cowboylogic
Well-Known Member
I would think any exposure to UV, especially visually could manifest into headaches and nausea. I would proceed with caution if I were you guys. Def. get a very good pair of UV blocking sunglasses.
thanks cowboy, will def be watching it. i have been meaning to put a pair of shade in my case. my growing so bright i gotta wear shades, ya know!!!I would think any exposure to UV, especially visually could manifest into headaches and nausea. I would proceed with caution if I were you guys. Def. get a very good pair of UV blocking sunglasses.
I am trying desperately to find an article I read a few years back. The gist of it was, without light from the UV wavelengths. The world we know today would not be as colorful and vibrant as it is. It was and is, a key component to the bio-diversity of the world that surrounds us.everything I'm finding indicates that far red and infrared are the same thing?
here is a quote from dictionary
and a pic of the entire spectrum (note the little blue green yellow red in the middle, that is where we normally play)
but infrared happens right after red and before microwaves
and here is a book link that backs up what ed was saying detailing a couple of studies that were done
http://books.google.com/books?id=lvss7MQ4pOsC&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=infrared+light+and+plants&source=bl&ots=bc12Jl-mH0&sig=KuZn3J3ZjfKe4br9v-Zq3R2p1Ng&hl=en&ei=aA3BS7mlLKKCnwfCxqyBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBjgU#v=onepage&q=infrared%20light%20and%20plants&f=false
here is a great explanation of what infrared heat is and how it benefits humans (I'm sure plants get similar benefits)
http://www.cronicfatiguerelief.com/why/what-is-infrared.html
Thanks for that... I knew i'd read about this somewhere before. I'm doing a similar experiment... got some seedlings on a force flower now, and we got some super warm weather coming this week... going to be in the 90's. I'm expecting to see the seedlings begin flowering much sooner than they ordinarily would.And we will see what happens? If I am correct this will very much change the way we grow indoors
I do need to point out that this experiment is NOT about growing in higher heat/temp conditions it is about PROPERLY adjusting the light for what the plant needs to reach it's full potential and supplimenting INFRARED HEAT (same as the sun) at the proper temp. IOW not using the light for the heat that the plant needsThanks for that... I knew i'd read about this somewhere before. I'm doing a similar experiment... got some seedlings on a force flower now, and we got some super warm weather coming this week... going to be in the 90's. I'm expecting to see the seedlings begin flowering much sooner than they ordinarily would.
I see why you wanted me to follow this thread now.
I think the problem is there is lots of conflicting info out there. Ive found links saying far-red is between red and infrared according to wiki. While other sources say Far-Red and Near Infra red are one in the same, but Far-Red and Infrared are not the same. There are multiple subdivisions of Infrared, which is why I think saying Infrared and Far-Red are the same is confusing and misleading.everything I'm finding indicates that far red and infrared are the same thing?
here is a quote from dictionary
and a pic of the entire spectrum (note the little blue green yellow red in the middle, that is where we normally play)
but infrared happens right after red and before microwaves
and here is a book link that backs up what ed was saying detailing a couple of studies that were done
http://books.google.com/books?id=lvss7MQ4pOsC&pg=PA110&lpg=PA110&dq=infrared+light+and+plants&source=bl&ots=bc12Jl-mH0&sig=KuZn3J3ZjfKe4br9v-Zq3R2p1Ng&hl=en&ei=aA3BS7mlLKKCnwfCxqyBBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CBoQ6AEwBjgU#v=onepage&q=infrared%20light%20and%20plants&f=false
here is a great explanation of what infrared heat is and how it benefits humans (I'm sure plants get similar benefits)
http://www.cronicfatiguerelief.com/why/what-is-infrared.html
I have to agree, I think we can find things that would support any theory if we look long enough, or look with a closed mind, but as I said earlier it really does not affect the experiment as it relates to adding heat to allow for proper light adjustments with heat suplimentationI think the problem is there is lots of conflicting info out there. Ive found links saying far-red is between red and infrared according to wiki. While other sources say Far-Red and Near Infra red are one in the same, but Far-Red and Infrared are not the same. There are multiple subdivisions of Infra-red, which is why I think saying Infrared and Far-Red are the same is confusing and misleading.
