Boeing, Obama A Gold Watch and 346 Dead

squarepush3r

Well-Known Member
https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/06/07/boeing-obama-a-gold-watch-and-346-dead/


Boeing, Obama A Gold Watch and 346 Dead
by Russell Mokhiber

Photograph Source: Oleg V. Belyakov – CC BY-SA 3.0

Democrats want to make Donald Trump the issue in 2020.

If they do, they will lose again, the way they lost in 2016.

Instead, the 2020 election should be about corporate power in all of its manifestations, its hold on the culture, our country and both major political parties.

Take the case of the two Boeing 737 Max 8 airplane crashes — the Lion Air crash off the coast of Jakarta, Indonesia in October 2018 that killed all 189 on board and the Ethiopian Airlines crash in March 2019 that killed all 157 on board.

During his time as President of the United States, Barack Obama promoted the sale of Boeing planes — including the 737 Max 8 planes — around the world.



In November 2011, in Bali, Indonesia, President Obama announced an agreement between Boeing and Lion Air.

“For the last several days I’ve been talking about how we have to make sure that we’ve got a presence in this region, that it can result directly in jobs at home,” Obama said. “And what we see here — a multibillion-dollar deal between Lion Air — one of the fastest-growing airlines not just in the region, but in the world — and Boeing is going to result in over 100,000 jobs back in the United States of America, over a long period of time.”

“This represents the largest deal, if I’m not mistaken, that Boeing has ever done. We are looking at over 200 planes that are going to be sold.”

In September 2014, Obama met with the Prime Minister of Ethiopia at the White House.

“We’re strong trading partners,” Obama said. “And most recently, Boeing has done a deal with Ethiopia, which will result in jobs here in the United States.”

“I’m expecting a gold watch from Boeing at the end of my presidency because I know I’m on the list of top salesmen at Boeing,” Obama said at an export forum at the White House in September 2013.

Of course, Obama got more than just a gold watch from Boeing when he left the White House.

According to a report from Bloomberg, Boeing donated $10 million to the Obama presidential library and museum in Chicago. And earlier this year, Obama dropped in to speak to a Boeing leadership retreat at a swank resort in Scottsdale, Arizona. Obama gratefully waived his $400,000 speaking fee.

While pushing the sale of Boeing planes around the world, the Obama administration was at the same time fast tracking a dangerous deregulatory process at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that effectively put the corporations in charge of the safety certification process — and that in effect put Boeing in charge of certifying it’s faulty MCAS software that led to the tragedies in Indonesia and Ethiopia.

The FAA certification system is known as the Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) program. Under that program, companies like Boeing can appoint their own representatives to act in the place of FAA inspectors.

In 2004, one of the unions representing FAA inspectors – Professional Aviation Safety Specialists (PASS) – criticized the proposed ODA program as “premature and reckless.”

“Allowing the aviation industry to self-regulate in this manner is nothing more than the blatant outsourcing of inspector functions and handing over inherently governmental oversight activities to non-governmental, for-profit entities,” PASS wrote in its 2004 comments to the FAA.

Would a more independent FAA have prevented the two recent Boeing crashes?

Yes, says Paul Hudson of Flyer’s Rights.

“The ODA program has allowed Boeing to effectively self certify the MCAS software as safe,” Hudson told Corporate Crime Reporter.

“Boeing ‘s CEO, whistleblowers and FAA now admit they failed to properly test, fully connect, or even disclose MCAS, much less its deadly defects and overpowering features — not to the FAA higher ups, not to airline pilots or not even to its own test pilots.”

“Air travel has gotten much safer due to both safety regulation and technical advancements,” Hudson said. “But profit seeking over safety at all costs is destroying both safety and profits.”

“Some Boeing safety inspectors have summed up the current culture as ‘safety is king but schedule is God,” Hudson said. “I asked Boeing in December after the Lion Air crash to ground the Max. Boeing refused.”
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Every word of this article is true. It is also true that whether Obama or McCain was in office, the same would have happened.

Corporate accountability, not to mention political accountability, is sorely lacking in our country. Until that changes, nothing else will either.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Every word of this article is true. It is also true that whether Obama or McCain was in office, the same would have happened.

Corporate accountability, not to mention political accountability, is sorely lacking in our country. Until that changes, nothing else will either.
Except the primary reason they exist is both a corporation and a government are designed to shed individual accountability and shield privileged people.

They can't be fixed if those aspects remain. If those aspects are removed, they cease to be corporations and government and become just people.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Except the primary reason they exist is both a corporation and a government are designed to shed individual accountability and shield privileged people.

They can't be fixed if those aspects remain. If those aspects are removed, they cease to be corporations and government and become just people.
This is, as usual for you, utterly idiotic. Governments and corporations are held accountable all the time- in other countries. America, as usual, is the outlier.
 

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Yes, I used to do inspections on military aircraft. It was part of my job. We do a lot more inspections than in the private sector.
FAA is involved primarily with type certifications and major upgrades. When Boeing- without oversight- decided, for cost saving reasons, to treat MCAS as a 'noncritical' system as part of upgrading the 737 from NG to MAX, the FAA took them at their word.

Needless to say, that system of self certification and oversight is under review. It should be junked completely due to the obvious and persistent conflict of interest issues.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
This is, as usual for you, utterly idiotic. Governments and corporations are held accountable all the time- in other countries. America, as usual, is the outlier.
Except, a corporation was designed to shed personal responsibility for an act onto the corporation.

If governments are held accountable, why can they break your door in, steal your stuff, shoot your dog, and make you pay them money and put you in a cage if you grow a plant they tell you not to ?

If I broke into your house and did all the stuff I just described, would I be able to get away with it like a government person can ?

Governments and corporations were designed to shed accountability for some individuals. The fact you called me an idiot and then failed to rebut my assertion, makes me wonder if you might have some kind of cognitive problem or mental deficiency.
 
Top