Remember, women got the franchise in 1920 and that is when prohibition passed. Think most men liked the idea of giving up liquor in 1920? Saloons were king makers in politics too, until then... Don't piss off the women of the country, they are better at social warfare than men and fight dirty too! Mitch is worried about it, he's like the dog that chased the car with the rag hanging out of the hubcap and he finally caught the car by the rag flapping around...GOP's message to poor women. Shut the fuck up and do your nine. And don't expect any help with the little brat. You are on your own.
Trump and the Republicans didn't stuff the courts with unqualified radicalized activist judges for nothing.Overturning Roe was the warmup act, they will overturn others next.
2 very un qualified judges, and one is a handmadian go figureTrump and the Republicans didn't stuff the courts with unqualified radicalized activist judges for nothing.
The process for amending the US constitution is difficult and impossible in this political climate. It is easier to win elections and make new laws, like it is a crime for anybody to enter into a conspiracy to deny reproductive rights to women. Another approach that would be easier than a constitutional amendment would be to hold impeachment inquires, starting with Thomas, a simple house majority is required. If they have a house majority and 67 senators, they can impeach the conservative justices, or enough of them, for no reason at all, but misleading the congress under oath would be the reason given. Remember Trump? Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one and they politicized the courts. The republicans have a huge number of senate retirements this year and many have been tainted by J6, including Chuck Grassley. We will see, abortion and guns are pissing off a lot of women, will that translate into organizations, financing, lists of voters, phone calls and knocking on doors, remains to be seen, but women are pretty good at social warfare!Shouldn’t the Democrats be pushing hard for an amendment to the constitution so as to bypass these religious wackos on the court?
It looks like they are on the popular side of a very important issue.
2/3s, 67 votes to impeach, however only 51 to confirm one lately.The problem is the filibusterer. Can't change anything unless you have 60. And the talk of getting rid of it? Could you imagine if Trump only needed 50 with the vice president being 51? I think you may be able to impeach a SC judge (could be wrong) but you would also need 60.
She perjured herself.Can a Supreme be impeached? There are five that need it, today!!!
one interesting idea i heard was for the gov't to build abortion clinics on federal lands in each state. then state laws wouldn't matter.Shouldn’t the Democrats be pushing hard for an amendment to the constitution so as to bypass these religious wackos on the court?
It looks like they are on the popular side of a very important issue.
Schumer is majority leader..it would be nice if he acted the part.Not in McConnell’s Senate, which he has controlled in spite of ‘technical’ shit like majorities and minorities ever since the Clinton era
Sadly I can not go to Colorado . Use to love going. Honestly at this point in time I have no desire to go anywhere south of the border, not even to see the “little house on the prairie” dress up women. After today it’s apparent you all are in for the fight of your lives .There are a few women here that like to dress 1883 and it's not Halloween..I asked why and was told they wish it were that way now-1883
A time when women were worth less than a man's horse, a man's property..divorce? You got the attic or asylum. Your children belong to him.
Yeah, let's go back.
But on a positive note, you can come to Colorado for Medical Asylum like I did; you can also get an abortion.
I don't go into that store where they dress like that; it creeps me out.
Right but what goes around comes around..Trump did pretty well for himself even with super majority..the filibuster needs to go as it's unconstitutional nothing gets done; each party will have their turn which should temper themselves automatically.The problem is the filibusterer. Can't change anything unless you have 60. And the talk of getting rid of it? Could you imagine if Trump only needed 50 with the vice president being 51? I think you may be able to impeach a SC judge (could be wrong) but you would also need 60.
But that's the whole paradox..once the kid is here they want nothing to do with mother and child.If the state forces you to have a baby, it should foot the bill for raising it too.
Shit, build them on Indian reservation land.one interesting idea i heard was for the gov't to build abortion clinics on federal lands in each state. then state laws wouldn't matter.