Russian interference in elections is a sad joke

[ttystikk]

I'm hurt, an unsuccessful divorced middle aged slob just called me names, wah!

Seriously? This is the best you manage when someone has the balls to discuss the issues confronting our country on your insignificant lil piece of virtual forum turf?

Sad!

 

[Justin-case]

Seriously? This is the best you manage when someone has the balls to discuss the issues confronting our country on your insignificant lil piece of virtual forum turf?

Sad!

You're the problem, stalling progressives, sowing division with idiot truther theories. Fucking seriously, get fucking lost, you dumb fucking troll.

 

[ttystikk]

You're the problem, stalling progressives, sowing division with idiot truther theories. Fucking seriously, get fucking lost, you dumb fucking troll.

Ah, so your best answer for those who question the last half century of ineffective representation is to tell them to go away.

You stumping for a spot in the Chump administration? I hear they have plenty of openings for those with big mouths and no brain.

 

[Justin-case]

Ah, so your best answer for those who question the last half century of ineffective representation is to tell them to go away.

You stumping for a spot in the Chump administration? I hear they have plenty of openings for those with big mouths and no brain.

You're as bad as sky, so fucking desperate for attention any kind will do. Silly me, i'm such a fucking bleeding heart liberal I actually feel bad for your two sorry asses, smh.

 

[ttystikk]

You're as bad as sky, so fucking desperate for attention any kind will do. Silly me, i'm such a fucking bleeding heart liberal I actually feel bad for your two sorry asses, smh.

If I kick you in the ass hard enough, will it stimulate enough blood flow for you to start thinking again?

 

[Justin-case]

LMFAO

Former CounterPunch contributor Israel Shamir was part of the WikiLeaks organisation and an associate of its director, Julian Assange,[20] and in late 2010 and early 2011 wrote a series of exclusive articles for CounterPunch drawing on materials from the United States diplomatic cables leak.[21] He has also written and co-written articles for CounterPunchon what he alleges to be a campaign of harassment against Assange.[22] One of these articles, "Assange Betrayed",[23]made allegations against a plaintiff in a Swedish rape case against Assange that were widely circulated in the media.[24][25] The allegations in CounterPunch were the topic of controversy in the mainstream media.[26][27]

 

[ttystikk]

LMFAO

Former CounterPunch contributor Israel Shamir was part of the WikiLeaks organisation and an associate of its director, Julian Assange,[20] and in late 2010 and early 2011 wrote a series of exclusive articles for CounterPunch drawing on materials from the United States diplomatic cables leak.[21] He has also written and co-written articles for CounterPunchon what he alleges to be a campaign of harassment against Assange.[22] One of these articles, "Assange Betrayed",[23]made allegations against a plaintiff in a Swedish rape case against Assange that were widely circulated in the media.[24][25] The allegations in CounterPunch were the topic of controversy in the mainstream media.[26][27]

Counterpunch takes articles from a wide range of sources.

If you want to assert that one of them being less than credible means the entire channel is suspect, then might I suggest you start smearing CNN, MSNBC, FOX, CBS, ABC, etc, etc, etc.

Since you don't, two things are evident; you don't think and you don't question what you're told.

Good boy. I hear the Chump administration has lots of open positions for someone with 'qualifications' just like yours.

 

[Justin-case]

Counterpunch takes articles from a wide range of sources.

If you want to assert that one of them being less than credible means the entire channel is suspect, then might I suggest you start smearing CNN, MSNBC, FOX, CBS, ABC, etc, etc, etc.

Since you don't, two things are evident; you don't think and you don't question what you're told.

Good boy. I hear the Chump administration has lots of open positions for someone with 'qualifications' just like yours.

You come in here, no strategy, and just start swinging at everyone . I imagine your life has been the same, one big passive aggressive meltdown, sad.

 

[ttystikk]

You come in here, no strategy, and just start swinging at everyone . I imagine your life has been the same, one big passive aggressive meltdown, sad.

I'm picking my targets carefully.

They come out swinging at me first.

Since you do it so reflexively, with no thought whatsoever, I'm not surprised you failed to notice the pattern.

 

[ttystikk]

totally cynical. Self fulfilling prophecy. Useless too. But worst of all, not even close to the truth.

My representatives have demonstrated the ability to represent their constituents, not themselves. I know you can't understand this.

Really? Have they passed single payer healthcare yet? How about progressive taxation on wealthy individuals, million dollar incomes and megacorporations?

I must have missed that somehow.

 

[ttystikk]

It is naive to say that Republicans and Democrats are the same.

Right. Compleeeeetly different;
They both dodge the healthcare issues like their lives depend on it.

They both pass record breaking defense appropriations bills with wide majorities.

They both recommend their candidates not talk about guns after megashootings like Sandy Hook, Las Vegas and Parkland.

Shall I go on?

 

[Fogdog]

Lol

I know it's hard for you to venture outside the safe confines of the Rachel Maddow Show.

But tell us all how it REALLY is out there, from the wide open spaces between your keyboard and reason.

Very unclear what you are referring to.

