Vanity Fair gets the chair for this video

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
~snip~You know Buckold doesn't swing that way, so why?

Hark! The voice of experience!

So you're another well seasoned traveler of the dirt road.
Me? I'm in the pink! ;)
~snip~
It speaks volumes about you that you are simultaneously repelled and fascinated by homosexuality. It is equally illuminating that you think slyly calling someone gay constitutes an insult. It is that only to the profoundly repressed. I have declared my homosexuality on the forum, so why you imagine this would discomfit me is beyond reason.

The second tell is your overt misogyny. curious2glansscape? What does that mean, except that you hate females? Yet you defend Buck's alleged homosexuality against the incursions of those filthy women.

When you see a video of two men passionately kissing with open mouths, consider that uneasy quiver in your abdomen. Follow that feeling, because the truth shall set you free.

~edit~ ceterum censeo How did this hammered turd of a thread end up in T&T? It is plainly a Politics thread. Mods, please move it back.
 
Last edited:

choomer

Well-Known Member
What that showed me is that the people I actually previously believed to be progressive, weren't. They just pretended they were.. They're moderates. I'd actually classify many of them as pretty extreme moderates. They believe pushing a centrist political strategy will win when it comes to the votes despite nearly a decade of evidence showing the opposite.
Let's see,
Progressives, moderates, extreme moderates, and centrists; All divisive labels/tactics to keep people from talking effectively and finding common ground,.
Even you, who recognizes the reason for those labels, have been lulled into their use.
Labels like those are exactly what foster the thinking that one word can sum up a person as you recognize below.
What's funny is that when you ignore mainstream political labels and get down to the actual issues, someone like you and I can agree on many different things, even though we support opposing political views on nearly every issue. I think this basically comes down to the importance of being able to discuss opposing political beliefs in a civil way.
That starts when we start to take politics OUT of the equation.

Politics just another term for control and divisive labeling has proven to be a very effective tool for that.
The other highly effective tool is fear.
This issue hits home with me on a personal level because politics is something I can't really talk about in a civil way with some of the people I have the closest relationships with in my personal life who happen to hold different political views.
So you seek a nominally anonymous venue to do so?

Then politicians are "winning" in their effort to control.
What can you do to hinder that?
I wholeheartedly believe the way common people become so defensive about their personal politics is by design. Divide and conquer. So I believe it's really up to us to work to try to defeat that in order to reach the common ground each of us share (you and I being a good example of that) and educate society and actually pragmatically fight for the things we both know we need and each of our factions, along with the majority of Americans support.
Common people? Factions? Majority? Just other terms used for division.

Having said that, take the way the opposition argues; hate, bigotry, sexism, misogyny, condescension, dismissal, racism, etc. All the things they conveniently project, left or right, the common denominator being opposition against them
Denominator? If you took math you know that words root is necessary for division too. ;)
They'll say it's also because we're racist/sexist/etc., that they collectively decided to agree with this strategy, when the reality is that many of them have repeatedly pleaded with progressives to "Get on the same page" with them and have assured us that "We can still be friends, you know.."..
So that's using the fear of ostracization to bully someone into choosing sides.

;)
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
It speaks volumes about you that you are simultaneously repelled and fascinated by homosexuality. It is equally illuminating that you think slyly calling someone gay constitutes an insult. It is that only to the profoundly repressed. I have declared my homosexuality on the forum, so why you imagine this would discomfit me is beyond reason.
Not really, although I am happy you are comfortable with your lot in life.
But when that lot is used as a divisive tool by a very small faction (due to simple biology) to divide it is a club whose membership dues or compassionate affiliations are a bit too steep for me.
The second tell is your overt misogyny. curious2glansscape? What does that mean, except that you hate females? Yet you defend Buck's alleged homosexuality against the incursions of those filthy women.
She already labeled me a misogynist last time I stumbled into TnT, so I thought it fitting to appeal to the narrow scope of her views.
When you see a video of two men passionately kissing with open mouths, consider that uneasy quiver in your abdomen. Follow that feeling, because the truth shall set you free.
No, just not intersted.
Does it give you that feeling when you see a man and woman kiss?
Physician, heal thyself. ;)
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Not really, although I am happy you are comfortable with your lot in life.
But when that lot is used as a divisive tool by a very small faction (due to simple biology) to divide it is a club whose membership dues or compassionate affiliations are a bit too steep for me.
Bullshit. Your response to me and to Tangie implied that being gay was deviant and a lesser category of human. You're weaseling.
She already labeled me a misogynist last time I stumbled into TnT, so I thought it fitting to appeal to the narrow scope of her views.
Lol "narrow"? That's all you got? What a weak way to obfuscate that you cannot say she is wrong ... and then support the claim. I mean, curious2glansscape ... I know what that implies, and it is ugly.
She read you correctly, and now you are out to assassinate her character. This does not make her look bad, as we all can recognize your argument as still steaming under the horse.
No, just not intersted.
Does it give you that feeling when you see a man and woman kiss?
Physician, heal thyself. ;)
End with an irrelevancy that is supposed to somehow conjure your superiority as a heterosexual. Your slip is showing.

