Bernie Sanders 2020

ChiefRunningPhist said:
Just going to sight this again to bring you back to reality..
Click to expand...
Don't worry, I bumped both of your citations, so it's pretty much impossible for you to be deceptive in this one.

You're whalecum to claim that Warren is "hysterical in support of the woke community" and that I'm "triggered" by your belief. I'm not telling you what you're allowed to say or cite. Hell, I'm using your citations too. I love what Warren said. She should let a teenager from the most persecuted demographic interview any prospective secretary of education. That's a fantastic idea!

They still have to be approved by the senate.
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Lol ok. You're a bit triggered where facts come from.

Here you go, left leaning media bias..
www.mediaite.com

Bill Maher Mocks Elizabeth Warren for Wanting a Transgender Child to Vet Education Secretary

Bill Maher mocked Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren for promising to have a transgender child interview her nominee for secretary of education.
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com
Click to expand...
Am I supposed to defend Bill Maher or disagree with him? I personally can't stand him. What am I supposed to do with this link? WHat do you want from me now? Am I supposed to be "triggered"?
 
abandonconflict said:
Don't worry, I bumped both of your citations, so it's pretty much impossible for you to be deceptive in this one.

You're whalecum to claim that Warren is "hysterical in support of the woke community" and that I'm "triggered" by your belief. I'm not telling you what you're allowed to say or cite. Hell, I'm using your citations too. I love what Warren said. She should let a teenager from the most persecuted demographic interview any prospective secretary of education. That's a fantastic idea!

They still have to be approved by the senate.
Click to expand...
Lol you're out there. At least you'll vote dem.
 
abandonconflict said:
Am I supposed to defend Bill Maher or disagree with him? I personally can't stand him. What am I supposed to do with this link? WHat do you want from me now? Am I supposed to be "triggered"?
Click to expand...
Lol just showing that left leaning media bias outlets are saying the same thing. You'd not read the source quoting facts I posted earlier (didn't have a clue if it was right or left, in fact I had to look up if the mediate article was left leaning or not, it's silly your level of fear) so trying to bring facts to you in a context that you can assimilate. The left admits this was a flail, the right is eating it up. Keep promoting something that's not going to help her if you want.
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Lol just showing that left leaning media bias outlets are saying the same thing.
Click to expand...
Yeah, plenty of so called progressives like Bernie supporters go around claiming that she's "hysterical in her support of the woke community" and calling people "triggered" if they disagree.
ChiefRunningPhist said:
You'd not read the source quoting facts I posted earlier (didn't have a clue if it was right or left, in fact I had to look up if the mediate article was left leaning or not, it's silly your level of fear) so trying to bring facts to you in a context that you can assimilate. The left admits this was a flail, the right is eating it up. Keep promoting something that's not going to help her if you want.
Click to expand...
This is sort of coherent, I guess you're saying that the third citation you provided is left leaning, and that therefore I should accept it? You don't make much sense really. Nonetheless, I read it and I actually agree with the opinion of the writer that Maher is a vapid troll (like you).

I actually watched the video of Warren actually saying in her own actual voice what she actually said and I am actually capable of explicating it for myself, as are all of the people who will also hear it. This is despite Bill Maher's belief that it's a Walmart nation. She didn't promise to give that kid any sort of veto power. She didn't sound hysterical to me, nor am I triggered by your misogynistic deception. It's cool though, if you want to employ bigoted tactics against Warren like you did against Harris.

Don't worry, I'm not triggered by powerful women.
 
abandonconflict said:
Yeah, plenty of so called progressives like Bernie supporters go around claiming that she's "hysterical in her support of the woke community" and calling people "triggered" if they disagree.

This is sort of coherent, I guess you're saying that the third citation you provided is left leaning, and that therefore I should accept it? You don't make much sense really. Nonetheless, I read it and I actually agree with the opinion of the writer that Maher is a vapid troll (like you).

I actually watched the video of Warren actually saying in her own actual voice what she actually said and I am actually capable of explicating it for myself, as are all of the people who will also hear it. She didn't promise to give that kid any sort of veto power. She didn't sound hysterical to me, nor am I triggered by your misogynistic deception. It's cool though, if you want to employ bigoted tactics against Warren like you did against Harris.

Don't worry, I'm not triggered by powerful women.
Click to expand...
Yes you threw a tantrum and said you'd never read the "far right tabloid," so I obliged you with a left leaning source. You claimed that she said that she's not giving veto power to a child but can't provide me with a better word. You insert things and explanations that are not consistent with her direct quote. This form of complete denial screams triggered to me. You've changed your argument to "that's not what she said/meant," once proven wrong, to, "I think it's great." You're as wishy washy as a congressional Republican when they change their defense to "no QPQ," to, "QPQ is OK if you're the president." The fact that you can't articulate a meaningful argument without name calling further suggests your emotional state, or "triggered" state. Have a grain of accountability please.
 
