Why do detractors constantly fail to argue against policy?

Heil Tweetler

Well-Known Member
You and the likes of you set a fine example of making up shit , whenever someone points out your flaws.

Why do you support an evil Zionist state that doesn't even recognize Yahweh or his commandments, let alone the human laws? Does it have something to do with God's curse upon your people who worshiped a calf right after witnessing the miracles of God?

If you're not a believer, then why would you give a fuck about the commandments, just do as you please like Israel.

your problems are not with me, the Palestinians, or the rest of the world that odes not support your evil actions, your problem was and still is with the Al Mighty, stop the corruption on earth, give people back what they own, and seek God's forgiveness, and all will be forgiven.
Most likely you will not do it because you have a mission to accomplish, you're being rounded up in Palestine surrounded by walls to fulfill God's promise and deliver his punishment upon you calf worshipers.
Hideous judgment, the stench of appalling decision making, the rot of a heritage of hate and failure, the decay guaranteed by generations of misguided leaders, the poverty of mind, spirit and curcumstance ensured through defiant ignorance, no wonder you and @choomer fell into each others assholes.
 

MarWan

Well-Known Member
So anyone who disagrees with your antisemitism is a Zionist? You hate me just because I'm of Jewish decent? Why am I not the least bit surprised?
Hideous judgment, the stench of appalling decision making, the rot of a heritage of hate and failure, the decay guaranteed by generations of misguided leaders, the poverty of mind, spirit and curcumstance ensured through defiant ignorance, no wonder you and @choomer fell into each others assholes.
does this look familiar :bigjoint:


The Wall Street bull as seen in New York’s financial district, March 7, 2017. (Reuters / Brendan McDermid)
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
I don't hate you, I just don't like you being on the evil side.
I think you're just too chickenshit to admit it. You have done so much blathering about how "Jews actually carried out the holocaust against themselves" and when called on it, you post a picture of a statue of a bull. I mean, what is the problem? It's not illegal to be an antisemitic nazi piece of shit. Why are you so afraid to admit it? Same reason you're afraid to off yourself?
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
Sorry, got a little snippy and since you at least try to post links to support your stance I have to rank you in the top 10% of posters to this thread.
But this all started because of the red herring that Squeaky threw in and you coming to his rescue with your infographic.

I was talking about the DISPARITY of wealth, e.g.
Almost half of California 2014 income taxes paid by top 1 percent
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article74271532.html#storylink=cpy

and

I tried to steer it back but you guys had an agenda so I let you roll with it while I threw out chum for your frenzy.



I was actually trying to get you to focus on
People produce more than they consume, or they don't.
When they produce more than they consume there is no need to subsidize their income.
When they are reliant on subsidized income for their consumption they can hardly be described as productive.

You argument via the linked web page that says California pays ~$10B more in federal taxes than they receive each year and is therefore not a drain on the federal gov't works directly against your quote above.

Since the crux of this (present) debate is money, don't you think it would be better to look at why the World's eight richest people have same wealth as poorest 50%?

This is why I say DISPARITY.
EDIT:

In 2015 it was The Richest 20 Own More Wealth Than Half The Population


Wealth inequality in the United States


CBO Chart, U.S. Holdings of Family Wealth 1989 to 2013. The top 10% of families held 76% of the wealth in 2013, while the bottom 50% of families held 1%. Inequality worsened from 1989 to 2013.[1]


If taxes, subsidization, and wealth redistribution are methods of equalization how do you explain this trend?
Red herring? Jesus you're retarded.

You've already had it explained to you and you run off and do the math (wrong) again...

Have a Happy Christmas man, your severely diminished mental capacity needs it.
 

MarWan

Well-Known Member
I think you're just too chickenshit to admit it. You have done so much blathering about how "Jews actually carried out the holocaust against themselves" and when called on it, you post a picture of a statue of a bull. I mean, what is the problem? It's not illegal to be an antisemitic nazi piece of shit. Why are you so afraid to admit it? Same reason you're afraid to off yourself?
That's the burden you've been carrying for a long time, after all aren't you God's chosen people, and yet you soon forget and disobey his commands and took a bull for a god to worship.
If God continues to punish you, don't blame us for that, instead blame yourselves.