Why do you have a hate boner for Annie, Bob and me? I do not recall having run afoul of your rather ossified opinions before this. It seems we have given your jimmies a good rustle, but I cannot figure your motive out. And after your display of snidery and broken logic, my ignorance is fortified by apathy. Go back to your regular venue and resume your name-calling and plausibly deniable calumnies there.

 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Ya know the only one who EVER called me blobby was Abe.
Oh and come out of the closet already. Everyone knows you're gay except YOU.
Who is Abe and WhyTF should I care?
You are a little too caught up in your advertising own importance since if you really were important you'd just move the topic yourself. ;)
Get a life and realize that you're just not that important to me, or post another TL;DR gif to show how intellectually insightful you are.
Bullshit. Your response to me and to Tangie implied that being gay was deviant and a lesser category of human. You're weaseling.
No, I'm just pointing out that if it weren't for breeders you wouldn't be. Simple biology.
I'm sorry that nature dealt you a minority hand.
Lol "narrow"? That's all you got? What a weak way to obfuscate that you cannot say she is wrong ... and then support the claim. I mean, curious2glansscape ... I know what that implies, and it is ugly.
She read you correctly, and now you are out to assassinate her character. This does not make her look bad, as we all can recognize your argument as still steaming under the horse.
I didn't seek her out. We had our meeting and she just wasn't interesting enough to bother with (as if TnT lends anything to the betterment of mankind).
curious2glansscape means she likes to keep the lawn mown. Don't you as a homosexual man (I assume) manscape?
I just like fvcking w/ screen names and it sure got your dander up, cannobeer.
End with an irrelevancy that is supposed to somehow conjure your superiority as a heterosexual. Your slip is showing.
Until parthenogenesis or Matrix-like gestational proxy is the norm, heterosexuals will always be superior as far as evolution goes.
I didn't do that, biology did.
Why do you have a hate boner for Annie, Bob and me? I do not recall having run afoul of your rather ossified opinions before this. It seems we have given your jimmies a good rustle, but I cannot figure your motive out. And after your display of snidery and broken logic, my ignorance is fortified by apathy. Go back to your regular venue and resume your name-calling and plausibly deniable calumnies there.
If the topic hadn't been moved neither of us would know/care about the other, but it did and you jumped onto the bandwagon steered by your compatriots with no prior knowledge of me or who I am.
To think that i care about you other than as an amusing waste of time is another self-inflating egoistic ploy.
You're gay. Dandy.
Why do you think anyone else gives a fvck?

The gif speaks volumes. Now wipe it, like with a cloth.
 
Last edited:

Bob Zmuda

Well-Known Member
Who is Abe and WhyTF should I care?
You are a little too caught up in your advertising own importance since if you really were important you'd just move the topic yourself. ;)
Get a life and realize that you're just not that important to me, or post another TL;DR gif to show how intellectually insightful you are.

No, I'm just pointing out that if it weren't for breeders you wouldn't be. Simple biology.
I'm sorry that nature dealt you a minority hand.

I didn't seek her out. We had our meeting and she just wasn't interesting enough to bother with (as if TnT lends anything to the betterment of mankind).
curious2glansscape means she likes to keep the lawn mown. Don't you as a homosexual man (I assume) manscape?
I just like fvcking w/ screen names and it sure got your dander up, cannobeer.

Until parthenogenesis or Matrix-like gestational proxy is the norm, heterosexuals will always be superior as far as evolution goes.
I didn't do that, biology did.

If the topic hadn't been moved neither of us would know/care about the other, but it did and you jumped onto the bandwagon steered by your compatriots with no prior knowledge of me or who I am.
To think that i care about you other than as an amusing waste of time is another self-inflating egoistic ploy.
You're gay. Dandy.
Why do you think anyone else gives a fvck?

The gif speaks volumes. Now wipe it, like with a cloth.
Hey at least you know who I am.

I have no CLUE who you are except that I must have damaged your anus at some point and you're one of those politics weirdos no one likes.

Oh. And EVERYONE knows you're gay.

Except you.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Who is Abe and WhyTF should I care?
You are a little too caught up in your advertising own importance since if you really were important you'd just move the topic yourself. ;)
Get a life and realize that you're just not that important to me, or post another TL;DR gif to show how intellectually insightful you are.

No, I'm just pointing out that if it weren't for breeders you wouldn't be. Simple biology.
I'm sorry that nature dealt you a minority hand.

