Examples of GOP Leadership

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
She won by 0.7% vote margin, so, I'd say there is significant disagreement in Boebert's district over whether or not she'd the "best and brightest" there.
I was being more insulting than serious! :lol: She is a shame to her district, and they need to own her.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
That’s as bad as that GOP idea to cognitively test candidates, and for the same reason.
Why would they want to do that, since it is so risky for them? Perhaps a clever way of getting rid of Trump? A psycho test, if such a thing were available would net a lot of the fuckers! :lol:
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I specifically dispute the assertions that sound plausible but do not have the numbers to back them. It is my opinion that the idea being discussed is frequently accepted without looking beneath the surface, where it turns out to be not so true.

It matters imo because this is the skinny end of a conceptual wedge that drives antidiverse sentiment. Knocking that wedge out inhibits the acceptance of obviously worse ideas, like that of a white homeland. That’s why I’m kicking at it.
Most countries don't track race in their national databases.

Just a quick look at Japan and their growing issue with economic inequality, there is a large divide between those working for a company on contract and permanent employees. One's education, gender and social status affects who gets the corporate job and those who don't. There is no data on the matter but it is human nature to be biased toward people who "look like you". Having worked with Japanese companies, I did not see evidence of diversity or any desire for it. So, I can't say for sure but I'm not willing to dismiss the possibility of racism affecting economic status of minorities in Japan. The absence of data isn't proof, one way or the other. There is a stark gap in pay of women compared to men and it isn't even seriously challenged in Japan, so, I love the culture, enjoyed the people I met, my memories of time spent there were good but I didn't live there and can't say one way or the other how race and ethnicity affect one's prospects in Japan.


There is this from a US researcher about France:

France has relatively low levels of income inequality. Yet due to the strength of its "colorblind" ideology, race is not accounted for in data measuring inequality and poverty.

In this talk, Dr. Montague evaluates the impact of labor market segmentation, dualism in the labor market, inequalities produced by the structure of the French welfare state, and data on poverty. She argues that there is evidence that France has high levels of intergroup inequality and persistent poverty disproportionately impacting Blacks.

If so, "colorblind" political and economic policies may be institutionalizing bias, ultimately sustaining racial inequality.



Looking further:


We further investigated changes in the residential segregation of immigrants and its relation to socioeconomic segregation. The findings show that segregation is highest between Non-Europeans and natives, much stronger than levels of segregation for immigrants overall and for most occupational groups. Further, although dissimilarity indexes remained stable or dropped somewhat between immigrants and natives, interaction indexes again revealed decreasing contact between these groups within neighbourhoods over time. Moreover, while immigrants have entered the middle occupational groups over the period, the correlation in neighbourhoods between low socioeconomic status, high unemployment and the presence of immigrants is strong and growing. These trends may reflect the effects of discrimination or native flight processes—especially among the upper classes—which consolidate disadvantage within neighbourhoods that have high shares of immigrants. Overall, socioeconomic and immigrant segregation are tightly correlated, and increasingly so over time.

Segregation between non-Europeans and immigrants in a society in which where one lives tracks with economic status. Is that an indication of racism or something else? I don't think the above statement proves anything but it cries out for more study. I also don't think there is much motivation in France to do so. It could be that people from recently immigrated non-European families who arrived in France with nothing and are in the beginning stages of accumulating wealth, which takes time over generations. It could also be that the cards are stacked against them due to institutional racism. There is no data to help decide but I wouldn't discard either theory without more information.

Getting back to your statement "I specifically dispute the assertions that sound plausible but do not have the numbers to back them. It is my opinion that the idea being discussed is frequently accepted without looking beneath the surface, where it turns out to be not so true."

Most countries don't track race with other important economic or societal factors, so your demand for "the numbers" is impossible to meet. We can discuss a subject with or without you and it doesn't matter if your needs are met, you decide if you want to participate. If a person wants to assert something that can't be proven, I'm still interested in hearing what they say.
 
