Legal woes of That Man’s associates

printer

Well-Known Member
I was under the impression that they were stalling in order to obstruct. However I concede the legal point. Intention is a greased pig in court.

There were some legislators who actively planned and worked with the insurrection. I hope, in time, some of them face trial. Job 1 remains to bring the boss to some justice, so I’m not in a rush.
I also thought the bunch should be impeached if not sent to jail. But the process allows them to vote no, so they can not be convicted of that. Now if they worked behind the scenes to subvert the count, that should be something they should be worried about.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
New law office with ex-Trump lawyers.

Bill Barr is dead to me, that cheeseweasel.

He buried the Mueller probe on the orders (recursive obstruction) of that man. We know in retrospect that there was enough there to put that man in the hot seat.

 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member

printer

Well-Known Member
Federal judge ‘shocked’ by Jan. 6 ‘hostages’ rhetoric
A federal judge handling cases involving Jan. 6 defendants starkly criticized some of the language used to describe the 2021 riot at the Capitol, saying in a court filing that he is “shocked” by rhetoric describing those convicted of crimes that day as “hostages.”

Judge Royce Lamberth said such rhetoric falsely portray the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and that this rhetoric itself could do damange to the country.

Lamberth, an appointee of former President Reagan, also warned that this rhetoric and Jan. 6 misinformation had gone “mainstream.”

He said he’s used to having defendants who are convinced they haven’t done anything wrong; “but in my thirty-seven years on the bench, I cannot recall a time when such meritless justifications of criminal activity have gone mainstream,” he said in the court filling.

“I have been dismayed to see distortions and outright falsehoods seep into the public consciousness,” Lamberth continued.

Lamberth did not mention Trump in his writing, but his remarks appeared to reference a number of Republicans who have downplayed the events, such as Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), who has described convicted Jan. 6 defendants as hostages, and Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.), who compared those entering the Capitol that day to tourists.

“I have been shocked to watch some public figures try to rewrite history, claiming rioters behaved ‘in an orderly fashion’ like ordinary tourists, or martyrizing convicted January 6 defendants as ‘political prisoners’ or even, incredibly, ‘hostages,'” Lamberth wrote. “That is all preposterous. But the Court fears that such destructive, misguided rhetoric could presage further danger to our country.”

The judge’s comments came as he was sentencing James Little, a Jan. 6 defendant who was charged with a misdemeanor. He was initially ordered to be sentenced to 60 days in jail and three years on probation.

Little appealed and was successful, arguing he could not be charged with a low misdemeanor and then face both probation and jail. The federal appeals court sent it back to Lamberth. During that time, Little completed his incarceration.

“The Court cannot condone the shameless attempts by Mr. Little or anyone else to misinterpret or misrepresent what happened,” Lamberth wrote. “It cannot condone the notion that those who broke the law on January 6 did nothing wrong, or that those duly convicted with all the safeguards of the United States Constitution, including a right to trial by jury in felony cases, are political prisoners or hostages.”

Rep. Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.) last week introduced legislation to censure Stefanik for calling Capitol attackers “hostages.”
More than 1,200 individuals have been charged with federal crimes since the Jan. 6 attack.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Did this shameful travesty get posted here? Alex Jones trying to get away with lowballing his judgment to 3% of the penalty imposed by the court.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Hard to believe the FBI isn't looking into this, where did he get the passwords? Computer hacking is a serious crime.


'Pretty wild': CNN reporter reacts to Smartmatic allegations against Pro-Trump network

In the wake of the 2020 election, the president of the far-right network One America News sent a potentially explosive email to former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell, with a spreadsheet claiming to contain passwords of employees from the voting technology company Smartmatic, according to court filings. The existence of the spreadsheet was recently disclosed by Smartmatic, which is suing OAN for defamation.
 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
Hard to believe the FBI isn't looking into this, where did he get the passwords? Computer hacking is a serious crime.


'Pretty wild': CNN reporter reacts to Smartmatic allegations against Pro-Trump network

In the wake of the 2020 election, the president of the far-right network One America News sent a potentially explosive email to former Trump campaign lawyer Sidney Powell, with a spreadsheet claiming to contain passwords of employees from the voting technology company Smartmatic, according to court filings. The existence of the spreadsheet was recently disclosed by Smartmatic, which is suing OAN for defamation.
that it is, and OAN is being sued for defamation by Smartmatic as well along with Fox news.........
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
that it is, and OAN is being sued for defamation by Smartmatic as well along with Fox news.........
If this is true, they are screwed the exec is going to prison for a long time and it might open up a can of worms and lead who knows where. That exec will want to cut a deal on a 20-year prison sentence if they indict him.
 

BudmanTX

Well-Known Member
If this is true, they are screwed the exec is going to prison for a long time and it might open up a can of worms and lead who knows where. That exec will want to cut a deal on a 20-year prison sentence if they indict him.
according to the article, they found the email during a discovery coming from the head of OAN to Powell many many times
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
according to the article, they found the email during a discovery coming from the head of OAN to Powell many many times
Think the plaintiffs or their lawyers (as officers of the court) notified the FBI when they found their passwords were hacked and being passed around by these clowns?
 
Top