What's the difference between "protecting us" from "terrorism" and protecting us from disease or other health related issues?
One actively eliminates people, the other saves lives, yet the former is regarded as a "right" but the latter is not?
I think health care should be a right for a couple of reasons. One, I believe we prioritize our finances completely backwards, and two, because the average citizen cannot cover today's medical costs. Ex. I just got a physical, that's it, just a simple, random physical with two small samples of blood given, I have health insurance, they sent me the costs my insurance company covered and the total came out to be $894.00! How would someone on my salary - almost $10/hour - expect to cover that?
So in the same way that the average citizen cannot protect themselves from international terrorist plots and requires the governments support to do so, I think the average citizen cannot reasonably pay today's medical costs so they require the governments support to do so.
If it's between seeing if this cough I have is just a cold or eating tonight... I think I'd rather eat... and I think a lot of people feel the same way (especially if they have a family to support).