Why is the US South such a backwards shithole?

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I know for a fact there are still uncontacted peoples living just Like their ancestors from thousands of years ago in many parts of the world.

I'm not sure about the Congo or Africa, but their certinly is in South America.

And my point stands because Mohammad had sex with his 9 year old bride and about 2 billion people think he is the most moral human to ever live.
That's pre-contact, idiot. So if nobody has met them, how can you know of them? What you are displaying is false confidence.

In any case, the modern world is quite a bit different from the neolithic one you describe. In this world, life is not short and there is no need to start making babies as soon as possible. In fact, babies are quite expensive to raise and early pregnancy is almost dead certain to lead to poverty for both the child and the mother. Not only that but it makes it very difficult for the mother to get the necessary education for her to reach her full potential. Which is what the modern world needs. Not barefoot and pregnant teens, but well educated and productive women who choose the timing of their children to make the best situation for both.

So don't quote some old text written by a man who claimed to talk to a supernatural being and say if it's good for the prophet, its good for me. That was about 1600 years ago. If you lived then, you'd be in perv heaven. All the boys and girls you could afford.

But now? Keep your sweaty little salesman hands off those kids. In today's world its not okay.

Its people like you that make the south seem backward and an ugly place.
 
Last edited:

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
That's pre-contact, idiot. So if nobody has met them, how can you know of them? What you are displaying is false confidence.

In any case, the modern world is quite a bit different from the neolithic one you describe. In this world, life is not short and there is no need to start making babies as soon as possible. In fact, babies are quite expensive to raise and early pregnancy is almost dead certain to lead to poverty for both the child and the mother. Not only that but it makes it very difficult for the mother to get the necessary education for her to reach her full potential. Which is what the modern world needs. Not barefoot and pregnant teens, but well educated and productive women who choose the timing of their children to make the best situation for both.

So don't quote some old text written by a man who claimed to talk to a supernatural being and say if it's good for the prophet, its good for me. That was about 1600 years ago. If you lived then, you'd be in perv heaven. All the boys and girls you could afford.

But now? Keep your sweaty little salesman hands off those kids. In today's world its not okay.

Its people like you that make the south seem backward and an ugly place.
I'm not saying that they do screw their 10 year olds. ImI'm saying that if they do it might not be wrong for them to the same way it is wrong for us to do so.

Keep in mind. In Mexico right now, the age of consent is 12. They judge 12 year olds capable of deciding to have sex with adults.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
I'm not saying that they do screw their 10 year olds. ImI'm saying that if they do it might not be wrong for them to the same way it is wrong for us to do so.

Keep in mind. In Mexico right now, the age of consent is 12. They judge 12 year olds capable of deciding to have sex with adults.
No, man, pedophilia is not something that was ever okay. No matter the era, it damaged kids. In today's world, there is nothing that can make up for that damage. Fucking children harms their lives forever.
 

ThickStemz

Well-Known Member
No, man, pedophilia is not something that was ever okay. No matter the era, it damaged kids. In today's world, there is nothing that can make up for that damage. Fucking children harms their lives forever.
Strictly speaking, sex with and attraction to girls of that age isn't pedophilia. It is hebephilia.

Morals are societal constructs. More societies have deemed it acceptable than have not. That may be impossible to know, but a great many have, if not most.

I'm not some God believer who thinks morals are absolute and the same no matter what. They're different. There are and have been societies where this was the norm and that is undeniable.

That calls your grave harm theory into question.
 

CrocodileStunter

Well-Known Member
I can't believe I've been banned off this site probably 50 times for shit such as using comic sans or using the word fagz but dude gets to stay on here defending pedophilia. I've been ip banned at least 5 times and I'm pretty sure I never was talking about having sex with kids. oh @rollitup how I love how banning works around here.
 

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
Wordz you have been banned many times for refusing to listen to us when we tell you what you have done that was inappropriate here. When you continue to do it, we have no choice but to get rid of you. This profile has lasted 5 months already, so you're starting to figure it out.

Congratulations! :roll:

:mrgreen:
 

CrocodileStunter

Well-Known Member
Wordz you have been banned many times for refusing to listen to us when we tell you what you have done that was inappropriate here. When you continue to do it, we have no choice but to get rid of you. This profile has lasted 5 months already, so you're starting to figure it out.

Congratulations! :roll:

:mrgreen:
youthful indiscretions.... I just wanna be able to see the pictures can't do that when banned. You know i love ya'll
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Strictly speaking, sex with and attraction to girls of that age isn't pedophilia. It is hebephilia.

Morals are societal constructs. More societies have deemed it acceptable than have not. That may be impossible to know, but a great many have, if not most.

I'm not some God believer who thinks morals are absolute and the same no matter what. They're different. There are and have been societies where this was the norm and that is undeniable.

That calls your grave harm theory into question.
Fuck that relative morality bullshit. What people once thought was OK is irrelevant. We know much more about the development of the brain and how children grow into adults. Sex causes very powerful hormones to be released in the brain which affect the the way the brain develops. It also causes the child to become attached to that predator in ways that were meant for him or her to become attached to their partner in life. The child might or might not go on and have normal relationships but the development of the child is affected. That is harm by any measure you want. So, just like many other practices of the past, such as beating the child for punishment, we now know that it is harmful to the child and almost certainly affects them in negative ways for life.

An adult harming a child by having sex with them is wrong and is always wrong regardless of the situation.
 
Last edited:
Top