Trump's Wag the Dog Moment; Syrian chemical attack was a false flag!
- Thread starter ttystikk
- Start date
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Yet more evidence that the Syrian chemical attacks were staged, aka false flag actions.
https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/06/eminent-american-scientist-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack-was-staged.html
https://washingtonsblog.com/2019/06/eminent-american-scientist-syrian-chemical-weapons-attack-was-staged.html
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Gee, another article by the same crank. Wow, all that same "evidence" printed in a hundred shady blogs really makes ya think.
Lol.
It makes me think "what the fuck is wrong with Tty?".
Still waiting for the evidence of the OPCW "certifying" this "leaked report". But there isn't any. Oh, you can link one of your thought guides twisting their words - that will be all you need since it conforms with what you want to believe. Because ... Vulcan Logic and the Iron Law of Prostitutions.
You are a simple soul. Low and simple.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
He keeps crawling through the sewers of the internet and occasionally shows us soft brown nuggets of "truth" like this.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
That's because his political thoughts are so intertwined with his ego.
This is his lane!
Lol.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Imagine the accomplishment of memorizing all the propaganda published by Putin and Assad on this subject.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Betcha he didn't even think up the idea of firebombing people's homes.
Sad. He really is the least imaginative useful idiot ever. Putin deserves better.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Speaking of useful idiots, why don't you volunteer to go defend America's interests in Syria?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Look at how his most recent reply parrots back your own words. His own post validates what you just said.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Again you are making things up - as usual. For you, the biggest sin is criticizing (sorry, criticising) you, and anybody who does so you automatically assume the worst. It's just about your only tactic.
So if you post some obvious bullshit about the Carter Foundation "certifying" Maduro's election and one of us points out that your source is full of shit, you come back with the accusation that we support war with Venezuela.
If you regurgitate some half baked propaganda about how the US is false flagging about the Syrian chemical weapons attack or the Novichok attack, you claim that this is somehow proof of us supporting corporate interests.
I know you like to think that you are some sort of ultra-pure vanguard of the revolution, but you aren't. You are just a pompous, pretentious twat with sub-par intelligence who believes fake news and is easily manipulated.
What, what, guv'nor?
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Derp.
No one said America was behind the false flag attacks, dimwit.
The 'American backed' (but then abandoned) rebel militia did it in order to suck America back into the conflict because they were getting their asses kicked by Assad's forces.
Now British MPs are asking tough questions about this story of soon to be ex Prime Minister May. It seems I'm far from the only one who thinks shenanigans are afoot.
But keep advertising how disinformed you are, it's entertaining if nothing else.
Varulv
Well-Known Member
That is how the postwar propaganda narrative goes. You only have to read Hitlers speech to see that Germany declared war in response to polish attacks on german civilians and border guards. Prior to this, polish Marshal Rydz-Smigley had stated in the british press that ”Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to”. Brits gave him their guarantees, and so it went.
As for false flag chemical weapons attacks carried out by US/Israeli/Saudi sponsored terrorists in Syria, Theodor Postols article was an interesting read. I remember planning for such attacks was revealed in Britam email hacks back in 2013, in which military contractors discussed an offer to transport chemical weapons from Libya to Syria for use in false flag operations. Funny how it ties into Libya with all that went down in Benghazi.
”the White House and senior Congressional members deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations”
https://www.aim.org/benghazi/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/CCB-Interim-Report-4-22-2014.pdf
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Just curious, please post your source that British MPs are asking tough questions about this story to soon to be ex-Prime Minister May.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
Of course he is. And that is why he and @ttystikk have such a common bond.
What do you think the odds are that Tty will come across with a source that says British MPs are asking questions about the Novichok episode? Zero?
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2019/06/04/mp-chris-williamson-confronts-uk-government-with-apparent-evidence-of-staged-chemical-attack-in-syria/
It was literally the second result in the search, dimwit.
Does bring that dense come naturally or do you have to work at it?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Typical; you're proven wrong straight to your face- so you whine about the source.
You're a fraud. Go vote for Trump.
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
LOL
another obscure site doesn't prove anything.
You lost the right to call anybody a fraud when you were arrested for pimping your abused and brutalized whore in that Wyoming parking lot.