People have no right of self defense unless other people give it to them? That's absurd. "Excuse me Mr. Ruler person, but it appears you are beating me near death, would it be possible for you to grant me the right to see if I can get you to stop? No? Oh well, it didn't hurt to ask, please carry on and beat me to death, sir !"
You appear to be using "shop lifter logic" to try to make your point. As I've mentioned before, a person can still have a right to do X, which even if they're forcibly prevented from exercising, doesn't mean the right ceases to exist. Much like you would still own something if I put it in my pocket and tried to hide it from you. It's STILL your thing isn't it ?
That's not even average trolling. Slaves have the right to use a gun, a rock, a club, etc. to gain and defend their freedom, because every person does.
If one does not have a right to do x in the first place , then one cannot delegate that nonexistent right to any person(s) claiming to be government.
Nothing from nothing leaves nothing !