Pandemic 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

printer

Well-Known Member
Ohio COVID Patient Dies, Wife Sued to Force Ivermectin Treatment
An Ohio man with COVID-19 whose wife sued to force a local hospital to treat him with ivermectin has died, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported.

Smith was diagnosed with COVID-19 in July and died in the intensive care unit at West Chester Hospital, the Enquirer reported.

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that federal regulators and health officials have warned against for use in COVID patients. But people infected with the virus and their families have filed suits in eight other states with mixed results, according to Covering COVID-19, a daily newsletter from the Poynter Institute.

In August, Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard had ordered West Chester Hospital to treat Smith with ivermectin, the Enquirer reported. His wife, Julie, asked the court Aug. 20 for an emergency order to use the drug.

When the hospital pushed back, another judge, Michael Oster, ruled in September the hospital wasn’t required to give Smith the drug, noting the lack of evidence showing ivermectin was likely to succeed in treating COVID, court records show, the news outlet reported.

Smith tested positive for COVID-19 July 9, and was admitted to the intensive care unit July 15. He was put on the hospital's COVID protocol of the antiviral drug remdesivir along with plasma and steroids. On July 27, "after a period of relative stability," Smith's condition began to decline and he was placed on a ventilator Aug. 1, the news outlet reported.

"My husband is on death's doorstep; he has no other options," his wife wrote in her affidavit to the court, adding at another point that her husband's chances of survival had "dropped to less than 30%," the Enquirer reported.

Howard gave the go-ahead Aug. 23 for Smith to get 30 milligrams of ivermectin daily for three weeks, as requested by his wife and over the objections of the hospital. Fourteen days later Oster ruled the hospital couldn't be forced to continue the treatment.

"While this court is sympathetic to the Plaintiff and understands the idea of wanting to do anything to help her loved one, public policy should not and does not support allowing a physician to try ‘any’ type of treatment on human beings," Oster said in his court order, The Hill reported at the time.

Comments anyone?

What happened to right to try.
-------------------------
one month later is insanity. Do they not realize the damage to lung tissue in 30 days? how could anything save a guy at that point.. a month to late. shame on them. Up front before your lungs are destroyed would be the best time to give someone a weeks worth of that drug not weeks later when the guy is basically dead. Wow.
-------------------------
THEY MURDERED HER HUSBAND. I hope she OWNS them in the end! Simple, PROVEN theraputics given early clear the virus in 24-48 hours.
------------------------
Please check out the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance website. Founded by highly credentialed and respected physicians
who testify to the effectiveness of Ivermectin. Get informed.
----
Yes, and their site also says "Information on this site is NOT intended to serve as a substitute for diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified, licensed medical professional".
------------------------
And just how is it that Fauci's emails proving that he was weaponizing Covid through ( gain of function in Wuhan China), is scrubbed from the media?, And also, why did The CDC and The FDA, change the definition of a "vaccine"?
Why have these and other toxic facts been scrubbed from the media, even News Max?
--------------------
Um, you’re supposed to use ivrmctn at the first symptoms, not wait for weeks until you’re too far gone. And they had already given him Remdsvr, which is what’s causing so many de@ths. Ivrmctn had nothing to do with his death. This is just a headline for pushing the jab.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Ohio COVID Patient Dies, Wife Sued to Force Ivermectin Treatment
An Ohio man with COVID-19 whose wife sued to force a local hospital to treat him with ivermectin has died, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported.

Smith was diagnosed with COVID-19 in July and died in the intensive care unit at West Chester Hospital, the Enquirer reported.

Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that federal regulators and health officials have warned against for use in COVID patients. But people infected with the virus and their families have filed suits in eight other states with mixed results, according to Covering COVID-19, a daily newsletter from the Poynter Institute.

In August, Common Pleas Judge Gregory Howard had ordered West Chester Hospital to treat Smith with ivermectin, the Enquirer reported. His wife, Julie, asked the court Aug. 20 for an emergency order to use the drug.

When the hospital pushed back, another judge, Michael Oster, ruled in September the hospital wasn’t required to give Smith the drug, noting the lack of evidence showing ivermectin was likely to succeed in treating COVID, court records show, the news outlet reported.

Smith tested positive for COVID-19 July 9, and was admitted to the intensive care unit July 15. He was put on the hospital's COVID protocol of the antiviral drug remdesivir along with plasma and steroids. On July 27, "after a period of relative stability," Smith's condition began to decline and he was placed on a ventilator Aug. 1, the news outlet reported.

"My husband is on death's doorstep; he has no other options," his wife wrote in her affidavit to the court, adding at another point that her husband's chances of survival had "dropped to less than 30%," the Enquirer reported.

