistently scores in the 7% range.

and you can't understand the difference :lol:

i think you may need to wake up, and open you eyes :razz:
Just gotta tell more people about his truth. Polls are rarely independent but i must admit that his name recognition is not great but IS increasing. Still say that i support no other politician because they are all the same status quo bitches. He may not be the PERFECT candidate but he beats the hell outta the rest of the assholes.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Just gotta tell more people about his truth. Polls are rarely independent but i must admit that his name recognition is not great but IS increasing. Still say that i support no other politician because they are all the same status quo bitches. He may not be the PERFECT candidate but he beats the hell outta the rest of the assholes.
just don't slit your wrists or anything when he finishes in a 3-way tie for fourth.
 
Top