Is it possible that NASA faked the moon landing?

Darth Vapour

Darth Vapour

Well-Known Member
tyler.durden said:
Liquid water on Mars??? What a hoax! I'm not sure Mars even exists, remember 9/11? Of coarse u don't, fuckin' amuricans...

http://www.iflscience.com/space/evidence-salty-water-flowing-mars

NASA Discovers Liquid Salty Water Flowing On Mars
September 28, 2015 | by Amy Lynn


Photo credit: These long streaks are inferred to have been formed by contemporary flowing water. NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

NASA teased us last week with the promise of a “major science finding” regarding our planetary neighbor, Mars. Today they delivered news of an exciting discovery – and no it’s not Mark Watney or even little green men. Using data collected by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), scientists have detected evidence of salty water flowing on the surface of Mars.

Water is one of the key ingredients for life as we know it. We’ve known for a while that Mars has frozen water at its poles, and earlier this year the Curiosity rover detected the possibility of salty water below the surface, but this is the first evidence for it flowing on the surface.

During the warm seasons, temperatures on the Red Planet reach about 250-300 Kelvins (-23 to 27 degrees Celsius, -10 to 80 degrees Fahrenheit) and in order for liquid water to survive (even temporarily) on the surface of Mars today, it would have to contain some salt. Both remote and in-situ investigations have shown that various salts, such as perchlorates, sulfates, and chlorides are present on the Martian surface. These salts can significantly lower both the freezing point and the evaporation rate of water, and also easily absorb moisture from the atmosphere.

Recurring slope lineae (RSL) – thin, dark streak-like gullies seen creeping down the sides of craters – have been spotted by MRO in low and mid-latitudes on the Red Planet. High-resolution images from MRO’s HiRISE camera show that the RSL are typically less than 5 meters (16 feet) wide, appear on slopes during the warmer months, lengthen and fade away during the cooler months. Scientists first proposed the idea that the RSL could be a product of seasonal water flows back in 2007, but there was no direct evidence to support that until now.

Spectral data from MRO’s Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for Mars instrument (CRISM) observed four different locations where the RSL are most extensive. The data showed evidence of three different hydrated salts – magnesium perchlorate, magnesium chlorate and sodium perchlorate – at all four locations, indicating that salty water (also called brine) flows are responsible for the RSL activity.



Image credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

Scientists now know that salty water flowing downhill is behind the RSL, but where does the water come from? There are a few possibilities, but researchers have yet to narrow it down. The water could form by the melting of surface or subsurface ice, but the likelihood of near-surface ice around the equatorial region is slim. Another possibility is the seasonal discharge of a local aquifer, but also unlikely. Since the salts have the potential to absorb moisture from the atmosphere through a process known as deliquescence, that could be another possibility.

Here on Earth, in the Atacama Desert, we know that the deliquescence of certain salts offers the only known refuge for active microbial communities. If RSL form as a result of deliquescence of perchlorate salts, they could have major astrobiological implications.

The findings have been published in Nature Geosciences and provide new insight into the current Martian hydrologic cycle.
Click to expand...
Its called SEMEN salty water lol
 
Darth Vapour

Darth Vapour

Well-Known Member
cannabineer said:
No stars is easily explained if you know anything about photography. A daylight photo with 100-speed film is done with f/2.8 and 1/500 shutter speed.
To see the brighter (mag 1 and better) stars, you need 10 entire seconds at that f-stop and film speed ... kids, sheesh
Click to expand...
interstesting lets look at felix jump please note the skys the blue space and what appears to be stars and other debris or what have you
lets not forget if its recorded on video and moon landings also in video as per them jumping around lol we should not worry to much about shutter speed now should we remember there 2 different things here
Remember:

  • Frame rate = How many individual frames are created each second.
  • Shutter speed = How long each individual frame is exposed for.
  • duh
 
curious2garden

curious2garden

Well-Known Mod
Staff member
Darth Vapour said:
interstesting lets look at felix jump please note the skys the blue space and what appears to be stars and other debris or what have you
lets not forget if its recorded on video and moon landings also in video as per them jumping around lol we should not worry to much about shutter speed now should we remember there 2 different things here
Remember:

  • Frame rate = How many individual frames are created each second.
  • Shutter speed = How long each individual frame is exposed for.
  • duh
Click to expand...
My internet hubby said to tell you he's on his way to bitch slap some hard science into the unfiltered masses. He'll put you on his honey-do list for bitch slapping later.
 
reddan1981

reddan1981

Well-Known Member
@Darth your thread title should have read; could NASA have faked the moon landing. The bodies of proof are weighted heavily in favour of the establishment, so it is a losing battle trying to debate its legitimacy. Your question could seem more viable when the origins of NASA is brought to light, then only a simpleton would suggest there is no validity to your assumption.
This is part of the American identity and cognitive dissonance will fight to keep this their reality. I know you are waking up brother, keep searching, understand the reason mate. I think that is the most important of all questions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top