Well for starters I'm pretty sure that isn't true and that your country Imports a lot more than you Export, but furthermore, there are Millions of people ALREADY starving in the world because of economic exploitation by First world countries, Primarily the USA.
I think the world could live without MacDonalds, KFC and CocaCola somehow.
Jointsmith you're exposing your extremist ideals. The question isn't whether or not the world could live with out McDonalds, KFC, and CocaCola, the answer is of course we could, there's Wendy's, Arby's, PizzaHut, Domino's, Pepsi, Dr. Pepper/7 Up, Inc. (formerly owned by Cadbury Schweppes, Plc.), Jones Soda, Taco Bell, White Castle, Steak n Shake, and so on and so forth.
The question is, would the world want to bother with the extra effort of surviving with out fastfood restaurants (which provide a service (cooking the food so you don't have to)) and with out soft drinks (which taste a lot better than water, and aren't any more harmful).
I don't want to have to cook my food if I'm in a rush, it's time inefficient. Hell, in general its time inefficient for me to cook my food. I have better things to do with my time than slave over a stove.
Why do you think salaries at fastfood restaurants suck, because the jobs require a bare minimal of thought, and no skills that aren't readily learned via training (on the fly.)
As far as your anti-corporate, actually technically it should probably be, anti-Fortune 500, views I can only laugh at your idiocy.
There is nothing different between a McDonalds, and a local mom & pop diner, except for the number of locations. There is nothing to stop a properly planned operation from expanding. There's plenty of restaurant chains that compete successfully with fast food that started with a single restaurant.
Walmart could easily have been named anything else. What distinguished it, was the fact that it was able to establish a niche for itself (low prices) and capitalize on that, because it realized that its niche would be a major niche.
The idea that the world would be a better place with out corporations, with out fastfood, with out soft drinks, is an idiotic lie. The reason why corporations exist, is because they represent the economies of scale. There is no way to easily grow, ship, and distribute enough food with out corporations.
Though you might think that government can do it, but any one with any real experience in the world would recognize that government is inefficient and incapable of doing anything effectively, quickly, or with out studying the damn thing to death.
Tack onto the inefficiencies caused by non-profits and you have the explanations on why there is still starvation going on in the third world. The United States sends billions in aid over seas, and the vast majority of that money gets pocketed as it gets transferred from one person to another, or from one group to another.
More efficient would be for a corporation (which is making money from other operations) to make that donation, and if you have been paying attention to the real (instead of living in your idiotic fantasy land) you would notice that corporations do just that (well, except for the fact they typically establish inefficient NPOs to do it for them.)
Thus, the profitable corporations donate billions to Non-Profits. With out corporations non-profits would cease to exist. It is a lot easier for a corporation that profits from its employees by a few cents every hour, and has hundreds of thousands of employees, to donate than it is for those employees to donate.
The biggest problem in the world is not corporations, the biggest problem is inefficient government hell bent on attempting to protect us from ourselves, and instead enslaving us, and holding us down from realizing our true potential, because of the high rate of taxation that it has put in place.