Trying to stifle free speech is authoritarian.
hat's a way cool euphemism for literal nazis, padaraper.a group of people you disagree with politically
Just tiny vocal extremists. I wouldn't even dignify then with 'left'.It doesn't matter who they are or what they believe. Speech is constitutionally protected unless the law is being broken
The protection of the freedom of speech is fundamental to democracy
This is another example of how you and your friends try to twist things in an attempt to suit your own narrative because you have no other option since we win on the substance, every single time. It's not protecting the freedom of speech, it's defending nazis. It's not that all humans are animals and all animals have a herd like mentality, it's that only black people have a herd like mentality. It's not that I don't believe saying 'faggot' is wrong in the correct context because I don't associate it with homosexual people, it's that I'm just a homophobe. It's not that we disagree with Clinton and neoliberals, it's that we're just racist, sexist, Berniebros...
Your shtick is tired and boring. Everyone sees through it immediately and all examples of it can be quoted at the touch of a button for anyone to read themselves. I've had more than a handful of members PM me asking about each of these issues, I simply quote the posts where the accusations originate and they read them for themselves and 100% of the time have come away agreeing with me. You represent a tiny vocal fraction of the extreme left.
Good point. Authoritarian extremists? They're the equivalent of the people on the right who believe Obama is a Muslim that was born in Kenya and believe Benghazi was worse than 9/11Just tiny vocal extremists. I wouldn't even dignify then with 'left'.
That they're willing to denigrate the Founding Fathers themselves for not living up to standards that came centuries after their time, or saying that only those whom they approve of should be afforded the protections if the Bill of Rights tells me everything i need to know about their reactionary closeminded extremism.
Good point. Authoritarian extremists? They're the equivalent of the people on the right who believe Obama is a Muslim that was born in Kenya and believe Benghazi was worse than 9/11
LolJust tiny vocal extremists. I wouldn't even dignify then with 'left'.
That they're willing to denigrate the Founding Fathers themselves for not living up to standards that came centuries after their time, or saying that only those whom they approve of should be afforded the protections if the Bill of Rights tells me everything i need to know about their reactionary closeminded extremism.
"Self Defense, bro!"Nobody is going to watch your lame u tube vids, Nazi lover.
"Self Defense, bro!"
That person went from tough guy punching a "nazi" to Jusin-case faster than Trump hitting the golf course
If you can get arrested for punching someone you believe is a nazi, how could the violence you committed be self defense?Lol, you tube vids bro... You need to get out more.
escaping slavery used to be a crime too.If you can get arrested for punching someone you believe is a nazi, how could the violence you committed be self defense?
You don't normally get arrested for defending yourself
Well said.@Padawanbater2 :We're going to protect the rights of Nazis that want to oppress you and your families.
Thisthey're no longer in a position to do this. all my life i've heard nothing but humpf humpf 'business man' is what we needed from the right and fox. they wanted and they've received. their little sociology project is bust forever and a day. now they cant say anything about Sanders. fuckers. we had to go through Trump so Sanders wont be blocked on 'for all' government. we (they) had to see the dark side.
i don't expect anyone would argue it now so illogical..would you believe bucky crew already has?
I agree. Explain how assaulting someone demonstrating their right to free speech is comparable to jailing someone for escaping slavery?legality is a poor indicator of morality and correctness.
I agree. Explain how assaulting someone demonstrating their right to free speech is comparable to jailing someone for escaping slavery?
is their "free speech" a series of nazi salutes and chants meant to terrorize my jewish family?Explain how assaulting someone demonstrating their right to free speech is comparable to jailing someone for escaping slavery?
Most likely because that's a stupid question to ask, That'd be my guessI Maybe a bit off topic, but i must of asked a dozen people this question and couldnt get a response.
Would you be OK with isis setting up a recruitment booth at your local fair grounds?
Their free speech extends until they commit offensive violence. Not before that. Regardless of your appeal to emotion.is their "free speech" a series of nazi salutes and chants meant to terrorize my jewish family?
jesus christ curtis.
Yet you can't answer a simple question, dirty Curt.Most likely because that's a stupid question to ask, That'd be my guess
Their free speech extends until they commit offensive violence. Not before that. Regardless of your appeal to emotion.
Would I be OK with ISIS setting up a recruitment booth at my local fair grounds?Yet you can't answer a simple question, dirty Curt.