RIU poll Trump VS Clinton

choomer

Well-Known Member
you have one thing right, it is smart not to make a $5,000 bet against me on the proposition that hillary wins and trump loses. but only because clinton has the election on complete and total lockdown.
<BSWIFF>
PUSSY
Whoa meltdown Mary!

Take a breath and enjoy another classic Zappa example of the Buckold:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Whoa meltdown Mary!

Take a breath and enjoy another classic Zappa example of the Buckold:
no matter how you try, you cannot change the subject from the fact that you are a pussy who is all talk, and refuses to put his money where his mouth is.

assuming you even have any money at all. my guess is that you collect food stamps, medicaid, and more.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
no matter how you try, you cannot change the subject from the fact that you are a pussy who is all talk, and refuses to put his money where his mouth is.
assuming you even have any money at all. my guess is that you collect food stamps, medicaid, and more.
Isn't the entire reason for this thread proving your assumptions and guesses wrong?
<I'm channeling Catfish here>
  1. Trump
    152 vote(s)
    62.8%
  2. Clinton
    90 vote(s)
    37.2%
I have no interest in taking money from the woman that supports you, she has you to deal with and that's enough.
 

tangerinegreen555

Well-Known Member
Isn't the entire reason for this thread proving your assumptions and guesses wrong?
<I'm channeling Catfish here>
  1. Trump
    152 vote(s)
    62.8%
  2. Clinton
    90 vote(s)
    37.2%
I have no interest in taking money from the woman that supports you, she has you to deal with and that's enough.
Let me guess, choomer the testicle free trump eunuch doesn't even fucking vote.

Except in online polls with his socks.

#onlineirritation
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Isn't the entire reason for this thread proving your assumptions and guesses wrong?
<I'm channeling Catfish here>
  1. Trump
    152 vote(s)
    62.8%
  2. Clinton
    90 vote(s)
    37.2%
I have no interest in taking money from the woman that supports you, she has you to deal with and that's enough.
she doesn't get paid in cash, like the $10,000 i posted previously.

you can try to think of new and inventive ways to pussy out of this bet, but every time you do it reinforces what we all know: you are a coward, you know you are going to lose, and you refuse to lose a single penny of your welfare check on it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
oh, and @choomer is definitely a repressed latent homosexual.

i'm thinking of making my sig an ode to his over-defensiveness regarding his uber-fragile sexuality.

no one is more heterosexual than he is, according to him.
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
she doesn't get paid in cash, like the $10,000 i posted previously.
you can try to think of new and inventive ways to pussy out of this bet, but every time you do it reinforces what we all know: you are a coward, you know you are going to lose, and you refuse to lose a single penny of your welfare check on it.
Buckold, You have not only your personal history to blame, but that of your adopted doctrine.
 

LSD-25

Well-Known Member
Trump is a good guy. he tells the truth. he is NOT a racist. he's a patriot. yeah he said some shit. so what. Hillary defended a 42 year old man that put a 12 year old girl in a coma for 4 days. rape her so bad she cant have kids. listen to the recording of her laughing about how she got him off with 2 months in jail.. then try and figure out how the Clintons left office broke as a joke, and now have over 300 million dollars in their PERSONAL banks accounts. Their politicians... how the fuck would they make that kind of money? What product are they selling? ill tell you what they are selling..... our country.. wake the f#^&CK up people!!! the democrats whole campaign is based on a lie. A mere opinion of Trumps character. Anybody can take a bunch of soundbytes that have been taken over 20 years of someone in the "limelight". and make him or her look not so good. but the bottom line is Donald Trump is doing this for Us. think about it. being potus DOES NOT make you a billionaire. making the right moves, working hard, and being likable, selling yourself, these are the things that make a person successful. Not making 45 min. speeches for 2 million bucks. Or selling our foreign policy to warlords overseas.. like the Clintons do. Trump!!!!!!!!!!
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Buckold, You have not only your personal history to blame, but that of your adopted doctrine.
i'm sorry, i couldn't hear you over your deafening pussified refusal to put your money where your mouth is, coward.

