kmog33
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the links. I'm going to have to go over all of this before i can intelligently respond lol. But I think I get the gist of it. I think I'll also look into summer daylight cycles in regards to uv intensity/time of day/etc.Ah I see... I know some flower greenhouses here in NL do use UV to intensify colors and others to reduce pesticide (I think it was UVC against botrytis/budrot) and that use of UV is referenced in led studies but haven't see those or other uv leds specified yet, I think it's still tubes in practice.
I think investing in UVB instead of UVA (hardens plants basically) can be much more effective in terms of results, final product.
Another good article:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/opph.201400048/asset/34_ftp.pdf
It is specifically low levels of UVB that can change and increase production of secondary metabolites, which include cannabinoids, flavonoids and terpenes. In a study of the uni of Wageningen they suggest the increase in secondary metabolites can be useful for growing "herbs".
Introduction to secondary metabolites in cannabis:
https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/13206/01.pdf
Too high levels can have the opposite effect so I think starting with that 12-15 uvb on 3x3 is not a bad idea. Maybe even put it on a separate timer, or pulses...
Am I misunderstanding that while small amounts of uvb are beneficial and harden the plant, going overboard by a small margin causes more detrimental effects and reduces the benefits it does provide. So it's better to be low than high when adding uv spectra, and it doesn't seem to take much at all in a small environment to give all the perks uv in general is able to anyway.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk