Exactly, but some people feel that those laws were not in effect on 9/11.Newton's Laws
Exactly, but some people feel that those laws were not in effect on 9/11.Newton's Laws
no its got more to do with surface area that jumper had arms and legs spread out like skydivers making a larger suface areaSorry charlie, wind resistance doesn't decrease with mass. That's pretty easily proved so I won't even try.
i dont think there is any need for the building to stop at every floor on the way down. considering the forces its not surprising that no momentum was lost after first collapseI think the point he was trying to make was that if each floor collapsed individually there would have been some delay in the way the building fell as each floow sucessively fell on each other
Ok. haha Either the entire building collapsed at one time or each floor successively gave away right? can we at least agree on that? and that it started from the upper portion of the building?i dont think there is any need for the building to stop at every floor on the way down. considering the forces its not surprising that no momentum was lost after first collapse
HAHA that is funny, Im envisioning a Wile E Coyote moment where he steps off the cliff for a few seconds before realizing he's fucked, then pulls out a goodbye sign and THEN he starts falling. I don't think the floors would stop the impending collapse, but they sure as hell would slow it down some. At least enough for more than a 2 second delay for the top to be on the ground, don't you agree that it seems a bit odd that 80% of the building presented no more resistance than an egg shell? I mean these buildings got their strength from the CORE, you could remove 100% of all the walls in the building and it would still stay upright.i dont think there is any need for the building to stop at every floor on the way down. considering the forces its not surprising that no momentum was lost after first collapse
I know Jesus. People Cant seem to get a grip on the fact that if the building collapsed the way the government said that it did, things like inertia and gravity and drag would have made the collapse look a whole lot different. I dont claim to have any answers onto what actually happened, but unless that plane was carrying nothing but jet fuel and every drop made it onto supporting beams the building wouldnt just fall on itself at near terminal velocity speedsHAHA that is funny, Im envisioning a Wile E Coyote moment where he steps off the cliff for a few seconds before realizing he's fucked, then pulls out a goodbye sign and THEN he starts falling. I don't think the floors would stop the impending collapse, but they sure as hell would slow it down some. At least enough for more than a 2 second delay for the top to be on the ground, don't you agree that it seems a bit odd that 80% of the building presented no more resistance than an egg shell?
I would agree with this, but the difference is staggering. the building has wind resistance too you know, those giant flat parts present quite a challenge to aerodynamic efficiencies. Of course if all those flat parts are first blown into smaller pieces than it isn't such a problem. Prove this to your self by getting a 5'x5' piece of sheet metal, throw it off the nearest tall thing and see how it reacts. Now cut that same sheet metal into 10 equally sized squares and roll them into cylinders. now throw them from the nearest tall thing. see the difference? Now take those cylinders and another 5x5 sheet of metal and throw them all off the nearest tall thing and see which one gets to the ground first. Depending on how you drop the sheet you could potentially get the sheet to the ground at the same time as the cylinders, but it will never get there first.no its got more to do with surface area that jumper had arms and legs spread out like skydivers making a larger suface area
Who me nah? It happens want me to apologize for my spelling or something?he must have me on ignore.
an egg shell has quite alot of strength and when it breaks it breaks catastrophically... i think its fits pretty well with the building after the first collapse the force was too much and it shattered like an egg...HAHA that is funny, Im envisioning a Wile E Coyote moment where he steps off the cliff for a few seconds before realizing he's fucked, then pulls out a goodbye sign and THEN he starts falling. I don't think the floors would stop the impending collapse, but they sure as hell would slow it down some. At least enough for more than a 2 second delay for the top to be on the ground, don't you agree that it seems a bit odd that 80% of the building presented no more resistance than an egg shell? I mean these buildings got their strength from the CORE, you could remove 100% of all the walls in the building and it would still stay upright.
yeah sounds about rightOk. haha Either the entire building collapsed at one time or each floor successively gave away right? can we at least agree on that? and that it started from the upper portion of the building?
The final picture is where the center column of the building was built on the bedrock. and that is what bedrock looks like guy.http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/09/23/article-0-02C2ECC500000578-922_468x703.jpg[/IMG]
Does that look melted to you? It doesn't take the cone shape that a explosive device would have made.
There are many many questions and so few answers.
bedrock has huge holes in it? Amazing. Aren't you the person who said that Architects design buildings to collapse in on themselves?The final picture is where the center column of the building was built on the bedrock. and that is what bedrock looks like guy.
that's your theory?I made a claim of superior knowledge? Really? I don't suppose you could quote that claim for me could you?
What??????that's your theory?