With all Ive read so far, I think saying Near Infrared and Far-Red are the same would be a fair assessment. Alot of the stuff Ive looked at say Far-Red starts at 700nm, which is often the same for when Near-Infra red begins.
I might suggest that "we" identify what the particular frequencies are which "we" believe to cause the effects we are looking for and speak in the terminology of frequencies rather than hoping the vernacular accurately conveys what exactly we are referring to as to far red and what are infrared.I have to agree, I think we can find things that would support any theory if we look long enough, or look with a closed mind, but as I said earlier it really does not affect the experiment as it relates to adding heat to allow for proper light adjustments with heat suplimentation
so I think I will simply follow the path and see where it leads???
My understanding of it, and i think i might be right. Is that Infra red and Far red are one and the same sorta. As you said Dave there are many different types of infra red. Far-red simply indicates the far end of the red spectrum which as you correctly said manifensts itself in the form of heat whereas Infra red couldent generate the tiniest bit of heat.I think the problem is there is lots of conflicting info out there. Ive found links saying far-red is between red and infrared according to wiki. While other sources say Far-Red and Near Infra red are one in the same, but Far-Red and Infrared are not the same. There are multiple subdivisions of Infrared, which is why I think saying Infrared and Far-Red are the same is confusing and misleading.
I think one may be able to say Near-Infrared and Far-Red overlap each other to an extent. Near-Infrared would appear to start at 700nm-780nm, while Far-Red starts at 700nm and ends at 780nm-800nm. Beyond 800nm we are definitely in the infrared spectrum.
Lots of confusing info out there.
I came across that link earlier when googling .My understanding of it, and i think i might be right. Is that Infra red and Far red are one and the same sorta. As you said Dave there are many different types of infra red. Far-red simply indicates the far end of the red spectrum which as you correctly said manifensts itself in the form of heat whereas Infra red couldent generate the tiniest bit of heat.
Heres where i get my info i'm rather sure these guys know what theyre on about even if it is for kids sometimes that makes it easier
http://science.hq.nasa.gov/kids/imagers/ems/infrared.html
Hell why not develop our own and get some Chinese giant to make it for us dirt cheap and we'll all do awesome?It has been my experience that open minds lead to full wallets.
I was serious about investing in a light meter company.
Been there, done that. Do things for fun now. Doesn't mean others can't take the ideas.Hell why not develop our own and get some Chinese giant to make it for us dirt cheap and we'll all awesome?
whoa, my HPS light and plants would beg to differ. no need for anything but an HPS.The spectrum of most HPS lights sucks IMO as far as plants are concerned and the plant can only process so much light.
ha........whoa, my HPS light and plants would beg to differ. no need for anything but an HPS.
when was the last time you saw a deficiency guide and they said "your problem is only using an HPS light"... never.
also, the people on this forum who say shit like "400watts? thats your problem, you need at least 1000" would also probably argue that anything under 800 is never too much (given proper distance from light)
Well as you were "seriously" considering investing in a meter company I just figured why not do it yourself?Been there, done that. Do things for fun now. Doesn't mean others can't take the ideas.
Too lazy to do the homework. Honestly, this is more fun than making money, you tend to make enemies when you make money.Well as you were "seriously" considering investing in a meter company I just figured why not do it yourself?
How, exactly, do you KNOW your plants beg to differ? Have you run the HPS side by side with CMH? Until then, sorry Bo, you don't know diddly !whoa, my HPS light and plants would beg to differ. no need for anything but an HPS.
when was the last time you saw a deficiency guide and they said "your problem is only using an HPS light"... never.
also, the people on this forum who say shit like "400watts? thats your problem, you need at least 1000" would also probably argue that anything under 800 is never too much (given proper distance from light)
Agreed and fully related toToo lazy to do the homework. Honestly, this is more fun than making money, you tend to make enemies when you make money.