I didn't seek her out. We had our meeting and she just wasn't interesting enough to bother with (as if TnT lends anything to the betterment of mankind).
curious2glansscape means she likes to keep the lawn mown. Don't you as a homosexual man (I assume) manscape?
I just like fvcking w/ screen names and it sure got your dander up, cannobeer.

Until parthenogenesis or Matrix-like gestational proxy is the norm, heterosexuals will always be superior as far as evolution goes.
I didn't do that, biology did.

If the topic hadn't been moved neither of us would know/care about the other, but it did and you jumped onto the bandwagon steered by your compatriots with no prior knowledge of me or who I am.
To think that i care about you other than as an amusing waste of time is another self-inflating egoistic ploy.
You're gay. Dandy.
Why do you think anyone else gives a fvck?

The gif speaks volumes. Now wipe it, like with a cloth.

You seem to know an awful lot about the gay community, even while putting your contempt on display.

No wonder we can tell that you are a repressed homosexual.

Your "explanation" of the slur against Annie doesn't even stand cursory inspection. You are not good at this.

Btw "breeder" is a derogatory term used by gays for heteros. Know thineself, repressed one.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
You seem to know an awful lot about the gay community, even while putting your contempt on display.
No wonder we can tell that you are a repressed homosexual.
Your "explanation" of the slur against Annie doesn't even stand cursory inspection. You are not good at this.
Btw "breeder" is a derogatory term used by gays for heteros. Know thineself, repressed one.
Yeah I know how gay people are, I know quite a few of them. If you've ever worked in the hospitality industry they are a disproportionate amount of those hired.
You seem to labor under the false assumption that they don't talk to any but their own and I don't remember them electing you as their spokesperson. ;)

As to Annie (curious2glansscape?) I certainly wasn't suggesting that she practiced clitoral circumcision as they do in muslim and african countries. What do YOU think "glansscape" means as without that your assumption of slur rests squarely upon your shoulders.
BTW, "this" certainly seems good enough to bunch your panties, Mary.

Now either go back to watching Dancing With The Stars or explain yourself and your assumptions more thoroughly.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Hey at least you know who I am.
I have no CLUE who you are except that I must have damaged your anus at some point and you're one of those politics weirdos no one likes.
Oh. And EVERYONE knows you're gay.
Except you.
Using your own logic, it would seem that for all your boasts of conquest, you are anything but the ladies man you portray yourself to be and much more likely an underdeveloped genetic anomaly that has no sexual experience.

Now if you don't like me, why do you keep trawling for my attention? Didn't mommy still love you and understand your short comings?
I don't remember inviting your comment to this thread and if there wasn't jiggery-pokery going on @ admin level you would be a much happier clam. ;)
 

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Yeah I know how gay people are, I know quite a few of them. If you've ever worked in the hospitality industry they are a disproportionate amount of those hired.
You seem to labor under the false assumption that they don't talk to any but their own and I don't remember them electing you as their spokesperson. ;)

As to Annie (curious2glansscape?) I certainly wasn't suggesting that she practiced clitoral circumcision as they do in muslim and african countries. What do YOU think "glansscape" means as without that your assumption of slur rests squarely upon your shoulders.
BTW, "this" certainly seems good enough to bunch your panties, Mary.

Now either go back to watching Dancing With The Stars or explain yourself and your assumptions more thoroughly.
LOL @UncleBuck no wonder you use the name choomer as a derogatory slur.

I don't even remember an exchange with you and I don't care enough to waste time searching. Enjoy the maggot in your brain, pumpkin.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
Yeah I know how gay people are, I know quite a few of them. If you've ever worked in the hospitality industry they are a disproportionate amount of those hired.
You seem to labor under the false assumption that they don't talk to any but their own and I don't remember them electing you as their spokesperson. ;)

As to Annie (curious2glansscape?) I certainly wasn't suggesting that she practiced clitoral circumcision as they do in muslim and african countries. What do YOU think "glansscape" means as without that your assumption of slur rests squarely upon your shoulders.
BTW, "this" certainly seems good enough to bunch your panties, Mary.

Now either go back to watching Dancing With The Stars or explain yourself and your assumptions more thoroughly.
Your bigoted ignorance drips from this post.

"Yeah I know how gay people are." I am one and I don't make that claim. Gays are as diverse as any other people. The showoffs and drama queens do not represent all of us, and
your willingness to pigeonhole gays into a restrictive type celebrates your stubborn ignorance, what we gays call "stupidity".

Nice try insinuating I said that about Annie. You are as dishonest as you are misogynistic.

"Biological superiority" of heterosexuals is pure creation science. You are exposed as the classic far-right Inquisitionist. Go away and mail another fat check to your televangelist of choice, but leave us normal humans alone.
 
Last edited:

Bob Zmuda

Well-Known Member
Using your own logic, it would seem that for all your boasts of conquest, you are anything but the ladies man you portray yourself to be and much more likely an underdeveloped genetic anomaly that has no sexual experience.

