Lies, like Hunter's laptop had emails that implicated "the big guy" Joe. Or the interview with his veteran business partner that said Joe obviously knew about his business deals and actually met with him? What other lies did I tell?
Yeah, you don't "get" the implications of reefer madness, Nixon's War on Some Drugs, Reagans "just say no" Clinton's "zero tolerance", three strike laws, and the massive discriminatory police policies over color and drug use/possession. You're pretend ignorance is embarrassing. Grow up.
I've been smoking weed since the Reagan era. I don't base my vote on smoking or growing weed. I assumed others didn't either.
Close minded as in the folks that believe the right wing propaganda that you spew? Then I agree.
Funny how you are projecting knowledge on something that Giuliani propagated with the help of Russian military to attack Biden, that there is no proof of, just like the (fr)audit nonsense.
The people who talked dead are not the center of gravity of the group in question. They are at one extreme. To say the extreme is the reality of a group is usually a tactic of the demagogues of insurrection. This (and your uncritical promulgation of known far-right nonsense) is why you get that treatment.
Think back to our conflicting "opinions". You said republicans were conservative and I disagreed and can show you that to be false, economically speaking, and you didn't really fight me on that. You said trump wasn't a narcissistic money guy and we can look at twitter and his work history and find that to be false as well, and you didn't really fight me on that. I think we know that those disagreements were more than being strictly opinion based. And you've been arguing with like twenty people here today and I've only argued with you, so it's been easier for me to keep track of. I think you might be mixing up some of these discussions.
Yeah, lies like that. Keep insulting people by telling them obvious lies and I'll be glad to wave as you depart.
Yes, yes, we are already completely familiar with the angry lying Napoleon complex that old white men have been putting on display. Being told you can no longer have that fascist for president has made your kind all triggered and angry.
furtively sneaks hand out from between jacket buttons
Trouble is you do not read conservative. You read rank and file MAGA.
The problem with being morally conservative, which I'll assume you're equating that with being socially conservative, is that the constitution and freedom demand otherwise. You can be personally against something, but your vote must support liberty, even if it's liberty you don't like. If straight people can get married and if you support the constitution, then you must vote for gay people to be able to get married as well, even when you personally don't agree. So, morally conservative means you support people's rights over your own personal preferences.
Trumpers are not conservative. They are fascists.
Is our resident radical right wing "CONservative" still at it?What they are saying:
Republicans Stand By While Trump Defends Capitol Riot
“Anybody who’s got the approval rating of 91% of the Republicans in Iowa, you surely wouldn’t be stupid enough to turn down that help,” Chuck Grassley said.www.huffpost.com
Republicans Stand By While Trump Defends Capitol Riot
“Anybody who’s got the approval rating of 91% of the Republicans in Iowa, you surely wouldn’t be stupid enough to turn down that help,” Chuck Grassley said.
Trump called the 2020 election “the real insurrection” last week and described the attack on the Capitol as “a day of protesting the Fake Election results.”
What we saw:
View attachment 5009119
When they tell lies like that, how can we not ban them?
I have to say in light of recent actual election results you seem to be suffering from PTSD
I can't help but wonder which maggat in that photo is @rollupreader ?
