Thanks To 'Fight For $15' Minimum Wage, McDonald's Unveils Job-Replacing Self-Service Kiosks

see4

Well-Known Member
Then admit that you fuck up once in a while like I do. It would be nice to have a discussion with you once in a while where maybe a new topic could be touched upon here and there...for example; your taxing the rich while still leaving out the giant elephant in the room which is their access to easy credit, regardless of the taxes you would propose. You made a thread about it a few weeks ago, basic premise was "rich are careless with their excess capital and thus fuck shit up"....something along those lines.....

I don't want to discuss this topic here because you already have a thread about this authors article..... but you catch my drift. I think it was @see4 caught me on something a couple weeks ago, I admitted "you got me dude". This is how we move forward. It would be nice to have real discussions here from time to time.
I don't recall that. But my memory is hazy these days. Smoking far too much weed.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
It would be nice to have real discussions here from time to time.
then bring something real.

i used to try with you, but you would just come up with arguments like "if you make me serve purples, i'll just hate 'em more now".

and no, you conspiracies about all the jews at the federal reserve do not count either.
 

NLXSK1

Well-Known Member
Then admit that you fuck up once in a while like I do. It would be nice to have a discussion with you once in a while where maybe a new topic could be touched upon here and there...for example; your taxing the rich while still leaving out the giant elephant in the room which is their access to easy credit, regardless of the taxes you would propose. You made a thread about it a few weeks ago, basic premise was "rich are careless with their excess capital and thus fuck shit up"....something along those lines.....

I don't want to discuss this topic here because you already have a thread about this authors article..... but you catch my drift. I think it was @see4 caught me on something a couple weeks ago, I admitted "you got me dude". This is how we move forward. It would be nice to have real discussions here from time to time.
I recommend going some place that has some shred of non-biased moderation before you can expect that.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
Then admit that you fuck up once in a while like I do. It would be nice to have a discussion with you once in a while where maybe a new topic could be touched upon here and there...for example; your taxing the rich while still leaving out the giant elephant in the room which is their access to easy credit, regardless of the taxes you would propose. You made a thread about it a few weeks ago, basic premise was "rich are careless with their excess capital and thus fuck shit up"....something along those lines.....

I don't want to discuss this topic here because you already have a thread about this authors article..... but you catch my drift. I think it was @see4 caught me on something a couple weeks ago, I admitted "you got me dude". This is how we move forward. It would be nice to have real discussions here from time to time.
giphy (6).gif
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
then bring something real.

i used to try with you, but you would just come up with arguments like "if you make me serve purples, i'll just hate 'em more now".

and no, you conspiracies about all the jews at the federal reserve do not count either.
And there it is. You say "bring something real" and then come with that.

At no point have I mentioned the word Jew in one single discussion here at RIU ever unless someone else brought it up ridiculously as you have here. I have always held the Fed is an institution that each of us individuals support with individual endorsement, and advocated restrictive endorsement, regardless of religion, who runs the bank; whatever. I've stated our support is mostly Noticed, though implied consent through pure ignorance.

I'm a Libertarian and there's a paradigm with Civil Rights with us....not to say if this were Jim Crow I would not defy the law with a big "blacks only" sign in my establishment. Similarly with Unconstitutional Wars but I thank and appreciate the Vets.

And yet you troll on.

All this after losing your election for this exact shit, and you're not humbled one bit. Not a pound of humility or even the remotest possibility that you might be wrong in the slightest.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
I recommend going some place that has some shred of non-biased moderation before you can expect that.
I trust in the individual and will rely on their memories here. It may happen and if it is as you say, no effort wasted here either way.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
And there it is. You say "bring something real" and then come with that.

At no point have I mentioned the word Jew in one single discussion here at RIU ever unless someone else brought it up ridiculously as you have here. I have always held the Fed is an institution that each of us individuals support with individual endorsement, and advocated restrictive endorsement, regardless of religion, who runs the bank; whatever. I've stated our support is mostly Noticed, though implied consent through pure ignorance.

I'm a Libertarian and there's a paradigm with Civil Rights with us....not to say if this were Jim Crow I would not defy the law with a big "blacks only" sign in my establishment. Similarly with Unconstitutional Wars but I thank and appreciate the Vets.

And yet you troll on.

All this after losing your election for this exact shit, and you're not humbled one bit. Not a pound of humility or even the remotest possibility that you might be wrong in the slightest.
I trust in the individual and will rely on their memories here. It may happen and if it is as you say, no effort wasted here either way.
Hayes-350x237.png
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
You know, I heard you went on quite the "Guido" tirade on here at RIU. I don't know if you admitted you fucked up but would you like me to follow you around and remind you of this at every post you make? How about I just make something up entirely and do the same?

