GOP Tax Plans Would Be the Largest Redistributions to the Rich in American History

[NLXSK1]

regular taxpayers are those >$250k

You just said that regular taxpaers are those above $250,000.

Does Bernie promise all people making under a quarter million dollars to be tax free? I think that is where his 63% tax bracket kicks in.... He aint promising anything close to that yet he is still your hero... LOL!!

 

[NLXSK1]

regular taxpayers are those >$250k..do you know how many taxpayers make >$25k? i've read his plan (what little there is) and it's a shell game..those >$25k account for a ton of tax dollars..how is he going to replace it?

WTF??? How are you going to replace everything below 250K??

 

[schuylaar]

You just said that regular taxpaers are those above $250,000.

omg math fail..damn..do you not know your signs?..i think that was 1st grade.

 

[NLXSK1]

omg math fail..damn..do you not know your signs?..i think that was 1st grade.

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=greater sign

You fail again Schuylaar. I wonder why you try sometimes.

You wanted the less than sign showing the 250K was the larger of the two.

 

[schuylaar]

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=greater sign

You fail again Schuylaar. I wonder why you try sometimes.

You wanted the less than sign showing the 250K was the larger of the two.

you need to read the post again.

 

[MuyLocoNC]

welcome to AMT(alternative minimum tax)..it sucks and the only ones who win at the game are those who stack the deck against us..talk about getting the woody..all the while profitable corps pay NO taxes.

Mmm, actually corporations have employees and management paid by the services/products that the corporation sells. Every dime of those salaries/wages are taxed. Likewise, the profits that are paid out to stockholders are also taxed. What you're all bunged up about is that they are minimizing the "double taxation" that they shouldn't be paying in the first place. Corporate tax should be zero.

 

[NLXSK1]

you need to read the post again.

You wrote "regular taxpayers are those >$250k"

This is read as 'Regular taxpayers are those making MORE THAN $250,000'

What you meant was "regular taxpayers are those making < $250K"

Which is read as 'Regular taxpayers are those making less than $250K'


You still probably havent figured out that you were wrong with 'sow'

Apology not expected.

 

[UncleBuck]

Corporate tax should be zero.

it's not gonna happen, but you can cry some more. it's hilarious to watch.

 

[UncleBuck]

healthcare isn't a right

you only have a right to die in the gutter.

clearly, you are so bitter and hateful that you are on pace to have "the big one" pretty soon. no human heart can handle that much hate for so long.

i'm sure that when you do, and your savings from selling used cars and hanging curtains runs out, you will be adamant that you should be left to die for lack of funds to afford the quadruple bypass/heart transplant.

in fact, i am certain of it.

 

[NLXSK1]

The OP title is 180 degrees from the truth.

When you take money from one person and give it to another it is called re-distribution. That is what the government is doing now.

Letting a business or individual keep MORE of their money is not re-distribution.

 

[Moldy]

Well, you have the option of not taking advantage of their services. They didn't cause the problem you're seeking their services to remedy, they have no responsibility for your recovery past your payment for such. Dying and/or living in pain is always an option...and it's cheap.

Like I said, their services are over priced/valued. I guess you'll fucking understand when your health goes to hell and you have to sell the farm to pay for it. Healthcare needs a major overhauling and if you think its a wonderful thing then you've never had to use it.

 

[schuylaar]

You wrote "regular taxpayers are those >$250k"

This is read as 'Regular taxpayers are those making MORE THAN $250,000'

What you meant was "regular taxpayers are those making < $250K"

Which is read as 'Regular taxpayers are those making less than $250K'


You still probably havent figured out that you were wrong with 'sow'

Apology not expected.

can someone PLEASE teach him the signs before he makes more of a fool of himself?

 

[schuylaar]

The OP title is 180 degrees from the truth.

When you take money from one person and give it to another it is called re-distribution. That is what the government is doing now.

Letting a business or individual keep MORE of their money is not re-distribution.

such GOP spin. whichever way you receive CREDIT..it still remains the governments DEFICIT.

so why then, is it redistribution FROM the top, yet not TO the top?

fail..and for god's sakes will you PLEASE learn the signs?

 

[a senile fungus]

regular taxpayers are those >$250k..do you know how many taxpayers make >$25k? i've read his plan (what little there is) and it's a shell game..those >$25k account for a ton of tax dollars..how is he going to replace it?

can someone PLEASE teach him the signs before he makes more of a fool of himself?

The greater than sign, >, means greater than.

So, what taxpayers make is x. You said " regular taxpayers are those >$250k" which reads as regular taxpayers are those (who make) greater then 250k, mathematically written as x>$250,000.

So when x, which is what taxpayers make, has the larger side of the " ice cream cone / carrot" pointed towards it, then that means that x bigger than 250k.

Let me know if that helps.

 

[schuylaar]

The greater than sign, >, means greater than.

So, what taxpayers make is x. You said " regular taxpayers are those >$250k" which reads as regular taxpayers are those (who make) greater then 250k, mathematically written as x>$250,000.

So when x, which is what taxpayers make, has the larger side of the " ice cream cone / carrot" pointed towards it, then that means that x bigger than 250k.

Let me know if that helps.

since you posted this to me and not @analexcess..

the wide side is the greater than side ie..1<2.

2 is greater than 1.

let me know if there is further debate on this..i swear ONLY at RIU political..why were we saddled with all the burnouts and white supremists?

 

[NLXSK1]

The greater than sign, >, means greater than.

So, what taxpayers make is x. You said " regular taxpayers are those >$250k" which reads as regular taxpayers are those (who make) greater then 250k, mathematically written as x>$250,000.

So when x, which is what taxpayers make, has the larger side of the " ice cream cone / carrot" pointed towards it, then that means that x bigger than 250k.

Let me know if that helps.

You can keep trying. She is blonde.

 

[NLXSK1]

since you posted this to me and not @analexcess..

the wide side is the greater than side ie..1<2.

2 is greater than 1.

let me know if there is further debate on this..i swear ONLY at RIU political..why were we saddled with all the burnouts and white supremists?

What you put in there is a less than sign. They are not interchangeable. < = less than and > = greater than.

The formula you posted is that 1 is less than 2 which is correct. Of course what you wrote immediately afterwards was wrong again... LOL!!!!

If you want to say 2 is greater than 1 you need to use the greater than sign. So 2 > 1.

We learned this in 2nd grade, where were you?

 

[a senile fungus]

since you posted this to me and not @analexcess..

the wide side is the greater than side ie..1<2.

2 is greater than 1.

let me know if there is further debate on this..i swear ONLY at RIU political..why were we saddled with all the burnouts and white supremists?

There is no debate over this. Math is universal.

Schuy, do you remember when you told me that you were in medical school? Lol

 

[a senile fungus]

You can keep trying. She is blonde.

You are not often correct, this is a small victory for you.

Congratulations!

 

[NLXSK1]

There is no debate over this. Math is universal.

Schuy, do you remember when you told me that you were in medical school? Lol

Better than if she was in astro-physics. Although I dont recommend a job in the pharmacy field or you are going to have a hell of a lot of overdoses!!