• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

That's In The First Ammendment? (lulz)

Parker

Well-Known Member
actually, the acceptably moderate mike castle would have won in a walk, basically giving the repubs control of the senate. but as we keep seeing, tea partiers like to vote AGAINST their own rational self interest.

and yes ink, i am getting the same sick thrills out of spectating this election season.
sigh....The Tea Party is about lowering the debt and smaller government. Castle was a sellout as he voted for the theft package. He in NO WAY WHATSOEVER has the same interest as the Tea Party. How can you not see something as obvious as that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
sigh....The Tea Party is about lowering the debt and smaller government.
so they elected someone so incredibly fiscally irresponsible that they can't even balance their own finances.

GENIUS!

voting against their own rational self interest is the mark of the tea party. i have watched many a tea partier on medicare or ss or ssd rally against that evil fed gov.
 

Parker

Well-Known Member
so they elected someone so incredibly fiscally irresponsible that they can't even balance their own finances.
GENIUS!
voting against their own rational self interest is the mark of the tea party. i have watched many a tea partier on medicare or ss or ssd rally against that evil fed gov.
The Tea Party does not want that phased out right away which is why I say that you do not know what they stand for. That's not the goal of the Tea Party as they recognize the fact that people who have paid into the system should get their money back.

The main goal is not to BALANCE the budget. The main goal is to LOWER the budget.

Castle does not represent what the Tea Party stands for.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
i guess the tea party has that in their favor...whenever you accuse them of standing for one thing or the other, they say they do not stand for that. so on and so on in circles.

it even works with the candidates. pay no attention to the extremism to be found in each and every one of the candidates so far....that is NOT what they stand for.

making it hard to hit a moving target may be a good strategy, but it is not honest politics.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
i guess the tea party has that in their favor...whenever you accuse them of standing for one thing or the other, they say they do not stand for that. so on and so on in circles.

it even works with the candidates. pay no attention to the extremism to be found in each and every one of the candidates so far....that is NOT what they stand for.

making it hard to hit a moving target may be a good strategy, but it is not honest politics.
'Honest politics' is a non sequitur.
 

ink the world

Well-Known Member
First off boy the name is Tea Party. Leave your sexual fantasies out of it.
Spoken like a true douche bag right out of the gate.

Let me ask you this, when asked how they would lower debt and what EXACTLY they would cut, not ONE could actually give an answer.......like Ive said in the past and I will continue to say:

Youve been bamboozled by these "candidates"........They cant tell us how they will lower debt, and are such strong "constitutionalists" yet dont even understand the first fucking amendment. Pathetic, even more pathetic are the sheep that buy their bullshit hook line and sinker.


Wanna buy a bridge "sport?"
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Spoken like a true douche bag right out of the gate.

Let me ask you this, when asked how they would lower debt and what EXACTLY they would cut, not ONE could actually give an answer.......like Ive said in the past and I will continue to say:

Youve been bamboozled by these "candidates"........They cant tell us how they will lower debt, and are such strong "constitutionalists" yet dont even understand the first fucking amendment. Pathetic, even more pathetic are the sheep that buy their bullshit hook line and sinker.


Wanna buy a bridge "sport?"
By using 'they' rather than 'she' you are making the mistake of judging all Teabaggers based on the ramblings of the rodeo clown.

As far as I can tell your main objection to the Teabagger movement is based on your disdain for four maybe five Teabag candidates.

They can work on the 'how' once they are elected. My main concern at this moment is their commitment to do it.

First on my list would be to eliminate all public funding for NPR, and PBS while I was at it. Liberal media should not be subsidized by the likes of me.

I would withdraw us from Afghanistan immediately. Obama is a lover, not a fighter. He does not have the stomach for it.

I would reduce the number of foreign military bases to at least 25% of what it is now. Our foreign military presence is too large. Far too large.

I would remove all US military from Korea. South Korea can protect itself now.

I would withdraw us from the UN.

I would reduce our commitment to NATO to almost nothing. Europe can protect itself now.

How's that for a start?
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
I'd say seperate church and state,,,By not allowing these fundamentalist groups in America to have political influence at all if they are "Tax Free",,,They should have to pay to play also!
 

Mindmelted

Well-Known Member
Can do NO fucking worse than Obama is doing at the moment.

Unemployment was not 15% where i live when bush was in office.

Plus i was not being treatened with fines for not being able to afford health insurance.

Now i have to buy dim wits insurance or be fined yearly for it(Yeah really good for the country)
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
That's because Bush had it all planned out. He started it and the good guy's taking the blame. F-Martha stewart lol. Mind you melted and sqiuggled! Please stop repeating the Republican Radio Media,,,I also listen and see what's really going on. Lies,Lies,Lies.
 

medicineman

New Member
Well back to the topic,,,This chick is Unreal. Let's take 1/10 step forward and 10 steps backwards,,,Again:wall::dunce:
Hey peach, good to see you back. I don't hang here as much as I used to, turmoil with one of the mods and lack of interest mainly, but We people of "intellect" need some support. Thanks for continuing the battle.
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
Hey peach, good to see you back. I don't hang here as much as I used to, turmoil with one of the mods and lack of interest mainly, but We people of intellect need some support. Thanks for continuing the battle.
Thanks "man",,,I know there are way more intellectual people here,,,Kuddo's you know who you are. In such "Bad Times" I have been Running my ass of for real and Legal and tax paying,,,I don't see at all with th BS everyone is sayin' about Obama at all. It's just Us against them like Pink Floyd! Peace and Think really hard before,,, "You people Vote",,, Change takes much more time especially in the times that "The Republicans" "GOP",or wanna be Tea Party" "Type",,,Characters wanna control more just to profit even more with no reprocuctions for them pathetic greedy asses!!!
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
"We people of intellect."

No elitism there. :-P

Intellectual giants like the Proggies on this board.

And this Rocket Surgeon.

[video=youtube;P36x8rTb3jI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI[/video]

Or these Nobel Laureates.

[video=youtube;mm1KOBMg1Y8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8[/video]

Thanks for the hearty belly laugh.
 
Top