Mark Blyth, the economist who's making sense

[twostrokenut]

Given up on false equivalence?


Where does it say in the first amendment that white men can gang up to beat black men unconscious and then continue to beat him when he's down?

nice false equivalence.
you has the dumbs.

 

[UncleBuck]

what was "right wing" about Nazi Germany's economy again?

do you get paid to spam this neo-nazi crap or are you just plain retarded?

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party (/ˈnɑːtsi/), was a far-right political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945 and practised the ideology of Nazism.

nice false equivalence.
you has the dumbs.

tell that to deandre harris, you nazi loser.

those are your nazi buddies who just "have a different opinion" and are "practicing free speech".

 

[Fogdog]

nice false equivalence.
you has the dumbs.

Where in the first amendment does it say white men can beat black men nearly to death? Is this your form of free speech? I will admit the violence perpetrated by Nazis and KKK was a form of speech. So I get your point.

At this time, beating black people is not protected as speech under the first amendment. Maybe your Trump and GOP Congress will pack the Supreme Court enough to rule in your favor.

 

[twostrokenut]

do you get paid to spam this neo-nazi crap or are you just plain retarded?

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party (/ˈnɑːtsi/), was a far-right political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945 and practised the ideology of Nazism.




tell that to deandre harris, you nazi loser.

those are your nazi buddies who just "have a different opinion" and are "practicing free speech".

what about the Nazis economy was "far right" again and what would they have been able to accomplish without it?

any day now, thanks.

Where in the first amendment does it say white men can beat black men nearly to death? Is this your form of free speech? I will admit the violence perpetrated by Nazis and KKK was a form of speech. So I get your point.

At this time, beating black people is not protected as speech under the first amendment. Maybe your Trump and GOP Congress will pack the Supreme Court enough to rule in your favor.

emotions have gotten the better of you. in no post have I said physical violence equates to free speech.

but here you are all emo about it and drawing a racial divider to boot.

 

[UncleBuck]

what about the Nazis economy was "far right" again and what would they have been able to accomplish without it?

any day now, thanks.



emotions have gotten the better of you. in no post have I said physical violence equates to free speech.

but here you are all emo about it and drawing a racial divider to boot.

stop crying, holocaust denier.

the nazis were a far right wing party. every historian agrees. only paid neo-nazi spammers and retards disagree. which one are you?

 

[Fogdog]

what about the Nazis economy was "far right" again and what would they have been able to accomplish without it?

any day now, thanks.



emotions have gotten the better of you. in no post have I said physical violence equates to free speech.

but here you are all emo about it and drawing a racial divider to boot.

Dude. I'm just going with what you said.

your agenda couldn't be more transparent. I would wear a t shirt that reads "fuck these white power nazis" at any of these protests but will stand on the side of the first ammendment.

You started talking about the first amendment in the context of a permitted rally where safety plans were broken by the decisions and instructions of rally leaders. The asshat Nazis and KKK entered the park in opposition to previous plans that would have kept protesters and counter protesters separate. They spread out into the city when the protest was declared unlawful. All who are responsible and accountable for public safety in Charlottesville have said that the violence is entirely due to actions of the White supremacist protesters. END OF STORY.

What other meaning can there be when you invoke the first amendment other than you are claiming the violence was protected speech.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

By standing "on the side of the first amendment", how else can I interpret what you said other than that you see Nazis and KKK beating black people as some form of peaceable assembly?

I think you should reconsider. You are siding with murderous Nazis and KKK.

 

[ttystikk]

what was "right wing" about Nazi Germany's economy again?

War economy, slave labor, government subsidies, massive profits for the rich owners...

Sound familiar, by any chance?

 

[ttystikk]

do you get paid to spam this neo-nazi crap or are you just plain retarded?

The National Socialist German Workers' Party (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (help·info), abbreviated NSDAP), commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party (/ˈnɑːtsi/), was a far-right political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945 and practised the ideology of Nazism.




tell that to deandre harris, you nazi loser.

those are your nazi buddies who just "have a different opinion" and are "practicing free speech".

I'm gonna go with just plain retarded.

 

[ttystikk]

Dude. I'm just going with what you said.

You started talking about the first amendment in the context of a permitted rally where safety plans were broken by the decisions and instructions of rally leaders. The asshat Nazis and KKK entered the park in opposition to previous plans that would have kept protesters and counter protesters separate. They spread out into the city when the protest was declared unlawful. All who are responsible and accountable for public safety in Charlottesville have said that the violence is entirely due to actions of the White supremacist protesters. END OF STORY.

What other meaning can there be when you invoke the first amendment other than you are claiming the violence was protected speech.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

By standing "on the side of the first amendment", how else can I interpret what you said other than that you see Nazis and KKK beating black people as some form of peaceable assembly?

I think you should reconsider. You are siding with murderous Nazis and KKK.

Okay, retarded Nazi.

 

[UncleBuck]

War economy, slave labor, government subsidies, massive profits for the rich owners...

Sound familiar, by any chance?

LIKE

 

[twostrokenut]

War economy, slave labor, government subsidies, massive profits for the rich owners...

Sound familiar, by any chance?

indeed, they kept wages low also to help fight inflation.

 

[ttystikk]

indeed, they kept wages low also to help fight inflation.

Starving their citizens. Also sounds familiar.

Be proud to be a Nazi if you're going to work so hard to defend them.

 

[Fogdog]

Okay, retarded Nazi.

Did you just call me a Nazi? Retarded, OK, perhaps.

 

[twostrokenut]

Starving their citizens. Also sounds familiar.

Be proud to be a Nazi if you're going to work so hard to defend them.

Americans are far fatter than Nazi era germans.

identifying their economy as far left is hardly defending them.

and I am speaking in general, not specifically to Charlottesville.

 

[twostrokenut]

Dude. I'm just going with what you said.

You started talking about the first amendment in the context of a permitted rally where safety plans were broken by the decisions and instructions of rally leaders. The asshat Nazis and KKK entered the park in opposition to previous plans that would have kept protesters and counter protesters separate. They spread out into the city when the protest was declared unlawful. All who are responsible and accountable for public safety in Charlottesville have said that the violence is entirely due to actions of the White supremacist protesters. END OF STORY.

What other meaning can there be when you invoke the first amendment other than you are claiming the violence was protected speech.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

By standing "on the side of the first amendment", how else can I interpret what you said other than that you see Nazis and KKK beating black people as some form of peaceable assembly?

I think you should reconsider. You are siding with murderous Nazis and KKK.

your wall is not nessecary. I said I would stand on the side of free speech. when violence breaks out, you've left speech behind.

see, you jumped into a whole other level that was a false equivence.

 

[Fogdog]

your wall is not nessecary. I said I would stand on the side of free speech. when violence breaks out, you've left speech behind.

see, you jumped into a whole other level that was a false equivence.

So then we agree. Nazis started violence and were justly shut down.

 

[twostrokenut]

So then we agree. Nazis started violence and were justly shut down.

whomever got physical first.

 

[ttystikk]

Did you just call me a Nazi? Retarded, OK, perhaps.

No, i was agreeing with your analysis of the Nazi you discussed in your post.

 

[Fogdog]

whomever got physical first.

There is no doubt that Nazis were responsible.

 

[ttystikk]

There is no doubt that Nazis were responsible.

It would be easy, not to mention gratifying, to just go bust some heads.

The problem is that then they become martyrs to their kind.

Best to let them march around looking stupid, discrediting themselves.