Last edited:

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Hey, politics, religion, uh..not race, was it race or sex, that you're not supposed to discuss?
I read the back and forth between you and Canna. I don't see how you got here. One can talk about race or sex on this board.

Your example of "It's like saying black people are great atheletes and musicians and entertainers, is actually racist. You can't say that or it borders on bigotry. " It all depends on context and your conclusions. To say that a disproportionate number of NFL players are Black is not racist. Same with some segments in the music industry. But to ignore all other factors that drive a person to greatness and just focus on the color of their skin. That would be racist. Your statement was given without context so it sounded to me more of a complaint that you are unsure of the difference between using a word and meaning when you use a word.


"Think ChatGPT could handle this for us?" no ChatGPT is a large word association tool for that mimics human language and does not perform analysis. It might come up with an answer to a question but could be right or wrong in its conclusions.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Most countries don't track race in their national databases.

Just a quick look at Japan and their growing issue with economic inequality, there is a large divide between those working for a company on contract and permanent employees. One's education, gender and social status affects who gets the corporate job and those who don't. There is no data on the matter but it is human nature to be biased toward people who "look like you". Having worked with Japanese companies, I did not see evidence of diversity or any desire for it. So, I can't say for sure but I'm not willing to dismiss the possibility of racism affecting economic status of minorities in Japan. The absence of data isn't proof, one way or the other. There is a stark gap in pay of women compared to men and it isn't even seriously challenged in Japan, so, I love the culture, enjoyed the people I met, my memories of time spent there were good but I didn't live there and can't say one way or the other how race and ethnicity affect one's prospects in Japan.


There is this from a US researcher about France:

France has relatively low levels of income inequality. Yet due to the strength of its "colorblind" ideology, race is not accounted for in data measuring inequality and poverty.

In this talk, Dr. Montague evaluates the impact of labor market segmentation, dualism in the labor market, inequalities produced by the structure of the French welfare state, and data on poverty. She argues that there is evidence that France has high levels of intergroup inequality and persistent poverty disproportionately impacting Blacks.

If so, "colorblind" political and economic policies may be institutionalizing bias, ultimately sustaining racial inequality.



Looking further:


We further investigated changes in the residential segregation of immigrants and its relation to socioeconomic segregation. The findings show that segregation is highest between Non-Europeans and natives, much stronger than levels of segregation for immigrants overall and for most occupational groups. Further, although dissimilarity indexes remained stable or dropped somewhat between immigrants and natives, interaction indexes again revealed decreasing contact between these groups within neighbourhoods over time. Moreover, while immigrants have entered the middle occupational groups over the period, the correlation in neighbourhoods between low socioeconomic status, high unemployment and the presence of immigrants is strong and growing. These trends may reflect the effects of discrimination or native flight processes—especially among the upper classes—which consolidate disadvantage within neighbourhoods that have high shares of immigrants. Overall, socioeconomic and immigrant segregation are tightly correlated, and increasingly so over time.

Segregation between non-Europeans and immigrants in a society in which where one lives tracks with economic status. Is that an indication of racism or something else? I don't think the above statement proves anything but it cries out for more study. I also don't think there is much motivation in France to do so. It could be that people who are from recently immigrated non-European families arrived in France with nothing and are in the beginning stages of accumulating wealth, which takes time over generations. It could also be that the cards are stacked against them due to institutional racism. There is no data to help decide but I wouldn't discard either theory without more information.

Getting back to your statement "I specifically dispute the assertions that sound plausible but do not have the numbers to back them. It is my opinion that the idea being discussed is frequently accepted without looking beneath the surface, where it turns out to be not so true."

Most countries don't track race with other important economic or societal factors, so your demand for "the numbers" is impossible to meet. We can discuss a subject with or without you and it doesn't matter if your needs are met, you decide if you want to participate. If a person wants to assert something that can't be proven, I'm still interested in hearing what they say.
It was a request for numbers, which I hope discharges some of the more severe chastisements in your last paragraph.
 

sunni

Administrator
Staff member
Well, ya got me there, so I looked it all up. There
are some nations that are racially diverse, but there're some that
are not ethnically diverse. But not many at all.