Howard gave the go-ahead Aug. 23 for Smith to get 30 milligrams of ivermectin daily for three weeks, as requested by his wife and over the objections of the hospital. Fourteen days later Oster ruled the hospital couldn't be forced to continue the treatment.

"While this court is sympathetic to the Plaintiff and understands the idea of wanting to do anything to help her loved one, public policy should not and does not support allowing a physician to try ‘any’ type of treatment on human beings," Oster said in his court order, The Hill reported at the time.

Comments anyone?

What happened to right to try.
-------------------------
one month later is insanity. Do they not realize the damage to lung tissue in 30 days? how could anything save a guy at that point.. a month to late. shame on them. Up front before your lungs are destroyed would be the best time to give someone a weeks worth of that drug not weeks later when the guy is basically dead. Wow.
-------------------------
THEY MURDERED HER HUSBAND. I hope she OWNS them in the end! Simple, PROVEN theraputics given early clear the virus in 24-48 hours.
------------------------
Please check out the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance website. Founded by highly credentialed and respected physicians
who testify to the effectiveness of Ivermectin. Get informed.
----
Yes, and their site also says "Information on this site is NOT intended to serve as a substitute for diagnosis, treatment, or advice from a qualified, licensed medical professional".
------------------------
And just how is it that Fauci's emails proving that he was weaponizing Covid through ( gain of function in Wuhan China), is scrubbed from the media?, And also, why did The CDC and The FDA, change the definition of a "vaccine"?
Why have these and other toxic facts been scrubbed from the media, even News Max?
--------------------
Um, you’re supposed to use ivrmctn at the first symptoms, not wait for weeks until you’re too far gone. And they had already given him Remdsvr, which is what’s causing so many de@ths. Ivrmctn had nothing to do with his death. This is just a headline for pushing the jab.
The Right to Try Act, or the Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act, was signed into law May 30, 2018. This law is another way for patients who have been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases or conditions who have tried all approved treatment options and who are unable to participate in a clinical trial to access certain unapproved treatments.


Clinical trials provide information about whether a product is safe to use and can effectively treat or prevent a disease. People may have many reasons for participating in clinical trials. In addition to contributing to medical knowledge, some people participate in clinical trials because there is no treatment for their disease, treatments they tried have not worked, or they are not able to tolerate the current treatments.


For patients with serious or immediately life-threatening diseases or conditions, the FDA remains committed to enhancing access to promising investigational medicines for those unable to access investigational medical products through clinical trials. This is the mission of our expanded access program. The agency is dedicated to these purposes, and it has been for more than three decades.


Building on our long-standing efforts to help patients and families who are facing life-threatening diseases or conditions, the FDA is providing information for patients on the Right to Try Act. FDA’s role in implementation of the Right to Try Act is largely focused on those obligations outlined in the law, which is limited to receipt and posting of certain information submitted regarding Right to Try use.


The Right to Try Act permits/allows eligible patients to have access to eligible investigational drugs.


An eligible patient is a patient who has:


  • Been diagnosed with a life-threatening disease or condition
  • Exhausted approved treatment options and is unable to participate in a clinical trial involving the eligible investigational drug (this must be certified by a physician who is in good standing with their licensing organization or board and who will not be compensated directly by the manufacturer for certifying)
  • And has provided, or their legally authorized representative has provided, written informed consent regarding the eligible investigational drug to the treating physician
An eligible investigational drug is an investigational drug:


  • For which a Phase 1 clinical trial has been completed
  • That has not been approved or licensed by the FDA for any use
  • For which an application has been filed with the FDA or is under investigation in a clinical trial that is intended to form the primary basis of a claim of effectiveness in support of FDA approval and is the subject of an active investigational new drug application submitted to the FDA
  • Whose active development or production is ongoing, and that has not been discontinued by the manufacturer or placed on clinical hold by the FDA
If you are interested in Right to Try, you should discuss this pathway with your licensed physician. Companies who develop and make drugs and biologics, also known as sponsors, can provide information about whether their drug/biologic is considered an eligible investigational drug under Right to Try and if they are able to provide the drug/biologic under the Right to Try Act. Ultimately, sponsors developing drugs for life-threatening diseases or conditions are responsible for determining whether to make their products available to patients who qualify for access under the Right to Try Act.


frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance are a bunch of not well respected, not well thought of doctors who are driven by notoriety...

