meh, i've given up on it. reps will have the house and 49-50 seats in the senate, if not more.
all i can do is ask for more entertaining gifts like this, which seem to primarily come from tea partiers.
say there, suppose you voted in de this year. would you go coons, o'donnell, or write in? i can understand the whole wanting to drive dems from power thing you keep repeating, even when it would be against your best interests like in the case of russ feingold. but to vote for someone who has no idea what the 1st, 14th, and 16th amendments state? would ya do it?
Sorry for the delay in answering, Buck. Hell week just ended at the CISCO Academy and now I am enjoying a cold beer. It was hard going, but I dug in and got 'er done. So I am happy to report that I have completed the first phase out of four total. And I managed an 'A', but just barely. I'm talking one hair on my ball-bag barely.
Anyway, to your line of query. Happily I have never had to consider it, but I will do so because you asked.
It's fair to say that the bewitching Ms. O'Donnell was nominated with the help of infiltrators who decided it would be a safer bet to take their chances in the General against her versus the sure thing in the form of Rep. Castle, the Liberal Republican candidate.
Having said that, I would vote for her.
Here is my rationale:
Yes, she's ignorant. But that is correctable. Just a little education is all she requires to understand the way of the teabag.
And as she has hitched her wagon to the Tea Party she has committed herself to the principle of limited government. Even if she does not understand all that that entails, I'm confident she will should she be elected.
But, ultimately I would feel comfortable voting for her because she does not have a chance in hell of being elected. Lightning won't strike twice in her case.
Like I stated previously; she is a rodeo clown. She keeps the bull distracted and the crowd entertained.
Nothing more.