Global Warming Update

Big P

Well-Known Member
i'm watching the history channel as i type this. "how the earth was made'. the north american ice age is the current episode. they just said "the earth has been warming for the past 10,000 years. the that once COVERED the USA is now way north of us.



cars did this? 10,000 years ago?


ofcoarse cars did this! havnt you seen the flintstones pal!!!


Dumbass!!!





this is one of the actual cars they had in those days



I cant belive it survived to this day:lol:


this was before the days of GM
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
it has seat belts, lololol.


now i'm learning how the gold in california was deposited here. they are showing where all the veins are. i am packing my bags for the mountains.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
Give me a source with "good science". Let me see where you've been getting your information. One source, that's all I'm asking for.

Did you miss that Cracker??

Again, all you guys post is media hyperbole. There is a REASON that shit can't be trusted. How can you sit there and tell me I can't trust the SCIENTISTS and I should trust the JOURNALISTS?


 

dukeofbaja

New Member
I can understand the "they's fixin' to take my money" fear.

But yet I, like you Padawan, am still waiting for that ONE paper. Just one

They seem too be busy having a field day patting each other on the back though.
 

jeff f

New Member
Give me a source with "good science". Let me see where you've been getting your information. One source, that's all I'm asking for.

Did you miss that Cracker??

Again, all you guys post is media hyperbole. There is a REASON that shit can't be trusted. How can you sit there and tell me I can't trust the SCIENTISTS and I should trust the JOURNALISTS?
ITS FUCKING FREEZING...EVERYWHERE!!

source, me

that should be all you need.
 

BeginnersLuck

Active Member
Give me a source with "good science". Let me see where you've been getting your information. One source, that's all I'm asking for.

Did you miss that Cracker??

Again, all you guys post is media hyperbole. There is a REASON that shit can't be trusted. How can you sit there and tell me I can't trust the SCIENTISTS and I should trust the JOURNALISTS?
I accidental befriended this guy... Opps :-|
 

CrackerJax

New Member
Exscuse me, but the media has been overwhelmingly BACKING global warming.

It is the leaking of the corrupted data and subtefuge which unraveled everything.

The numbers have been fudges worldwide and opposing info was weeded out or altered.

Wake up and smell the coffee.
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
You accidentally befriended someone with a terrorist for an avatar?


looool


that was funny


naw come on guys pada is cool, just wants to allow them to regulate things that may not need regulating


if the earth was a company who thought it was going to crash and burn because of global warming it would gear up like we were to address the pending problem even though it was going to cost the company dearly

however once some data started coming in that they may have been wrong and there may not actually be impending doom coming

you can damn well be sure they would put those costly plans on hold until they can actaully get a firm grip on exactly what was going on before going ahead with thier costly plans.



now picture this as your company

Now, would you wait until you could actually get a firm grip on what was going on?

or

Would you go ahead with your costly plans even though it was going to cost the company dearly?



its really a no brainer guys i think thats why no one wants to explain it in detail anymore over and over again
 

CrackerJax

New Member
There might well still be criminal charges filed. Britain has been mulling it about.

There will undoubtedly be many lawsuits.

Meanwhile Obama pretends nothing has happened. That's leadership.
 

Big P

Well-Known Member
Actually, I think when faced with uncertainty about the realness of MMCC, we have to base our decision a different way...WH posted this originally, it makes a great point. This issue should be moot...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zORv8wwiadQ


good video but i can poke a hole in it


he makes his presentation like we have to either blindly go and either say there is no global warming and do nothing

or blindly go and say there is global warming and do cap and trade stuff


however, it doesnt take a genious to instead suggest an option # 3

lets do some more research for the next ten years and make a solid informed decision,

I think we owe it to humanity its the least we can do before turning everything upside down


this aint hacky sack they are playing, i demand solid information and results from the people we elect to handle the most important hurdles facing our country and world


there is already billions being wasted on this flim flam

flimsy science

fuzzy math

whatever you wanna call it

 

iivan740

Well-Known Member
IDK, CO2 forms approximately 0.04% of the nominal 5,000,000 +/- gigatonnes of gas and aerosols that comprise the Earth's atmosphere. Proponents of global warming say 3%-4% of CO2 in the atmosphere is manmade.

Doing the math .04%=.0004 and 4%=.04: . 0004 *.04 = 0.000016 or 1.6*10^-5.

SO mankind’s contribution to CO2 in the atmosphere is approximately ONE HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSANDS of our atmosphere.

Yea it's definitely all our fault!!! You mean that 0.000016 of earth’s atmosphere over the last 200 years just unbalanced the whole thing.

Also the consensus on the temprature increase is that the earth's temp has gone us somewhere between .75 and 1.25 degrees in the last hundred years. However we have only been keeping temp records for something like 160 years, so who can really tell us what the increase means.

This just in our galaxy is warming up. maybe this manmade global warming is really a manmade galaxy warming!!!!!!!!!! Wholly shit batman that ONE HUNDRED SIXTY THOUSANDS of our atmosphere just screwed our galaxy.
 
P

PadawanBater

Guest
So should I assume that's proof that you guys don't have shit to back up your claims? Not a damn thing?

I outright challenged any of you guys to show me some hard "GOOD" science - the stuff you're basing your decisions and opinion on about climate change - nothing...

Just more excuses.
 

dukeofbaja

New Member
Might be easier to move on from that debate and simply make the case for more R&D on cleaner, sustainable energy sources in order to ween ourselves off foreign oil and pollute less (pollution has ane economic cost whether believe/deny MMCC). Let's forget the old debate and see where everyone stands on this new one.

I heard someone say today that the term climate change is now passe, like global warming. It is now global climate destabilization. Make of this what you will, I am just sharing
 
Top