Indictment Countdown...

Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Yes
She didn't violate Any laws
Click to expand...
You are just a troll then.

She obviously broke federal law. I have cited the law that says it is unlawful to retain sensitive state documents on an unauthorized server in an unauthorized location.

You seem to think it is a plus that she has been accused so many times and is still standing.

I think her history shows how powerful her and bill are. They are the definition of corrupt.

Law does not apply to them.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
You are just a troll then.

She obviously broke federal law. I have cited the law that says it is unlawful to retain sensitive state documents on an unauthorized server in an unauthorized location.

You seem to think it is a plus that she has been accused so many times and is still standing.

I think her history shows how powerful her and bill are. They are the definition of corrupt.

Law does not apply to them.
Click to expand...
OBVIOUS?
WHAT ARE YOU THE FIRST WELFARE COLLECTING SCHOLAR OF LAW AND AN ATTORNEY?
1500 FBI AGENTS AND A YEAR IN INVESTIGATING.
IF IT IS SO FUCKING OBVIOUS, WHY HASNT SHE BEEN CHARGED WITH ANYTHING.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Right...

like I haven't heard that and answered it 50 fuckin times...

Seeing as how you don't even know what property is or who can own it, it is clear why all of this is beyond your ability to comprehend. Let me make it simple, anarchocapitalism is an oxymoron because property rights come from gov't.

Also, while you're looking up the word property, look up consent. It's another word you constantly misuse, like when you insist children can consent to have sex with you.
Click to expand...
I'm sorry you're so angry and your intellect has been temporarily stifled by your pompousity. Eating morning after cold pizza crusts in your moms basement and arguing with a Sasquatch on the internet won't lead to your self suffiency y'know.

It's sad that you claim to be an anarchist and then you contradict yourself by vesting power in a hierarchy backed by force.

Can a person delegate a right they do not possess ? (you won't answer that one will you?)


Also, you never said what property is...you've claimed that the right to it comes from government, which does not answer the question.

People have a kind of right to control themselves, as if they were their own property.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
OBVIOUS?
WHAT ARE YOU THE FIRST WELFARE COLLECTING SCHOLAR OF LAW AND AN ATTORNEY?
1500 FBI AGENTS AND A YEAR IN INVESTIGATING.
IF IT IS SO FUCKING OBVIOUS, WHY HASNT SHE BEEN CHARGED WITH ANYTHING.
Click to expand...
Because the investigation is not over dumb ass!
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I'm sorry you're so angry and your intellect has been temporarily stifled by your pompousity. Eating morning after cold pizza crusts in your moms basement and arguing with a Sasquatch on the internet won't lead to your self suffiency y'know.

It's sad that you claim to be an anarchist and then you contradict yourself by vesting power in a hierarchy backed by force.

Can a person delegate a right they do not possess ? (you won't answer that one will you?)


Also, you never said what property is...you've claimed that the right to it comes from government, which does not answer the question.

People have a kind of right to control themselves, as if they were their own property.
Click to expand...
You still didn't actually say anything of value. You're just going on and on in the same way you always do. Nobody takes you seriously, which actually works out in your favor, since they would likely be opposed to pedophilia.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
If you read this, give my post a like.

Lets see who actually reads here.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/26/opinions/clinton-email-server-ig-report-opinion-cox/
Click to expand...
OPINION?
ANYTHING ELSE EBT QUEEN?
BTW WHY DONT YOU READ THIS PART FROM YOUR OWN "STELLAR SOURCE"

Despite the inspector general's report, criminal charges against Clinton remain highly unlikely. While the report provides previously nonpublic information relevant to Clinton's motivations, the available public evidence remains insufficient to illustrate two facts needed for a criminal charge -- that she knew that emails on her private server were classified and that she intentionally mishandled classified information.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
You are just a troll then.

She obviously broke federal law. I have cited the law that says it is unlawful to retain sensitive state documents on an unauthorized server in an unauthorized location.

You seem to think it is a plus that she has been accused so many times and is still standing.

I think her history shows how powerful her and bill are. They are the definition of corrupt.

Law does not apply to them.
Click to expand...

He's also a prohibitionist because he has advocated laws which criminalize cannabis related behavior.
 
Flaming Pie

Flaming Pie

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
OPINION?
ANYTHING ELSE EBT QUEEN?
BTW WHY DONT YOU READ THIS PART FROM YOUR OWN "STELLAR SOURCE"

Despite the inspector general's report, criminal charges against Clinton remain highly unlikely. While the report provides previously nonpublic information relevant to Clinton's motivations, the available public evidence remains insufficient to illustrate two facts needed for a criminal charge -- that she knew that emails on her private server were classified and that she intentionally mishandled classified information.
Click to expand...
The fbi is still investigating. Read the whole article.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Yet, you are afraid to engage me in a real discussion and cannot answer some questions which aren't silly or kidding around.


What is property and who can own it ?

Can a person delegate a right they do not possess ?
Click to expand...
Were you born with clownshoes on or do you just repeat yourself incessantly? Property is a word that can be found in a dictionary, do you have one of those? While you're looking that up, look up consent.

As for the last silly question as well as the second part of the prior, since it is clearly an example of you kidding around, gov't is the source of property rights and all of the property that the gov't grants to private citizens was taken by force from its original inhabitants. If you dispute this fact, I suggest an approach without stupid ass rhetorical questions. Either that or you can find the descendants of the native Americans who dwelled on your land before the US gov't killed them and give it back to them.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
Were you born with clownshoes on or do you just repeat yourself incessantly? Property is a word that can be found in a dictionary, do you have one of those? While you're looking that up, look up consent.

As for the last silly question as well as the second part of the prior, since it is clearly an example of you kidding around, gov't is the source of property rights and all of the property that the gov't grants to private citizens was taken by force from its original inhabitants. If you dispute this fact, I suggest an approach without stupid ass rhetorical questions. Either that or you can find the descendants of the native Americans who dwelled on your land before the US gov't killed them and give it back to them.
Click to expand...

So, who can delegate a right they don't possess ?

What is property and who can own it ?


I seem to have missed your answers in that dancing sidestep.



Also if you don't think property can be passed on or owned, why would I give it to the descendents of people who died
hundreds of years ago ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top