Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Prolly culottes just to ensure that nobody accidentally sees his tiny dick.Careful, your kkk robe is showing but in your case it's probably more of a dress.
Prolly culottes just to ensure that nobody accidentally sees his tiny dick.Careful, your kkk robe is showing but in your case it's probably more of a dress.
Do I have a mouse in my pocket? I speak for myslef.This is not how you guys come across.
Oh...and you guys keep expanding the government and domestic spying. Fuck off with that bullshit.
Typical liberal statement. Nothing intelligent so lets talk about something trivial as dick size. Good argument.Prolly culottes just to ensure that nobody accidentally sees his tiny dick.
FifyFreedom and the constitution.
Gun rights - so we can kill brown people who stray into white neighborhoods
smaller government - so we can fuck kids
less taxes for the rich
less welfare so the poor don't get uppity
laws for everybody else
legal immigration for Norwegians
borders unless we need former Slovakian prostitutes to marry
pay your own way in life if you are poor but no taxes when your rich daddy dies
America first until we have no allies abroad
You're true intentions are showing.Fify
Spoken like a true self-deceiving Republican.You're true intentions are showing.
That's probably the closest you'll get to getting your dick touched.Do I have a mouse in my pocket? I speak for myslef.
Don't forget the occasional token African-American who they can put right behind Trump.Republicans are for the white elite upper class.
That's it.
Every policy they support, every agenda they push, seeks to benefit solely wealthy white Americans.
But it is a deceptive slogan behind which authoritarian moves were made. Nobody brought up the forced hysterectomies on immigrant refugees.Because an American political group that stood for Canada first would be pretty stupid, wouldn't it?
True - but not uncomplicated. US military policy has been worked out in elaborate detail over many years between the two parties…which is to say, Democratic involvement in the process was shared - and often driven - by Republicans involved in the process. Once upon a time, we were able to believe that Rebumkins were honest players in these negotiations, not paid agents for private wealth seeking to be the voice of wealth in public policy, so democrats tried to work with them (story told).
The difference is that Democrats don’t spend the money without a revenue plan. That has been a Republican signature move since ‘81 and voodoo economics.
LOL, there are paid agents on both sides. You can't trust either one.True - but not uncomplicated. US military policy has been worked out in elaborate detail over many years between the two parties…which is to say, Democratic involvement in the process was shared - and often driven - by Republicans involved in the process. Once upon a time, we were able to believe that Rebumkins were honest players in these negotiations, not paid agents for private wealth seeking to be the voice of wealth in public policy, so democrats tried to work with them (story told).
Given the complex failure we‘re seeing within GOP and in reaction to paid agents’ pervasive involvement in the planning, development, execution & marketing of, and running interference for - in congress and statehouses - the fraudulent continuation of DFP in the presidency, we may see LESS deference given to GOP policies, proposals, and complaints. I certainly hope we’ve learned enough to know we can’t trust these so-called ‘conservatives’ and their stampede-able base with policy on any level.
Perhaps, however that is a different notion all together. You are basically saying that Dems had a good plan to fund their massive military spending, but the GOP don't have a good plan. OK, sure. It doesn't change the precept of massive military spending in any way to me. Maybe 20+ years ago, the idea of limited military spending by Dems compared to GOP was real, but not anymore. It's one of the things which has caused me to change my party support from Dem to No-Party affiliation.The difference is that Democrats don’t spend the money without a revenue plan. That has been a Republican signature move since ‘81 and voodoo economics.
Well that is a better excuse than the to far left bsLOL, there are paid agents on both sides. You can't trust either one.
Perhaps, however that is a different notion all together. You are basically saying that Dems had a good plan to fund their massive military spending, but the GOP don't have a good plan. OK, sure. It doesn't change the precept of massive military spending in any way to me. Maybe 20+ years ago, the idea of limited military spending by Dems compared to GOP was real, but not anymore. It's one of the things which has caused me to change my party support from Dem to No-Party affiliation.
well we already have that.Creating a christian government that perverts everything Jesus ever taught and using their "moral authority" to punish or kill anybody that they consider dangerous.
It changes it for me. One approach is more honest. It also explains why since Bushdad was unseated, every incoming Democratic President was left holding the big bag of debt and recession left by every R administration.LOL, there are paid agents on both sides. You can't trust either one.
Perhaps, however that is a different notion all together. You are basically saying that Dems had a good plan to fund their massive military spending, but the GOP don't have a good plan. OK, sure. It doesn't change the precept of massive military spending in any way to me. Maybe 20+ years ago, the idea of limited military spending by Dems compared to GOP was real, but not anymore. It's one of the things which has caused me to change my party support from Dem to No-Party affiliation.
Gotcha. So the issue of massive military spending isn't a concern to you. Your concern is about how that spending is properly budgeted, paid, and accounted for.It changes it for me. One approach is more honest. It also explains why since Bushdad was unseated, every incoming Democratic President was left holding the big bag of debt and recession left by every R administration.
Your clumsy both sides lie deliberately obfuscates the salient moral and social difference between the two parties. The Rs have become very uniformly immoral. There is a reason they did not have a platform going into the convention. They know better than to reveal they have gone pure authoritarian to a degree matching Germany 80 years ago.