injunction/court case updates

spider9

spider9

Well-Known Member
in 2011 canada post grabbed my meds and refused to give it back I lost it on them and told them no wonder people go postal they called the rcmp on me the cops showed up at my house and we had a long chat the cop told me the postmaster general had more power than the rcmp but said he would talk to them to see what he could do 3 days later my meds showed up at my post office shipped over night by canada post.
 
Last edited:
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
spider9 said:
in 2011 canada post grabbed my meds and refused to give it back I lost it on them and told them no wonder people go postal they called the rcmp on me the cops showed up at my house and we had a long chat the cop told me the postmaster general had more power than the rcmp but said he would talk to them to see what he could so 3 days later my meds showed up at my post office shipped over night by canada post.
Click to expand...
I know someone who lost theirs and they couldn't do anything...even a complaint to the RCMP did squat. she was told different stories from each department.....
her DG was a flake though and didn't know how to hide the smell..pure genius on his part. if he had packaged it correctly, that never would have happened. i told him about using a diaper genie..if that hides the smell of dirty diapers, it'll stop other smells too...but instead of using it the way I told him-tie both ends-he used a piece of tape...and not a long one, just a piece..oh yeah and squished the herb flat! i guess that was to cover up what a shitty job he did. when i scoped it, i saw all the bugs on it as well
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
torontoke said:
I know a guy that got raided and busted charged with manufacture traffic automatic guns u name it.
Cops and crown didnt show in court because of a bad snow and not only did they drop all charges and have to return most of his property but the judge also signed a letter for his lawyer to warn future cops about harassing his client.
Thats as crazy as it gets. Its my own buddy and i couldnt believe my eyes when i read the letter.
Cost him 45k but saved his ass
Click to expand...
45k well spent, damn.
 
bigmanc

bigmanc

Well-Known Member
well, i expired on march 1st 2014...maybe i can get others opinion?

The terms used in this exemption have the same meaning as they do in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) and its regulations, except as defined below:

"authorized person" means a person who

  1. "WAS" authorized to possess or produce marihuana under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) that were repealed on March 31, 2014; and
whats everyones take on this? speaks of no injunction or cut off date...wouldnt or shouldnt they say "IS" authorized ?

seems to me is if you have a pink paper your laughing. Might have been something HC had to do to give there buddys sec56s
 
G

gb123

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
well, i expired on march 1st 2014...maybe i can get others opinion?

The terms used in this exemption have the same meaning as they do in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) and its regulations, except as defined below:

"authorized person" means a person who

  1. "WAS" authorized to possess or produce marihuana under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) that were repealed on March 31, 2014; and
whats everyones take on this? speaks of no injunction or cut off date...wouldnt or shouldnt they say "IS" authorized ?

seems to me is if you have a pink paper your laughing. Might have been something HC had to do to give there buddys sec56s
Click to expand...
dude...grow some...end of story!
 
spider9

spider9

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
well, i expired on march 1st 2014...maybe i can get others opinion?

The terms used in this exemption have the same meaning as they do in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) and its regulations, except as defined below:

"authorized person" means a person who

  1. "WAS" authorized to possess or produce marihuana under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) that were repealed on March 31, 2014; and
whats everyones take on this? speaks of no injunction or cut off date...wouldnt or shouldnt they say "IS" authorized ?

seems to me is if you have a pink paper your laughing. Might have been something HC had to do to give there buddys sec56s
Click to expand...
I believe you have to also go with part "B" and meet both qualifications as there is no period between a & b it says and b so you must meet both IMO
 
G

gb123

Well-Known Member
it says you cannot use anything flammable to make oil... ya sure.... :lol:

  1. An authorized person must not use organic solvents when they are altering the chemical or physical properties of fresh or dried marihuana or a product described in paragraph (c) above.
 
WHATFG

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
bigmanc said:
well, i expired on march 1st 2014...maybe i can get others opinion?

The terms used in this exemption have the same meaning as they do in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) and its regulations, except as defined below:

"authorized person" means a person who

  1. "WAS" authorized to possess or produce marihuana under the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) that were repealed on March 31, 2014; and
whats everyones take on this? speaks of no injunction or cut off date...wouldnt or shouldnt they say "IS" authorized ?

seems to me is if you have a pink paper your laughing. Might have been something HC had to do to give there buddys sec56s
Click to expand...
Firstly, it I thought it was March 21, 2014 that the injunction came into effect and secondly, that is the date that you "was" supposed to have your pinks...it's like you may...but than again you may not...although a 56 exemption is what conroy said to get if you were left out....I have to read it again...I still don't believe it and I think Rona's going to pop out of the cake naked or something ewwww...
 
WHATFG

WHATFG

Well-Known Member
Marginal note:Possession of substance
  • 4. (1) Except as authorized under the regulations, no person shall possess a substance included in Schedule I, II or III.