Didn't the Israelite kill each other as a punishment after worshiping the Golden Bull? do you consider that incident a holocaust, are you going to blackmail God for it?

So do you see yourself following Mose's teachings, or the teachings of the great sorcerer who made the calf and build Wall Street, and promised you a dream that will never come true.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
That's the burden you've been carrying for a long time, after all aren't you God's chosen people, and yet you soon forget and disobey his commands and took a bull for a god to worship.
If God continues to punish you, don't blame us for that, instead blame yourselves.

Didn't the Israelite kill each other as a punishment after worshiping the Golden Bull? do you consider that incident a holocaust, are you going to blackmail God for it?

So do you see yourself following Mose's teachings, or the teachings of the great sorcerer who made the calf and build Wall Street, and promised you a dream that will never come true.
Dude, you couldn't be anymore transparently anti-semetic than you are right now...

Your swastika is showing.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
You said:
u r scared
half of trump's own cabinet has called him a fucking idiot and trump lets them stay.
do you have a point?
everyone knows trump is a fucking idiot.
who do you think will be indicted next?
no one likes you
You think this might be an answer to your question?

I know this about "old news", but since you guys have been doing cartwheels over 40 yo remembrances, I thought it well w/i the statute of limitations.

FBI Edits To Clinton Exoneration Go Far Beyond What Was Previously Known; Comey, McCabe, Strzok Implicated

Dec 15, 2017 10:10 PM

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has discovered that edits made to former FBI Director James Comey's statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified info over an unsecured, private email server went far beyond what was previously known, as detailed in a Thursday letter from committee chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) to FBI Director Christopher Wray.



James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok

The letter reveals specific edits made by senior FBI agents when Deputy Director Andrew McCabe exchanged drafts of Comey's statement with senior FBI officials, including Peter Strzok, Strzok's direct supervisor, E.W. "Bill" Priestap, Jonathan Moffa, and an unnamed employee from the Office of General Counsel (identified by Newsweek as DOJ Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson) - in what was a coordinated conspiracy among top FBI brass to decriminalize Clinton's conduct by changing legal terms and phrases, omitting key information, and minimizing the role of the Intelligence Community in the email investigation. Doing so virtually assured that then-candidate Hillary Clinton would not be prosecuted.
 

SneekyNinja

Well-Known Member
You said:



You think this might be an answer to your question?

I know this about "old news", but since you guys have been doing cartwheels over 40 yo remembrances, I thought it well w/i the statute of limitations.

FBI Edits To Clinton Exoneration Go Far Beyond What Was Previously Known; Comey, McCabe, Strzok Implicated

Dec 15, 2017 10:10 PM

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has discovered that edits made to former FBI Director James Comey's statement exonerating Hillary Clinton for transmitting classified info over an unsecured, private email server went far beyond what was previously known, as detailed in a Thursday letter from committee chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) to FBI Director Christopher Wray.



James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Peter Strzok

The letter reveals specific edits made by senior FBI agents when Deputy Director Andrew McCabe exchanged drafts of Comey's statement with senior FBI officials, including Peter Strzok, Strzok's direct supervisor, E.W. "Bill" Priestap, Jonathan Moffa, and an unnamed employee from the Office of General Counsel (identified by Newsweek as DOJ Deputy General Counsel Trisha Anderson) - in what was a coordinated conspiracy among top FBI brass to decriminalize Clinton's conduct by changing legal terms and phrases, omitting key information, and minimizing the role of the Intelligence Community in the email investigation. Doing so virtually assured that then-candidate Hillary Clinton would not be prosecuted.
Lol, ZeroHedge.

And it wasn't unsecured.

Try get the basic facts correct from a reputable source.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
Red herring? Jesus you're retarded.
You've already had it explained to you and you run off and do the math (wrong) again...
Have a Happy Christmas man, your severely diminished mental capacity needs it.
I just threw out the chum and attacked it like any blood crazed beast.

It shaping up to be a very Merry Christmas and scrappy Hanukka here . ;)
 
Top