Blacks are Responsible for More Than 50% of All Homicides...

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
Please just read this stuff and have a laugh. I'm just bored and I like to science shit up a bit. Everyone go smoke a joint and have a good weekend please. Thanks. Lol
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
It was because it was referencing the numbers that I was referring too.

But you are correct, being born in a crime filled community raises the chances doesn't it?

Then when you force a bunch of black people into those communities you get fucked up stats correct?
Is there something special to you about black people forced into poverty? You could just have easily said white people forced into poverty, couldn't you?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Wow the article hits a lot of good points, the way we are programmed to breed being one of them. Here's a quote from a part of it.

"Blacks have the most testosterone (Ellis & Nyborg, 1992), which helps to explain their higher levels of athletic ability (Entine, 2000). Testosterone acts as a “master switch.” It goes everywhere in the body and affects many bio-behavioral systems. It affects self-concept, aggression, altruism, crime, and sexuality, not just in men, but in women too."

Not only this but breeding in general is our reason for being, the way every species evolves is to benefit the chances of breeding.

The article insists blacks are more aggressive and sexually active than whites, also that they have a lower iq and are physically larger and superior to whites, they have larger penises too and this is a key point, in Africa not many years ago tribes used to steal eachothers women and children and sell them off and breed with them. Some scientists believe having a larger penis ensured that if a women had been bred recently the man with a larger penis would essentially scrape out her insides and plant his semen deeper down inside her and thus raise the chances of conceiving. This was a form of ensuring their dna be passed on through both consensual sex and rape. They say it's these sacrifices that are the opposite on a white male.

They argue on the other side white males have smaller penises and breed for longevity and not just numbers, iq and intelligence become sexual factors, lack of pigmentation causes leas testosterone and therefore less violent and aggressive behavior, more power to use the brain.

I'm not saying this is exactly right, society has proven to change the way people breed and live, today things are different for sure.

The more you think about it the more it makes sense, we are no different than animals really.

If it's true, good for the people that can fight that extra wave of testosterone and not turn it into violence or aggression.
It made no points at all. It extracted portions from a series of other articles. There was no validation of its conclusions, just a wall of text and attributions.

Maybe if a person were well read on the subject, it might be useful. Have you read all the articles it referenced? Did he portray the results of those studies accurately?

I found that article very unconvincing and not scientific at all.
 

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry are you humans exempt from the laws of nature? We make choices yes but we are all animals too.

Like I said I don't believe all this shit it's just a read, @UncleBuck how is it neonazi? Can they even write shit like this? I was under the impression that the neonazi and kkk groups weren't very science driven and have low iqs lol.

We are all just animals here, who's to say that this isn't true, there were hundreds of citations and my conclusion is clear, why would neonazis write something that clearly portrays it's nobody's fault and that white men invented guns to compensate our smaller penises in the breeding game lol.

Just fucking laugh already!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I'm sorry are you humans exempt from the laws of nature? We make choices yes but we are all animals too.

Like I said I don't believe all this shit it's just a read, @UncleBuck how is it neonazi? Can they even write shit like this? I was under the impression that the neonazi and kkk groups weren't very science driven and have low iqs lol.

We are all just animals here, who's to say that this isn't true, there were hundreds of citations and my conclusion is clear, why would neonazis write something that clearly portrays it's nobody's fault and that white men invented guns to compensate our smaller penises in the breeding game lol.

Just fucking laugh already!
google phillipe rushton idiot
 

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
It made no points at all. It extracted portions from a series of other articles. There was no validation of its conclusions, just a wall of text and attributions.

Maybe if a person were well read on the subject, it might be useful. Have you read all the articles it referenced? Did he portray the results of those studies accurately?

I found that article very unconvincing and not scientific at all.
I don't think you read much of it, while it uses some harsh statements, it clearly points out flawed statistics in favor of whites and other ethnicities.

Again can you show me otherwise, I'm trying to research something here, I show you things and if you believe them to be untrue, show me something else that says otherwise.

Where's the full left wing liberal stats on the issue? I want some for my own sake and can't find it can you help me?
 

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
Is there something special to you about black people forced into poverty? You could just have easily said white people forced into poverty, couldn't you?
What do you mean here? I'm confused. I can say that but it doesn't fit the criteria why? If i said that it wouldn't support your argument would it? I was pointing out why the stats are flawed, if poor whites are there in the same numbers why aren't the numbers showing it? I was supporting your argument.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
another fucking new member pretending to be liberal but citing the neo-nazi eugenicist phillipe rushton as gospel.

transparent
 

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
A criticized scientist who would've thought?

There's a lot more than just him weighing in on the subject as well.

Are we are all really born equally, or do we all have different chemical amounts that influence our decisions.

Even if this were true, it's not a bad thing, it would be a reason not an excuse.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
A criticized scientist who would've thought?

There's a lot more than just him weighing in on the subject as well.

Are we are all really born equally, or do we all have different chemical amounts that influence our decisions.

Even if this were true, it's not a bad thing, it would be a reason not an excuse.
rushton is not a scientist. he is a neo-nazi eugenicist.

please stop spamming our forum with white supremacy
 

Excessive_Toker

Well-Known Member
(Yawns) So, is the consensus that we need to offer blacks free college education while simultaneously banning them from possessing guns? This could cut America's homicide rate by 50% if the DOJ is correct.
 

907cannabis

Well-Known Member
Show me somewhere better to get my stats please, it's all I'm asking.

Anytime you have nothing you condemn the other person in the argument. I don't blindly follow one side like you Buck. There are good people in every corner of the world.

Quit being so whiney about everything, show me where to look already, I'm asking for some liberal ammo and you keep loading on the conservative shit. That is the way of the trump, when you have no evidence or argument, call names and make fake dirt.

Show me some studies that help prove this crap wrong please, it's your chance to shine.
 
Top