that is, if you even have $5,000 to spare. like i do.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Trump is a good guy. he tells the truth. he is NOT a racist. he's a patriot. yeah he said some shit. so what. Hillary defended a 42 year old man that put a 12 year old girl in a coma for 4 days. rape her so bad she cant have kids. listen to the recording of her laughing about how she got him off with 2 months in jail.. then try and figure out how the Clintons left office broke as a joke, and now have over 300 million dollars in their PERSONAL banks accounts. Their politicians... how the fuck would they make that kind of money? What product are they selling? ill tell you what they are selling..... our country.. wake the f#^&CK up people!!! the democrats whole campaign is based on a lie. A mere opinion of Trumps character. Anybody can take a bunch of soundbytes that have been taken over 20 years of someone in the "limelight". and make him or her look not so good. but the bottom line is Donald Trump is doing this for Us. think about it. being potus DOES NOT make you a billionaire. making the right moves, working hard, and being likable, selling yourself, these are the things that make a person successful. Not making 45 min. speeches for 2 million bucks. Or selling our foreign policy to warlords overseas.. like the Clintons do. Trump!!!!!!!!!!
hey, is your sister available next saturday?

or do you already have dibs on her?
 

choomer

Well-Known Member
oh, and @choomer is definitely a repressed latent homosexual.
i'm thinking of making my sig an ode to his over-defensiveness regarding his uber-fragile sexuality.
no one is more heterosexual than he is, according to him.
Go to town.
There are plenty who would view it as a badge of honor.
@StillNotGOP 's posts catch my eye a little more now you are trying to "sig shame" him.

Seems this:

"Authorities have not yet sought a search warrant for the emails, law enforcement sources told CNN. Government lawyers hope to secure a search warrant to permit investigators to review thousands of emails on a computer Abedin shared with her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, officials said.

The new search warrant is needed because the existing authorization, covered by a subpoena, related only to the ongoing investigation of Weiner, who is accused of having sexually explicit communications with an underage girl.

The investigators saw enough of the emails to determine that they appeared pertinent to the previously completed investigation and that they may be emails not previously reviewed.

Because they don't have a warrant specific to Abedin's emails, officials have not been able to further examine them. Justice Department and FBI officials view Abedin as cooperative with the investigation."

is causing this:
upload_2016-10-31_7-42-52.png
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Go to town.
There are plenty who would view it as a badge of honor.
@StillNotGOP 's posts catch my eye a little more now you are trying to "sig shame" him.

Seems this:

"Authorities have not yet sought a search warrant for the emails, law enforcement sources told CNN. Government lawyers hope to secure a search warrant to permit investigators to review thousands of emails on a computer Abedin shared with her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner, officials said.

The new search warrant is needed because the existing authorization, covered by a subpoena, related only to the ongoing investigation of Weiner, who is accused of having sexually explicit communications with an underage girl.

The investigators saw enough of the emails to determine that they appeared pertinent to the previously completed investigation and that they may be emails not previously reviewed.

Because they don't have a warrant specific to Abedin's emails, officials have not been able to further examine them. Justice Department and FBI officials view Abedin as cooperative with the investigation."

is causing this:
View attachment 3818849
are you literally mentally retarded?

this happened yesterday, its effects in the polls are yet to be seen.

and if you think a single tracking poll of the inconsequential popular vote is particularly pertinent or eye opening, then you may suffer from hillary derangement syndrome.

i'd advise for you to see a doctor, but they can't fix stupid or teach basic statistical principles.

i really should be focusing on your obvious mental defects rather than your obvious latent homosexual desires, but you just get so defensive about the latter, and it gets tiresome to mock you for the former.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Melt down Mary baited again. :D
this is why i pick on you for your latent homosexuality now.

i just put together a very nice post about your complete inability to read polls. you claimed that hillary's poll numbers are dropping over this non-event, then you cite a single poll whose data does not even include any polling from the time after the non-event.

that is what is called stupid. you are not even smart enough to know it, either.

whose stupid now?
 

LSD-25

Well-Known Member
i really should be focusing on your obvious mental defects rather than your obvious latent homosexual desires, but you just get so defensive about the latter, and it gets tiresome to mock you for the former.
that's the LLLLLOOOOONNNNNGGGGG way of calling someone a gay retard lol..
this is why i pick on you for your latent homosexuality now.

i just put together a very nice post about your complete inability to read polls. you claimed that hillary's poll numbers are dropping over this non-event, then you cite a single poll whose data does not even include any polling from the time after the non-event.

that is what is called stupid. you are not even smart enough to know it, either.

whose stupid now, motherfucker?
What's all this talk about polls? polls dont mean shit... everybody who's been around for the last 6 or more elections knows that.. those poll are nothing but a lie fed to you by the media. it represents a very small number of people who vote.
 
Top