bravedave
Well-Known Member
I would think that would be a deal breaker. Is the extra yield worth it?Plants grown totally under HPS yield more but take about 2 weeks longer to finish than those vegged under MH or CFL.
I would think that would be a deal breaker. Is the extra yield worth it?Plants grown totally under HPS yield more but take about 2 weeks longer to finish than those vegged under MH or CFL.
Honestly,it's been a while since ive used reptile bulbs, but im pretty sure i had to have them within 4-8" 2 hours a day to actually have the tops amber out faster but damn, the horti blue did the same thing at over a foot away probably because it was a permanent flower bulb at the time. Pretty sure ive got my reptiglo's and exos sitting around here somewhere they probably dont work anymore, but the hortilux blue was a total system replacement and a much better one imo. Where i live, the sun puts out a retarded amount of UV, 7-8 +/- being average, 11 on a hot day. yet some girls are much more frosty then the others outdoor. Forced maturity via single band UV-x/b is also something i wouldn't like to get into, it will just spark an argument, i will say though its got alot to do with genotypes/phenotypes.My status line once said: "I don't have much growing experience but my experience is growing". I figured there was still a UV danger with the tubes. No?' I did notice with my HPS run my finish time was longer also. Under MH the first 3 grows were like clockwork...70 days...With the HPS, it was 75 days when I started chopping and could have waited longer it seemed. Is that your experience?
Oh no I think you're wrong there! [/QUOTE][QUOTE="Forced maturity via single band UV-x/b is also something i wouldn't like to get into, it will just spark an argument, i will say though its got alot to do with genotypes/phenotypes.
If two weeks is a deal breaker you should run sog that way you don't waste any time at all.I would think that would be a deal breaker. Is the extra yield worth it?
70*5= 350If two weeks is a deal breaker you should run sog that way you don't waste any time at all.
I get a lb and a half a light. Does it? I've never used mh I can't really give you a yes or no answer on that one dave. I harvest the glue at day 63 most of the rest of the stuff I grow goes 9 to 10 weeks. That dude's fucking with you Dave the plant doesn't finish faster with mh.. that's crazy talk!70*5= 350
84*4=336
So in a calender year MH gets 5 harvests and the HPS gets 4.
Does the HPS outyield MH by 25%??
No sog planned but a scrog WILL happen someday.
Fuck no! Nobody gets grade A weed in less then 9 weeks using indica dominant strains grown in soil.. I've seen a few strains that say 6 to 7 weeks but i doubt it.. mh might degrade tricomes at a faster rate then HPS but tricomes are just one part of what you take into consideration when harvesting. I need to see it crown and stack. Swollen is what your looking for.. If it was all about tricomes outdoor growers would harvest at week 6.Is this true?
Just doing the math for you as you seemed to doubt the relevance of 14 days and actually @hotrodharley is rather reliable. You are kind of a moving target.I get a lb and a half a light. Does it? I've never used mh I can't really give you a yes or no answer on that one dave. I harvest the glue at day 63 most of the rest of the stuff I grow goes 9 to 10 weeks. That dude's fucking with you Dave the plant doesn't finish faster with mh.. that's crazy talk!
Seems to me that you say "Fuck No!" here and go on to argue against something that was never said. Thats rather convenient.Fuck no! Nobody gets grade A weed in less then 9 weeks using indica dominant strains grown in soil.. I've seen a few strains that say 6 to 7 weeks but i doubt it.. mh might degrade tricomes at a faster rate then HPS but tricomes are just one part of what you take into consideration when harvesting. I need to see it crown and stack. Swollen is what your looking for.. If it was all about tricomes outdoor growers would harvest at week 6.
Lol do your research before you open your mouth. You think I make you look bad dave, but you do that shit on your own. You are arguing over 2 extra weeks that don't exist I harvest everything probably before you do . 2 weeks dave I give you a solution that cuts out your entire veg time and you say no I'm not going to do that but look at the two weeks( that don't exist). You're much smarter when you shut the fuck up.Just doing the math for you as you seemed to doubt the relevance of 14 days and actually @hotrodharley is rather reliable. You are kind of a moving target.
It seems that way to you because you're a noob. Every real grower understands me. Some may not Like me to much but they definitely understand me. You can't Keep up with the conversation because you don't understand it yet.Seems to me that you say "Fuck No!" here and go on to argue against something that was never said. Thats rather convenient.
Take a Midol little yellow bird. I just was reacting to something that was actually said...you should try it sometimeLol do your research before you open your mouth. You think I make you look bad dave, but you do that shit on your own. You are arguing over 2 extra weeks that don't exist I harvest everything probably before you do . 2 weeks dave I give you a solution that cuts out your entire veg time and you say no I'm not going to do that but look at the two weeks( that don't exist). You're much smarter when you shut the fuck up.
No it isn't...Lol you fuckers... Im going home. Its hot in here
Sorry, sometimes I acknowledge the troll to see if he wants to morph into human form.Lol you fuckers... Im going home. Its hot in here
I found the smoke less potent but if yield is what you are after in a larger grow it would be worth it. I added MH and made my buds better. But the yield was no 25% larger with HPS alone. Whoever said that is off in my own experience.I would think that would be a deal breaker. Is the extra yield worth it?
The 25% more is what HPS would have to do to outperform MH yield-wise over the course of a year in the scenerio where HPS takes 14 days longer than MH.I found the smoke less potent but if yield is what you are after in a larger grow it would be worth it. I added MH and made my buds better. But the yield was no 25% larger with HPS alone. Whoever said that is off in my own experience.
In your experience, is the potency elevated with hps and mh lighting, combined?I found the smoke less potent but if yield is what you are after in a larger grow it would be worth it. I added MH and made my buds better. But the yield was no 25% larger with HPS alone. Whoever said that is off in my own experience.