Government claims it owns children, threatens 2nd mom with jail

Singlemalt

Singlemalt

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
See post above and feel free to answer the question I asked dandyrandy.
Click to expand...
I haven't read Buck's position on enforced liposuction so I'm not going to attribute that position to him. To my knowledge, the gov't only advises on obesity. Lipo is an elected procedure, only deluxe policies will pay for it. I've never heard of mandated lipo as it isn't known to be a "permanent" solution nor has it been proven to save lives. It's cosmetic
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Singlemalt said:
I haven't read Buck's position on enforced liposuction so I'm not going to attribute that position to him. To my knowledge, the gov't only advises on obesity. Lipo is an elected procedure, only deluxe policies will pay for it. I've never heard of mandated lipo as it isn't known to be a "permanent" solution nor has it been proven to save lives. It's cosmetic
Click to expand...
Okay same question, forced stomach stapling or forced feeding of a prisoner who is incarcerated for a victimless crime.
 
legalcanada

legalcanada

Well-Known Member
exactly. if the vaccinations actually work, the vaccinated children are at no risk so their parents should have no say. unvaccinated children are only a risk to eachother and their parents are aware of the risks... case closed
 
ChefKimbo

ChefKimbo

Well-Known Member
Birth Certificate = Trust Agreement

STATE OF (insert here)= ADMINISTRATOR(executor/grantor)

MOM/DAD = TRUSTEE(custodian). CUSTODIAL OBLIGATIONS TO THE BENEFICIARY, ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF TRUST AGREEMENT WITH ADMINISTRATOR

CHILD = BENEFICIARY, PROPERTY OF THE TRUSTEES PLEDGED TO THE ADMINISTRATOR ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT. GRANTED PRIVILEGES ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Maybe they aren't invasive to YOU. Should other people get to decide what is and isn't invasive regarding their own bodies ?

Would you advocate dismissing a persons religious rights and forcibly giving them a vaccine ?
Click to expand...
Religious rights is an oxymoron. Religion brainwashes people. Spirituality’s another story.

And, yeah. I would tell a Christian to shut the fuck up and stop trying to kill their child. Not “forcibly.” I’d order them to do it at risk of potential legal punishment. Compel, not force. Because it will keep their child healthy, and those children of others.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Do you even realize as late as our grandparents’ era, people were getting mumps and measles and fucking dying from it? Ever notice how that doesn’t really happen much anymore? People tend to think of those diseases as old school, or otherwise eradicated. Because we have innoculated at least 2-3 generations and increased life expectancy through preventing illnesses which are, redundantly, preventable.
 
Last edited:
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
If your wisdom teeth were impacted, would you leave them in for the sake of religion? I seriously doubt it. You’ll be snaggle-toothed from malocclusions and you’d be in pretty severe pain. Not even able to properly eat. But, even though just taking the fuckers out would prevent that, your God says “No!” Cool. I feel bad for you.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
tampee said:
Never, I'm actually a pretty good backyard veterinarian one dog had a nasty cyst and I cut it right out, another dog had an infection from a dog fight but I just gave him antibiotics and cleaned his wounds.

Fuck the vet it's $70 just to see them. I don't even go to doctors I got bit by a spider it ate a nice hole in my foot got some more black market antibiotics cured. :)
Click to expand...
tampee said:
I can fix bullet wounds and all as long as it doesn't hit any vital organs.
Click to expand...
Oy vey
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top