The Australian Bush Fire TRUTH

Hi community, its no secret that the bushfires devostated our communities all over the country, not to mention the poor wildlife caught in the midst of it, but we will recuperate im sure of it.
THE TRUTH
What a lot of people forget is that the country always has a cycle of devastation followed by a period of relief, it isn't a fact of global warming, but its a problem created by the Greenies, they have stopped the allowance of people to clear and clean out the forest floors of dead fauna such as logs and leaves, fuel in other words.
The fire department used to be allowed to back burn throughout the country and get rid of the fuel that powers the fires, but they passed a law that stopped that, they think it disrupts the wildlife... clearly the fires do 1000x more damage then back burning could ever do, and now this is the result -
A natural disaster that has been exacerbated by the Greens Party laws. This law also prevents citizens from having the right to clean the forest floors and cut up dead tree logs ect, if any person is caught removing or disturbing the natural habitats of wildlife there are major fines and the person will be persecuted.
If the country could back burn the fuel off the forest floors, which is inches thick, the fires would simply burn out and stop spreading, or at the very least be alot easier to contain.
I hope this informs people a little more about the problems and causes that are contributing to these disasters, and how it is not a problem of climate change, I'm not saying climate change doesn't exist, personally i think it dosent exist and is purely a con created by Al Gore and his little friend but i don't know enough factual information to back this up.
If anyone else has any information about the fires, climate change or related topics - please share them with me. I would like to see your countries views on the situation over here.
:eek:
 
Last edited:

DustyDuke

Well-Known Member
#straya cunt
I never pay for fire wood! I always collect it for free, I don’t pay for heating bills. Well except that light that warms the bathroom up in the morning (you have to draw the line somewhere). Well maybe $30 bucks in juice there and back and some for the chainsaw.
Problem is most Aussie are lazy and don’t do fuck all but winge.
Not sure about law stopping citizens collecting “fuel”, sure there time’s of the year that are no go zones and not in national parks. But there national parks for a reason and it stops idiots that think they know what they’re doing, from damaging the ecosystems.
Not back burning is dumb as fuck agreed.
Anyways check this link out so you and your boys can go get hard wood in the bush.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
Hi community, its no secret that the bushfires devostated our communities all over the country, not to mention the poor wildlife caught in the midst of it, but we will recuperate im sure of it.
THE TRUTH
What a lot of people forget is that the country always has a cycle of devastation followed by a period of relief, it isn't a fact of global warming, but its a problem created by the Greenies, they have stopped the allowance of people to clear and clean out the forest floors of dead fauna such as logs and leaves, fuel in other words.
The fire department used to be allowed to back burn throughout the country and get rid of the fuel that powers the fires, but they passed a law that stopped that, they think it disrupts the wildlife... clearly the fires do 1000x more damage then back burning could ever do, and now this is the result -
A natural disaster that has been exacerbated by the Greens Party laws. This law also prevents citizens from having the right to clean the forest floors and cut up dead tree logs ect, if any person is caught removing or disturbing the natural habitats of wildlife there are major fines and the person will be persecuted.
If the country could back burn the fuel off the forest floors, which is inches thick, the fires would simply burn out and stop spreading, or at the very least be alot easier to contain.
I hope this informs people a little more about the problems and causes that are contributing to these disasters, and how it is not a problem of climate change, I'm not saying climate change doesn't exist, personally i think it dosent exist and is purely a con created by Al Gore and his little friend but i don't know enough factual information to back this up.
If anyone else has any information about the fires, climate change or related topics - please share them with me. I would like to see your countries views on the situation over here.
:eek:
What a complete pile of bull crap. Green's have no power in any state nor the federal govt. Conservatives cut funding plain and simple plus we have a warming climate and drought conditions.
Leader of the Greens supports back burning you stupid piss ant. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7859481/Greens-leader-Richard-Di-Natale-insists-party-supports-burning-stop-bushfires.html

My back yard as of yesterday. So don't call me a greenie cunt.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
I would like to see your countries views on the situation over here.
The same EXACT thing happened last year with the California, USA fires.
I lost my home in the Carr Fire.

Our tree-hugging 'environmentalists' decided to leave it to nature and not allow any clearing or logging of our forests.
For centuries, the Native Americans here would harvest crops, then set fire to them, then move further south for the winter and let it burn. If lightning started a fire, they would let it burn. The grasses would all burn off under the trees never getting hot enough to set the oaks on fire.
Then the white man came and as soon as there was fire, it would get put out. Smokey the bear was on duty; and fuel started to accumulate.
We plant trees like farmers plant wheat. Trees are a crop. It just takes longer for that crop to mature ... but its a crop. What farmer would plant, harvest and not replant? We planted more trees than we harvested. But, that's not what these bleeding heart hippies saw ... what they saw was evil people murdering trees. I wonder if they live in a building built of trees? Or do they just live on the street.
There is a lot of crops out there that need to be harvested, still. There is a lot of fuel on the floor of these forests that once lit, gets very hot and burns the trees too. And my home.
But, the politicians won't let us clean it up.
Why?
Where is the science there?

The same damn thing happened here.
 

HashBucket

Well-Known Member
I notice that some of the haters have posted in defense of their environmentalist brothers, and the defense is 'it was arson'.

I sat on a jury once. A man owned a business, a pizza parlor. His employees complained of smelling gas at times, and having headaches. He just told them to get back to work.
One employee quit because she was getting sick.

One day, the manager walked in and flipped on the lights, and the place blew up. He was badly burned. He sued his boss.

His boss claimed that it wasn't the gas leak that caused the explosion. It was the spark when the manager turned on the lights. So, the manager did it to himself.

