Its very fucking thin. The pistachio market is really interesting. The Resnicks are also interesting. The topic even has a film being made about it which, I hope, is more interesting than the article.
It doesn't really say anything other than they give a lot of money away to politicians from both sides. How is that different from early and mid-stage capitalism? How does it "represent the failures of Late-Stage capitalism" as the title suggests? Wealthy people have donated money to politicians to represent their interests since the inception of time. I'm not saying that that is good, just that this short puff-piece fails to deliver in just about every way unless the point is getting a bunch of ideological dullards to foam at the mouth about the headline.
The writing is shit. But I guess that is worth a link to people who start with a conclusion and accept anything that panders to it.
Here's a better article about pistachios with more information but fewer polemics for those of us that don't need thought guides.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-41640066
Here is a better article about the Resnicks and their water use. These fuckers make more annually selling the water they buy at a discount back to California at inflated rates than all of us will make over our entire lifetime.
https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/08/lynda-stewart-resnick-california-water/
It is fucking sad that Progressives can only accept the most facile explanation for everything.