I'm leaning towards Bernie but I'm no diehard supporter. Some things bother me like healthcare but to be honest my coverage is shitty now. I hold the idea that taking out the profit in healthcare could save money but I honestly don't think anybody really knows what it will truly cost as were a very unhealthy nation. I'm also doubtful that either side of Congress will even work with him at all.
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Yes you threw a tantrum and said you'd never read the "far right tabloid," so I obliged you with a left leaning source. You claimed that she said that she's not giving veto power to a child but can't provide me with a better word. You insert things and explanations that are not consistent with her direct quote. This form of complete denial screams triggered to me. You've changed your argument to "that's not what she said/meant," once proven wrong, to, "I think it's great." You're as wishy washy as a congressional Republican when they change their defense to "no QPQ," to, "QPQ is OK if you're the president." The fact that you can't articulate a meaningful argument without name calling further suggests your emotional state, or "triggered" state. Have a grain of accountability please.
Click to expand...
There is literally nothing truthful about this post. Warren was not in fact promising to give a child any sort of veto power. I do in fact completely deny this, as I have consistently ever since long before you said she was "hysterical in her support of the woke community". Contradicting your blatant lie does not make a tantrum, nor am I therefore "triggered". There is nothing wishy washy about that, nor did I change my defense. You made a claim and I contradicted it. This has been my argument all along.

I'll simplify it though since you seem to be immune to logic. You said she was "hysterical in her support of the woke community". I asked you very politely to expound on this and said I didn't understand what you meant. Please go back and verify this. You then posted an article literally from a far right tabloid, to which I responded more directly and rudely since I have had such an exchange with you before in which you had a tantrum and refused to accept logic, instead using alt-right buzzwords like "triggered". I didn't change my argument when I saw the actual video of Warren speaking, I continued with the same argument, that she was not "hysterically supporting the woke community", nor was she promising a child veto power, but in fact that I continued to be correct in my assertion and furthermore, I whole-heartedly agree with what the woman said.

By all means, go back and see this, nobody else cares.

Why do women with power frighten you though?
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Delete? I've not deleted anything.
Click to expand...
Yes you did. Your two posts directed at me at the start of this exchange are gone and they were not against ToS. You deleted them and then you started another thread and tagged me in it to lure me into a new exchange devoid of this context. You're extremely dishonest and it is transparent.
 
many of the posts you left up have also been edited after I responded. You're a liar and a chickenshit @ChiefRunningPhist

You're trying to run from an exchange where you got torn up and start a new thread. You're a troll and you're full of shit.
 
abandonconflict said:
many of the posts you left up have also been edited after I responded. You're a liar and a chickenshit @ChiefRunningPhist

You're trying to run from an exchange where you got torn up and start a new thread. You're a troll and you're full of shit.
Click to expand...
Lol no just making sure the truth doesn't get buried by your constant drivel. Ill bump periodically just for you. What edits are you referring to? I corrected a few misspellings, but what comment are you upset about? I stand by all my comments.
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Just going to sight this again to bring you back to reality..

"I’m going to have a Secretary of Education that this young trans person interviews, on my behalf, and only if this person believes that our Secretary of Education nominee is truly as committed to creating a welcoming environment, a safe environment, and a full educational curriculum for everyone, will that person be actually advanced to be Secretary of Education.”
Click to expand...
Hysteria is an uncontrolled emotional response. If anything Warren doesn't exhibit enough emotion. Where is the uncontrolled emotion in that statement?

If you must continue to describe a female professor from Harvard who holds a PhD in financial law and has participated in government at some of the highest levels as a hysterical woman, well, I don't know what more can be said.

Can you at least agree that there is such a thing as a hysterical woman trope and that this trope is commonly used to diminish accomplished women without cause?
 
ChiefRunningPhist said:
Lol no just making sure the truth doesn't get buried by your constant drivel. Ill bump periodically just for you. What edits are you referring to? I corrected a few misspellings, but what comment are you upset about? I stand by all my comments.
Click to expand...
No.

You deleted comments from the thread and edited others after I responded to them. Then you made another thread and tagged me there to remove the rest of the context because you got torn apart here.

You're a liar and a troll, but don't worry, I'm not triggered, I'm just going to keep pointing out how full of shit you are.
 
Fogdog said:
Hysteria is an uncontrolled emotional response. If anything Warren doesn't exhibit enough emotion. Where is the uncontrolled emotion in that statement?

If you must continue to describe a female professor from Harvard who holds a PhD in financial law and has participated in government at some of the highest levels as a hysterical woman, well, I don't know what more can be said.

Can you at least agree that there is such a thing as a hysterical woman trope and that this trope is commonly used to diminish accomplished women without cause?
Click to expand...
It was worse before he started deleting his posts and editing some others.

He's desperate to get this exchange going in another thread but nobody really cares lol.
 
Fogdog said:
Hysteria is an uncontrolled emotional response. If anything Warren doesn't exhibit enough emotion. Where is the uncontrolled emotion in that statement?

If you must continue to describe a female professor from Harvard who holds a PhD in financial law and has participated in government at some of the highest levels as a hysterical woman, well, I don't know what more can be said.

Can you at least agree that there is a hysterical woman trope and that this trope is commonly used to diminish accomplished women without cause?
Click to expand...
100% I'd agree to that. And I'm not saying that Warren is hysterical, or her previous achievements are lack luster, or that I don't agree with 90% of her campaign. I'm saying the policy line proposed was a bit over the top and coicendentally comes a few days before super Tues after she's slipped a bit in polls.

After being ridiculed by a child I'm less likely to offer up differentiation between the two sentiments, at least unprompted (Warren is hysterical, or policy is hysterical), but Id agree there is a stigma, and that the word "hysterical" if often used to undermine female legitimacy.

Disagreeing with the merits of a policy has zero to do with the sex of the proponent, one can disagree with a policy that happens to be put forth by a woman and not be mysoginistic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top