abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
So did MacArthur.Not sure why Mr. Eisenhower thought they where ready give up.
So did MacArthur.Not sure why Mr. Eisenhower thought they where ready give up.
Replace Japanese with Americans in this argument and it still works. The problem is that it still doesn't justify a massacre against civilians.The U.S. and Russia were on the same side. The Japanese treated POW's worse than anyone. Imperial Japan was very racist and shared that ideology with the nazis. Ask the Chinese or Filipinos what the Japanese did to them. The Japanese considered other races subhuman and many are still very racist.
The only one here saying xenophobia is you, after you incorrectly termed what I described as such. You then raised a straw man about racism. As for subjective accounts, every rebuttal you gave to someone who lost three uncles in that war - to show her she was wrong, on an undisputed point of recent history, such wow - consisted of one or more such. Are your standards just for - others, not yourself?Well I won't tell you any biased stories about Afghanis or Iraqis. I certainly won't use subjective accounts or xenophobia to justify massacre which was objectively unnecessary. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were retaliation and a show of force to scare the Russians.
I call it like I see it, but you confirmed it. You believe xenophobia is intrinsic to human nature, but also think that social anthropology is pseudoscience.The only one here saying xenophobia is you.
Video or SRL? I shoot a D3 in a Subal.I have been diving in Coron for the last two weeks. I have been saturated with WW2 history as well as nitrogen.View attachment 3737316 View attachment 3737318
My grandfather fought in that war too, B17 turret gunner.
You think Americans aren't encouraged to rape? They're given space and time to do so, and only punished if their unit needs some reason to discipline, using it as a reason to slap a soldier's wrist. Just look how often female soldiers are raped vs how often their rapists are punished.Not hardly. The Imperialist Japanese government encouraged the rape of Filipino women and torture of POWs. Not everything is equal. The Japanese stole land and conquered other people in a very open and brutal way.
Micro 4/3 only.Video or SRL? I shoot a D3 in a Subal.
When you understand them, fine.understanding the role genetics play.
No. I have corrected you on this time and again. YOU introduced the word and continue to use it in Big Lie tactics familiar to any student of history. I said that what I believe intrinsic to human nature is schematization, which you have dishonestly equated with xenophobia. Stop this lie.I call it like I see it, but you confirmed it. You believe xenophobia is intrinsic to human nature, but also think that social anthropology is pseudoscience.
I'm no xenophobic, that shit ain't in my nature at all.
#334Yes, I do believe humans are essentially xenophobes...
The pros rely on luck more then you know.View attachment 3737333 View attachment 3737334 View attachment 3737335
Last one's bright at the top but still a good image imo. I'm not pro.
Ouch#334
And to be clear, I never called you racist.Ouch
I retract that. It is true by one definition of the word, the old one, "a fear or dislike of the unknown or strange". I do not say that the currently more common one, "a fear of people of other races and countries" is inherent. I hope that clarifies.
Maybe because he was the general but you were the cabin boi?One of the coolest stories, was when they found out the war had been over for weeks. Only then did they have the resolve to revolt.
Not sure why Mr. Eisenhower thought they where ready give up.
I rely on my buoyancy skills but I have seen some sick macro stuff done with strobes and kick ass lenses using aperture priority. Reds wash out below 10 meters depth so I use a red filter and no lights. Sometimes I use the auto settings on aquatic mode, a preset. My filter is on a swivel for that. I also use a wet wide angle dome.The pros rely on luck more then you know.
That is debatable with the double meaning of the term. But after my mistake I am disinclined to split that hair.And to be clear, I never called you racist.
Ouch
I retract that. It is true by one definition of the word, the old one, "a fear or dislike of the unknown or strange". I do not say that the currently more common one, "a fear of people of other races and countries" is inherent. I hope that clarifies.
The only one here saying xenophobia is you, after you incorrectly termed what I described as such. You then raised a straw man about racism. As for subjective accounts, every rebuttal you gave to someone who lost three uncles in that war - to show her she was wrong, on an undisputed point of recent history, such wow - consisted of one or more such. Are your standards just for - others, not yourself?
With every post, a discharge of laughing gas from a stilted paper ass.That is debatable with the double meaning of the term. But after my mistake I am disinclined to split that hair.
My recruiter was Station Chief in Khartoum. Are you currently in country?an interesting book originally written in Japanese by Japanese historians in 1965 titled "Japan’s Longest Day" covers the events and thinking re:surrender from Japan's Supreme War Council's perspective during July and August.