Are you still maintaining that Russian interference is a sad joke? It's a sad reflection on the minority that still support Trump now that the American people know more about it. I'll agree with you there.

Funny thing, Breitbart claims the same as you.

Right. Compleeeeetly different;
They both dodge the healthcare issues like their lives depend on it.

They both pass record breaking defense appropriations bills with wide majorities.

They both recommend their candidates not talk about guns after megashootings like Sandy Hook, Las Vegas and Parkland.

Shall I go on?

Naive.

Democrats support repeal of Citizens United and reform of campaign financing
Democrats support universal healthcare coverage.
DACA
A woman's right to choose, not to mention access to reproductive medical care that isn't constrained by other people's religious views.
Democrats never would have cut taxes for the wealthy, nor would they have paid those cuts though by national debt.
25% tariffs on steel, 10% tariffs on aluminum?
Need I say more?

 

[ttystikk]

Very unclear what you are referring to.

Are you still maintaining that Russian interference is a sad joke? It's a sad reflection on the minority that still support Trump now that the American people know more about it. I'll agree with you there.

Funny thing, Breitbart claims the same as you.

Naive.

Democrats support repeal of Citizens United and reform of campaign financing
Democrats support universal healthcare coverage.
DACA
A woman's right to choose, not to mention access to reproductive medical care that isn't constrained by other people's religious views.
Democrats never would have cut taxes for the wealthy, nor would they have paid those cuts though by national debt.
25% tariffs on steel, 10% tariffs on aluminum?
Need I say more?

What language is this?

I think I recognize it; 'distraction', the official language of the oligarchs.

You speak it well.

I'll believe the Democrats give one single solitary confinement rat's ass about Citizens United when they actually have the votes to pass something.

Meanwhile, see my thread about the DCCC, unless Rollitup took it down for being unflattering to the Liberal Cause.

 

[Fogdog]

What language is this?

I think I recognize it; 'distraction', the official language of the oligarchs.

You speak it well.

I'll believe the Democrats give one single solitary confinement rat's ass about Citizens United when they actually have the votes to pass something.

Meanwhile, see my thread about the DCCC, unless Rollitup took it down for being unflattering to the Liberal Cause.

Belief >>> facts, eh tty?

Your belief is irrelevant. How bout sticking to facts.

To wit:
The Senate Tried to Overturn ‘Citizens United’ Today. Guess What Stopped Them?

https://www.thenation.com/article/senate-tried-overturn-citizens-united-today-guess-what-stopped-them/

Fifty-four senators, all Democrats and independents who caucus with the Democrats, voted Thursday for the amendment to clarify in the Constitution that Congress and the states have the authority to do what they did for a century before activist judges began intervening on behalf of wealthy donors and corporations: enact meaningful campaign finance rules and regulations.

But forty-two senators, all Republicans, voted no.

You simply believe despite facts. Fact: Every Senator who caucus with Democrats supported Bernie's bill. Fact. There is this inconvenient (to you) fact that repeal of CU is written as a plank in the Democratic Party's charter.

Is this where you quote infowars?

 

[ttystikk]

Belief >>> facts, eh tty?

Your belief is irrelevant. How bout sticking to facts.

To wit:
The Senate Tried to Overturn ‘Citizens United’ Today. Guess What Stopped Them?

https://www.thenation.com/article/senate-tried-overturn-citizens-united-today-guess-what-stopped-them/

Fifty-four senators, all Democrats and independents who caucus with the Democrats, voted Thursday for the amendment to clarify in the Constitution that Congress and the states have the authority to do what they did for a century before activist judges began intervening on behalf of wealthy donors and corporations: enact meaningful campaign finance rules and regulations.

But forty-two senators, all Republicans, voted no.

You simply believe despite facts. Fact: Every Senator who caucus with Democrats supported Bernie's bill. Fact. There is this inconvenient (to you) fact that repeal of CU is written as a plank in the Democratic Party's charter.

Is this where you quote infowars?

It didn't pass, did it?

Pesky fact, that.

 

[abandonconflict]

It didn't pass, did it?

Pesky fact, that.

THANKS OBAMA! Why are you exactly like a Trump supporter?

 

[ttystikk]

THANKS OBAMA! Why are you exactly like a Trump supporter?

Derp

 

[abandonconflict]

I'm not the one who thinks racism will go away if we never talk about it, that would be you. I'm not the one who thinks Trump becoming president was the best thing that ever happened for the left, that would be you. Be sure to clean out the dog kennel before you put your next victim in it.

 

[UncleBuck]

It didn't pass

your original complaint was that you don't "believe the Democrats give one single solitary confinement rat's ass about Citizens United".

your new complaint is that the bill did not pass when "the Democrats" voted unanimously to strike down CU

so your belief that "the Democrats" did not "give one single solitary confinement rat's ass about Citizens United" is false. they did give at least one "solitary confinement rat's ass" about that (weird thing to say though)

btw, CU was passed after the 6 week period in which democrats had a supermajority. so there's that too

 

[Fogdog]

It didn't pass, did it?

Pesky fact, that.

Guess what stopped them?

hint

It was Republican opposition.

Very pesky fact. Indeed.