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90552

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/frontiers-removes-controversial-ivermectin-paper-pre-publication-68505

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/apr/23/instagram-posts/fact-checking-claim-about-use-ivermectin-treat-cov/


Fauci's emails that "prove" he was weaponizing covid never fucking existed, some emails were taken out of context, with parts redacted to show a bias that was never actually there...

as to the cdc changing the definition of vaccine...
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

you are just such an ignorant petulant child...why don't you go outside and play with your friends, and let the adults decide what's best, because you clearly aren't equipped to make rational reasonable decisions
 

printer

Well-Known Member
The Right to Try Act, or the Trickett Wendler, Frank Mongiello, Jordan McLinn, and Matthew Bellina Right to Try Act, was signed into law May 30, 2018. This law is another way for patients who have been diagnosed with life-threatening diseases or conditions who have tried all approved treatment options and who are unable to participate in a clinical trial to access certain unapproved treatments.


Clinical trials provide information about whether a product is safe to use and can effectively treat or prevent a disease. People may have many reasons for participating in clinical trials. In addition to contributing to medical knowledge, some people participate in clinical trials because there is no treatment for their disease, treatments they tried have not worked, or they are not able to tolerate the current treatments.


For patients with serious or immediately life-threatening diseases or conditions, the FDA remains committed to enhancing access to promising investigational medicines for those unable to access investigational medical products through clinical trials. This is the mission of our expanded access program. The agency is dedicated to these purposes, and it has been for more than three decades.


Building on our long-standing efforts to help patients and families who are facing life-threatening diseases or conditions, the FDA is providing information for patients on the Right to Try Act. FDA’s role in implementation of the Right to Try Act is largely focused on those obligations outlined in the law, which is limited to receipt and posting of certain information submitted regarding Right to Try use.


The Right to Try Act permits/allows eligible patients to have access to eligible investigational drugs.


An eligible patient is a patient who has:


  • Been diagnosed with a life-threatening disease or condition
  • Exhausted approved treatment options and is unable to participate in a clinical trial involving the eligible investigational drug (this must be certified by a physician who is in good standing with their licensing organization or board and who will not be compensated directly by the manufacturer for certifying)
  • And has provided, or their legally authorized representative has provided, written informed consent regarding the eligible investigational drug to the treating physician
An eligible investigational drug is an investigational drug:


  • For which a Phase 1 clinical trial has been completed
  • That has not been approved or licensed by the FDA for any use
  • For which an application has been filed with the FDA or is under investigation in a clinical trial that is intended to form the primary basis of a claim of effectiveness in support of FDA approval and is the subject of an active investigational new drug application submitted to the FDA
  • Whose active development or production is ongoing, and that has not been discontinued by the manufacturer or placed on clinical hold by the FDA
If you are interested in Right to Try, you should discuss this pathway with your licensed physician. Companies who develop and make drugs and biologics, also known as sponsors, can provide information about whether their drug/biologic is considered an eligible investigational drug under Right to Try and if they are able to provide the drug/biologic under the Right to Try Act. Ultimately, sponsors developing drugs for life-threatening diseases or conditions are responsible for determining whether to make their products available to patients who qualify for access under the Right to Try Act.


frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance are a bunch of not well respected, not well thought of doctors who are driven by notoriety...

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/90552

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/frontiers-removes-controversial-ivermectin-paper-pre-publication-68505

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/apr/23/instagram-posts/fact-checking-claim-about-use-ivermectin-treat-cov/


Fauci's emails that "prove" he was weaponizing covid never fucking existed, some emails were taken out of context, with parts redacted to show a bias that was never actually there...

as to the cdc changing the definition of vaccine...
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article254111268.html

you are just such an ignorant petulant child...why don't you go outside and play with your friends, and let the adults decide what's best, because you clearly aren't equipped to make rational reasonable decisions
They believe in magic, the only problem is they could not find the right magician that is well versed in this potion. Dumb doctors don't know shit. It is the doctor's fault that he died. Nothing they did was wrong. It is always easiest to blame someone else.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
They believe in magic, the only problem is they could not find the right magician that is well versed in this potion. Dumb doctors don't know shit. It is the doctor's fault that he died. Nothing they did was wrong. It is always easiest to blame someone else.
it's his own fault he died for not taking the fucking vaccine for free when it was offered to him...same as every other motherfucker whose died from covid after refusing to take the vaccine, their fault, and their fault alone...of course, it is always easiest to blame someone else....
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Can you imagine someone doing this to your business?:

Evidence showed Christopher Charles Perez, 40, posted two threatening messages on Facebook in April 2020, falsely claiming he paid someone infected with Covid-19 to "lick items at grocery stores in the San Antonio area to scare people away" from the businesses, the US Attorney's Office in the Western District of Texas said in a news release Monday.


good riddance!:clap:

1633549311653.png

check this fat fvkers LinkedIn..it's still open to message him:lol:

they're going to realllllllllllly love dough boy in lock-up.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top