Where are my libertarians at

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
If you look at his earlier posts here, he plainly stated he is here to twist liberal tail. He isn’t here to reason but to agitate.
True. And so his statements are easily discounted. It's not even fair.

Like shooing ducks on the water. It's too easy.
 

maxamus1

Well-Known Member
It's pretty common to throw complex words around without knowing what they are. Even people who know what they are, often admit to not knowing exactly what they are.
Its funny never said they were the same thing but ok
 

maxamus1

Well-Known Member
What, once you realize you can't win you start deflecting god I love you guys 10 on one and you can't handle one.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
You responded to it I responded to both of you. Yes it is and neither turn out good in the end.
How did greece and rome turn out in the end?

That's why the system itself is mostly meaningless. It's stupid to hate socialism and it's stupid to hate capitalism. Those are just proxies for something else(shitty people). With decent people, any system works just fine.
 
Last edited:

canndo

Well-Known Member
The biggest problem with libertarianism is that it is inherently reactionary and can never be preemptive.

It depends upon. The inherent and proper understanding of the masses while it preaches intellectual classism.

The flaw resides in a presumption that correct information cannot be manipulated. That all citizens must be well and correctly informed about all things.

This is why there has never been and can never be a sucessful libertarian government.
 

maxamus1

Well-Known Member
How did greece and rome turn out in the end?

That's why the system itself is mostly meaningless. It's stupid to hate socialism and it's stupid to hate capitalism. Those are just proxies for something else(shitty people). With decent people, any system works just fine.
Its not shity people its greedy people. And I agree with your statement both can do good and bad its who's in control. But sense time has began with humans its always been those that have vs the have nots. And those that have will do or say whatever is necessary to keep that which they have.

Weather its dems or republicans or whatever, they are not part of the common people they consider them selves above us and act as such so to say that one is better is simply stupid. In all of this thread I have never once said that I don't want any government not once. I want a small government that should be controlled by the people not the other way around or you end up with what we have now. Where both parties are controlled by big business. And no one looking out for the small guys.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
The biggest problem with libertarianism is that it is inherently reactionary and can never be preemptive.

It depends upon. The inherent and proper understanding of the masses while it preaches intellectual classism.

The flaw resides in a presumption that correct information cannot be manipulated. That all citizens must be well and correctly informed about all things.

This is why there has never been and can never be a sucessful libertarian government.
I had not considered that.
I have always used a different impossibility in a libertarian world. This would be enough teamwork to be able to make and maintain technology. In a world of competing economies and armed, sometimes warring nations, the libertarian herd of cats is prey.
 
Top