Do you think we went for that shit? LoL

So, if the gov't allows fuel to build up, does nothing abut it, and an arsonist starts a fire ... it's the arsonists fault? Yea ... some. Not much. There has always been arsonists. I bet there was arson happening in Australia a hundred years ago? What's different is the amount of fuel that the gov't insists on making available to those arsonists.

And if your rabid environmentalists are anything like ours, you'll never convince them of anything different.
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
The same EXACT thing happened last year with the California, USA fires.
I lost my home in the Carr Fire.

Our tree-hugging 'environmentalists' decided to leave it to nature and not allow any clearing or logging of our forests.
For centuries, the Native Americans here would harvest crops, then set fire to them, then move further south for the winter and let it burn. If lightning started a fire, they would let it burn. The grasses would all burn off under the trees never getting hot enough to set the oaks on fire.
Then the white man came and as soon as there was fire, it would get put out. Smokey the bear was on duty; and fuel started to accumulate.
We plant trees like farmers plant wheat. Trees are a crop. It just takes longer for that crop to mature ... but its a crop. What farmer would plant, harvest and not replant? We planted more trees than we harvested. But, that's not what these bleeding heart hippies saw ... what they saw was evil people murdering trees. I wonder if they live in a building built of trees? Or do they just live on the street.
There is a lot of crops out there that need to be harvested, still. There is a lot of fuel on the floor of these forests that once lit, gets very hot and burns the trees too. And my home.
But, the politicians won't let us clean it up.
Why?
Where is the science there?

The same damn thing happened here.
You be on drugs.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Arnold,+CA/@38.3517162,-120.4002385,21294m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8090a536f59db76f:0x5ab4fea99aed75b0!8m2!3d38.2554729!4d-120.3510307
 

Tangerine_

Well-Known Member
The same EXACT thing happened last year with the California, USA fires.
I lost my home in the Carr Fire.

Our tree-hugging 'environmentalists' decided to leave it to nature and not allow any clearing or logging of our forests.
For centuries, the Native Americans here would harvest crops, then set fire to them, then move further south for the winter and let it burn. If lightning started a fire, they would let it burn. The grasses would all burn off under the trees never getting hot enough to set the oaks on fire.
Then the white man came and as soon as there was fire, it would get put out. Smokey the bear was on duty; and fuel started to accumulate.
We plant trees like farmers plant wheat. Trees are a crop. It just takes longer for that crop to mature ... but its a crop. What farmer would plant, harvest and not replant? We planted more trees than we harvested. But, that's not what these bleeding heart hippies saw ... what they saw was evil people murdering trees. I wonder if they live in a building built of trees? Or do they just live on the street.
There is a lot of crops out there that need to be harvested, still. There is a lot of fuel on the floor of these forests that once lit, gets very hot and burns the trees too. And my home.
But, the politicians won't let us clean it up.
Why?
Where is the science there?

The same damn thing happened here.
I notice that some of the haters have posted in defense of their environmentalist brothers, and the defense is 'it was arson'.

I sat on a jury once. A man owned a business, a pizza parlor. His employees complained of smelling gas at times, and having headaches. He just told them to get back to work.
One employee quit because she was getting sick.

One day, the manager walked in and flipped on the lights, and the place blew up. He was badly burned. He sued his boss.

His boss claimed that it wasn't the gas leak that caused the explosion. It was the spark when the manager turned on the lights. So, the manager did it to himself.

Do you think we went for that shit? LoL

So, if the gov't allows fuel to build up, does nothing abut it, and an arsonist starts a fire ... it's the arsonists fault? Yea ... some. Not much. There has always been arsonists. I bet there was arson happening in Australia a hundred years ago? What's different is the amount of fuel that the gov't insists on making available to those arsonists.

And if your rabid environmentalists are anything like ours, you'll never convince them of anything different.
imagesT6IY6GDX.jpg
 

xtsho

Well-Known Member
The same EXACT thing happened last year with the California, USA fires.
I lost my home in the Carr Fire.

Our tree-hugging 'environmentalists' decided to leave it to nature and not allow any clearing or logging of our forests.
For centuries, the Native Americans here would harvest crops, then set fire to them, then move further south for the winter and let it burn. If lightning started a fire, they would let it burn. The grasses would all burn off under the trees never getting hot enough to set the oaks on fire.
Then the white man came and as soon as there was fire, it would get put out. Smokey the bear was on duty; and fuel started to accumulate.
We plant trees like farmers plant wheat. Trees are a crop. It just takes longer for that crop to mature ... but its a crop. What farmer would plant, harvest and not replant? We planted more trees than we harvested. But, that's not what these bleeding heart hippies saw ... what they saw was evil people murdering trees. I wonder if they live in a building built of trees? Or do they just live on the street.
There is a lot of crops out there that need to be harvested, still. There is a lot of fuel on the floor of these forests that once lit, gets very hot and burns the trees too. And my home.
But, the politicians won't let us clean it up.
Why?
Where is the science there?

The same damn thing happened here.

"For centuries, the Native Americans here would harvest crops, then set fire to them, then move further south for the winter and let it burn."

Native Americans never set the forests on fire.

Many of the Australian fires were started intentionally by arsonists. Don't disrespect Native Americans by using them to further your pathetic agenda.
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Maybe shit works different down under and in Cali, but up here fallen trees suck up a enormous amount of water and are damn near impossible to burn.

Clearcutting areas for rural homes, and roads to get to them, power lines running everywhere, rising temperatures causing droughts and crazy weather patterns, makes it hard for me to buy that these fires are simply because people are not raking the forests.

But unfortunantly @ guy who joined this weekend, with every disaster story being used to enrage people on every side of any issue by trolls, it will be hard to have actual conversations about this because people will rather just state 'their' opinions than take the long time it takes to understand the science behind the topics.

We need to learn to live and have a lot smaller impact on our planet.
 
Top