So, it would appear that it is only the USA where racism is a problem.
And why, well, i was just looking for a reason, and was guessing
that probably we're so racist, and such a hating population of
human beings, was because we were forced to live with such a
diverse racial population, unlike other countries. but that's out.
We, unlike the rest of the world, have no excuse. we're just a bunch
of haters for no reason, period. Makes you proud to be an ameriKKKan.

Problem is, I kind of always thought that racism wasn't just the sole
part of White America. That Black America, and Every-Other-Race America
also contains bigots, haters, and racists. It's kind of like the old saying,
"The only thing that never changes is that everything changes.", where
in this case you could say that where ever there are people who live together,
they will always hate one another. Nice thot, eh?
mmmm no racism is in many countries
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
She won by 0.7% vote margin, so, I'd say there is significant disagreement in Boebert's district over whether or not she'd the "best and brightest" there.
It's a shame because it's a nice place, her district is pretty huge and covers lots of the mountains here. But well...there aren't many people and it isn't much different than any other rural area in terms of how they vote.

I was very surprised that the race was that close tbh, I think it speaks volumes about what the people think of her broadly. It is not an area I would generally consider competitive...though based on the below it is not quite as heavily R skewed as I would have thought.

 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
The people who voted for somebody else are innocent in the matter.
Sure they are, and they all bear collective consequences for electing idiots and assholes, not responsibility. Almost half the population may be innocent or even a majority if despots seize power, but they still suffer from it as much as the guilty and foolish Sometimes electing such people can be fatal, as hundreds of thousands of Americans found out with covid which took both left and right.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
I specifically dispute the assertions that sound plausible but do not have the numbers to back them. It is my opinion that the idea being discussed is frequently accepted without looking beneath the surface, where it turns out to be not so true.

It matters imo because this is the skinny end of a conceptual wedge that drives antidiverse sentiment. Knocking that wedge out inhibits the acceptance of obviously worse ideas, like that of a white homeland. That’s why I’m kicking at it.
I am describing the current reality in a dynamic global situation, I'm not endorsing these observations by myself and others, but can entertain ideas without accepting them. If I were writing an article I would fact check everything, but in discussion we can hopefully bounce things around a bit without getting too serious. However extraordinary assertions still need plenty of evidence to back them up, if they clash with what is generally known to be factual or harm other people and groups. Thus, I can have confidence in calling Trump an asshole and republicans fascists without providing specific links, since it could get overwhelming! :lol:
 
Last edited:

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I was gonna comment but the journalist did it for me:

A caution: Cultural diversity is a different concept than ethnic diversity. As a result, a map of the world reflecting ethnic diversity looks somewhat different than the one based on Goren’s cultural diversity measure that combines language and ethnicity profiles of a country.

Take Germany, which is a low-diversity country per map. Nonsense. There are multiple indigenous groups (look at how poorly Bavarians and Berliners get along) and many many residents from Turkey, Syria, Indonesia etc. The economic expat/guest worker phenomenon has changed the map of Europe from Greece to Ireland.
doughboy didn't say culturally diverse, he said racially diverse...
i suppose he did say ethnically diverse...your turn to find a source of info, professor.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Or they vote for her because she is their pawn. I find intelligent, smart people, with money
careers, lives, kids, families, boats, cars, SUV's, all kindsa shit they have, personalities,
charity, all kinds of 'em, and they SWEAR Biden stole the election, etc., etc. I'm tellin' ya.
you find those people around Rome Georgia, do ya? I been there, recently, and i'll be fucked if i saw any.

edit to clarify...i didn't see any intelligent, smart people with money and personalities...i saw plenty of people dumb enough to vote for green and trump...
 
Last edited:
Top