Now if you don't like me, why do you keep trawling for my attention? Didn't mommy still love you and understand your short comings?
I don't remember inviting your comment to this thread and if there wasn't jiggery-pokery going on @ admin level you would be a much happier clam. ;)
LOL you seem upset.

Who the fuck ARE you?
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Let's see,
Progressives, moderates, extreme moderates, and centrists; All divisive labels/tactics to keep people from talking effectively and finding common ground,.
Even you, who recognizes the reason for those labels, have been lulled into their use.
Labels like those are exactly what foster the thinking that one word can sum up a person as you recognize below.

That's an interesting point. How would you suggest one should differentiate between these different groups in a less divisive sort of way in order to identify them without actually offending them or sullying the dialogue? This question goes for right wing groups as well

That starts when we start to take politics OUT of the equation.
How do we take politics out of the equation when discussing things of political nature?
Politics just another term for control and divisive labeling has proven to be a very effective tool for that.
The other highly effective tool is fear.

I agree. The tactic of divide and conquer is used very effectively in American politics. But how do we get people with completely opposing political beliefs to have a civil dialogue discussing them without resorting to attacks? I think RIU is a perfect example of how this simply can't be done. Sometimes we have to offend people. Sometimes, people have to get offended. How could someone pro-life and I, someone adamantly pro-choice, reach a compromise between the two positions? Is that one of those live and let live sort of situations?
So you seek a nominally anonymous venue to do so?
Then politicians are "winning" in their effort to control.

Again, I agree, but I don't know how to change it. I've tried many times, each time approaching with a completely different tactic, each time being defeated by anger and ignorance. Someone like my dad is just so entrenched in his beliefs, that anytime anyone makes a valid point against them, he just gets pissed off to the point that it ends the entire conversation. "You spend too much time reading about all this shit.. I don't have time for that.". How could you even begin to combat that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You've sullied yourself to come to politics? You know Buckold doesn't swing that way, so why?

Hark! The voice of experience!

So you're another well seasoned traveler of the dirt road.
Me? I'm in the pink! ;)

You hope. But I'm more than happy knowing I deny you what you crave from sheer lack of interest.
I wonder how many of the other posters here can say that?

@ttystikk used to be a compadre of yours, so did @Padawanbater2, and once they were shown what was going on behind the curtain they, since they seem to have morals, rejected a political affiliation that had once been something they championed and shared with you.
They didn't abandon all their other beliefs you seemed to have in common. Just one.

You and your companions, on the other hand, will take no pause in castigating, belittling, berating, etc. either of them at any chance you get, just because they are on the other side of a schism within a political party and the lawlessness that party had done in the name of "a better tomorrow" which stood against the very name and ideals of said party.
It doesn't matter what you try to build on a pile of shit, it always sinks to the lowest level, but you can't seem to see that.

People like that are no better than congresscritters, oligarchs, monarchy, or clergy,

They revel in the controlling others through violence while exempting themselves from the rules they impose and it gets proven over and over from the highest offices all the way down to here.

Now get out your TL;DR stamps and try to skew the topic towards your oh so demonstrative hate since if you take an outside view of what you have done and have an ounce of empathy or intelligence it might give you pause, though I doubt it.

All the quotes above are exactly why I still come here. :D

I just hate bullies and will do what I can to keep them from enjoying their favorite past time.

P.S. I'm screenshooting this one too.
It already worked getting this moved back from where it was "mysteriously" moved to and even if this "mysteriously" goes away, I'll know I posted it and at least one of you had to see it. ;)

complete meltdown
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
That's an interesting point. How would you suggest one should differentiate between these different groups in a less divisive sort of way in order to identify them without actually offending them or sullying the dialogue? This question goes for right wing groups as well


How do we take politics out of the equation when discussing things of political nature?

I agree. The tactic of divide and conquer is used very effectively in American politics. But how do we get people with completely opposing political beliefs to have a civil dialogue discussing them without resorting to attacks? I think RIU is a perfect example of how this simply can't be done. Sometimes we have to offend people. Sometimes, people have to get offended. How could someone pro-life and I, someone adamantly pro-choice, reach a compromise between the two positions? Is that one of those live and let live sort of situations?

Again, I agree, but I don't know how to change it. I've tried many times, each time approaching with a completely different tactic, each time being defeated by anger and ignorance. Someone like my dad is just so entrenched in his beliefs, that anytime anyone makes a valid point against them, he just gets pissed off to the point that it ends the entire conversation. "You spend too much time reading about all this shit.. I don't have time for that.". How could you even begin to combat that?


have fun agreeing with a nazi, padaraper

i suspect that like you, choomer also struggles to get it up wit women

nothing wrong with that as long as you can own it though
 
Top