But you're down with that, and emphasize it as valuable somehow; even as entertainment. I simply don't share this sentiment with you but will admit that it sometimes is slightly amusing to take some poo off my shoulder, and throw it back at you.
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
You know, I heard you went on quite the "Guido" tirade on here at RIU. I don't know if you admitted you fucked up but would you like me to follow you around and remind you of this at every post you make? How about I just make something up entirely and do the same?

But you're down with that, and emphasize it as valuable somehow; even as entertainment. I simply don't share this sentiment with you but will admit that it sometimes is slightly amusing to take some poo off my shoulder, and throw it back at you.
:sleep:

You scared, trailer trash?

massage.jpg
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You know, I heard you went on quite the "Guido" tirade on here at RIU. I don't know if you admitted you fucked up but would you like me to follow you around and remind you of this at every post you make? How about I just make something up entirely and do the same?

But you're down with that, and emphasize it as valuable somehow; even as entertainment. I simply don't share this sentiment with you but will admit that it sometimes is slightly amusing to take some poo off my shoulder, and throw it back at you.
remember that time when you called jews "middle men"?

jew-hating racist.
 

Lucky Luke

Well-Known Member
Wouldn't matter what the min wage was/is. Its always cheaper to industrialize. No red tape no dealing with staff and no having to hire/fire and deal with people.
If thats all you got then ill point you in the direction of the Industrial revolution and also let you research countries with a minimum wage that actually is tied to inflation.

P.S Trickle down economics does not work...never has. But the very rich keep telling us that it does..i wonder why?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Says all you need to know about pooey popsicle's 'pseudo-dad', folks:

Member Since:
Apr 5, 2013
Messages:
5,100
Likes Received:
833
Trophy Points:
178

View attachment 3848259
he has never been able to sexually satisfy a woman in his entire life, so he takes out his impotent anger on jews, black people, minorities, women, you name it.

behavior like his is the mark of a highly insecure individual.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
literally everyone knows you are a jew-hating racist.

View attachment 3848260
remember that time when you called jews "middle men"?

jew-hating racist.
Timeline.....You post pics of yourself here in which you appear to have a bald spot and a mullet.
You tell me you're jewish.

I support lots of Jewish Authors, I have named many. As far as Jews being middle men; I assume you have read the "are jews generic" essay by Thomas Sowell.

Wiki:
"In the collection's second essay, Sowell explores the origins of antisemitism among those harboring jealousy toward Jews for their financial and entrepreneurial successes.

Sowell argues that the jealousy is historically quite common among ethnic groups who have had historic success as economic "middlemen" who derive a profit from the service of bringing needed items to the marketplace. Among other historically persecuted "middlemen minorities" were Lebanese and Chinese immigrant merchants. The resentment is due to a perceived "lack of added value" that these middlemen provide, as it is not easily observable."


Too much to ask to give the member I addressed the chance to respond before you throw a thread closing tantrum?
 

Big_Lou

Well-Known Member
I trust in the individual and will rely on their memories here. It may happen and if it is as you say, no effort wasted here either way.
I support lots of Jewish Authors, I have named many. As far as Jews being middle men; I assume you have read the "are jews generic" essay by Thomas Sowell.

Wiki:
"In the collection's second essay, Sowell explores the origins of antisemitism among those harboring jealousy toward Jews for their financial and entrepreneurial successes.

Sowell argues that the jealousy is historically quite common among ethnic groups who have had historic success as economic "middlemen" who derive a profit from the service of bringing needed items to the marketplace. Among other historically persecuted "middlemen minorities" were Lebanese and Chinese immigrant merchants. The resentment is due to a perceived "lack of added value" that these middlemen provide, as it is not easily observable."


Too much to ask to give the member I addressed the chance to respond before you throw a thread closing tantrum?
Clean that shambling trailer you call 'home', nasty pig....

giphy (6).gif
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
As far as Jews being middle men; I assume you have read Thomas Sowell.
no, i am not racist against black people, so i do not read thomas sowell. unlike you.

So how does using the word Niglet make you racist!!!!
It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it. — Thomas Sowell
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
no, i am not racist against black people, so i do not read thomas sowell. unlike you.
Translation: Thomas Sowell, in addition to being an economist, social theorist, political philosopher and author...........is also a racist.

 
Last edited:
Top