  • Marginal note:Obtaining substance
    (2) No person shall seek or obtain
    • (a) a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV, or

    • (b) an authorization to obtain a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV
    from a practitioner, unless the person discloses to the practitioner particulars relating to the acquisition by the person of every substance in those Schedules, and of every authorization to obtain such substances, from any other practitioner within the preceding thirty days.

  • Marginal note:Punishment
    (3) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I
    • (a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding seven years; or

    • (b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable
      • (i) for a first offence, to a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months, or to both, and

      • (ii) for a subsequent offence, to a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or to both.

        Marginal note:Trafficking in substance
        • 5. (1) No person shall traffic in a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV or in any substance represented or held out by that person to be such a substance.

        • Marginal note:Possession for purpose of trafficking
          (2) No person shall, for the purpose of trafficking, possess a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV.

        • Marginal note:Punishment
          (3) Every person who contravenes subsection (1) or (2)
          • (a) subject to paragraph (a.1), if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I or II, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life, and
            • (i) to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of one year if
              • (A) the person committed the offence for the benefit of, at the direction of or in association with a criminal organization, as defined in subsection 467.1(1) of the Criminal Code,

              • (B) the person used or threatened to use violence in committing the offence,

              • (C) the person carried, used or threatened to use a weapon in committing the offence, or

              • (D) the person was convicted of a designated substance offence, or had served a term of imprisonment for a designated substance offence, within the previous 10 years, or
            • (ii) to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of two years if
              • (A) the person committed the offence in or near a school, on or near school grounds or in or near any other public place usually frequented by persons under the age of 18 years,

              • (B) the person committed the offence in a prison, as defined in section 2 of the Criminal Code, or on its grounds, or

              • (C) the person used the services of a person under the age of 18 years, or involved such a person, in committing the offence;
          • (a.1) if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule II in an amount that is not more than the amount set out for that substance in Schedule VII, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years less a day;

          • (b) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule III,
            • (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, or

            • (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months; and
          • (c) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule IV,
            • (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or

            • (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year.
        • (4) [Repealed, 2012, c. 1, s. 39]

        • Marginal note:Interpretation
          (5) For the purposes of applying subsection (3) in respect of an offence under subsection (1), a reference to a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV includes a reference to any substance represented or held out to be a substance included in that Schedule.

        • Marginal note:Interpretation
          (6) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(a.1) and Schedule VII, the amount of the substance means the entire amount of any mixture or substance, or the whole of any plant, that contains a detectable amount of the substance.


          Marginal note:Production of substance
          • 7. (1) Except as authorized under the regulations, no person shall produce a substance included in Schedule I, II, III or IV.

          • Marginal note:Punishment
            (2) Every person who contravenes subsection (1)
            • (a) if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule I, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of three years if any of the factors set out in subsection (3) apply and for a term of two years in any other case;

            • (a.1) if the subject matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule II, other than cannabis (marijuana), is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life, and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment
              • (i) for a term of one year if the production is for the purpose of trafficking, or

              • (ii) for a term of 18 months if the production is for the purpose of trafficking and any of the factors set out in subsection (3) apply;
            • (b) if the subject matter of the offence is cannabis (marijuana), is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 14 years, and to a minimum punishment of
              • (i) imprisonment for a term of six months if the number of plants produced is less than 201 and more than five, and the production is for the purpose of trafficking,

              • (ii) imprisonment for a term of nine months if the number of plants produced is less than 201 and more than five, the production is for the purpose of trafficking and any of the factors set out in subsection (3) apply,

              • (iii) imprisonment for a term of one year if the number of plants produced is more than 200 and less than 501,

              • (iv) imprisonment for a term of 18 months if the number of plants produced is more than 200 and less than 501 and any of the factors set out in subsection (3) apply,

              • (v) imprisonment for a term of two years if the number of plants produced is more than 500, or

              • (vi) imprisonment for a term of three years if the number of plants produced is more than 500 and any of the factors set out in subsection (3) apply;
            • (c) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule III,
              • (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years, or

              • (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding eighteen months; and
            • (d) where the subject-matter of the offence is a substance included in Schedule IV,
              • (i) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or

              • (ii) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year.
          • Marginal note:Factors
            (3) The following factors must be taken into account in applying paragraphs (2)(a) to (b):
            • (a) the person used real property that belongs to a third party in committing the offence;

            • (b) the production constituted a potential security, health or safety hazard to persons under the age of 18 years who were in the location where the offence was committed or in the immediate area;

            • (c) the production constituted a potential public safety hazard in a residential area; or

            • (d) the person set or placed a trap, device or other thing that is likely to cause death or bodily harm to another person in the location where the offence was committed or in the immediate area, or permitted such a trap, device or other thing to remain or be placed in that location or area.
          • 1996, c. 19, s. 7;
          • 2012, c. 1, s. 41.
          Previous Version

        And the NCR...

        8.1 A licensed dealer is authorized to have a narcotic in their possession for the purpose of exporting the narcotic from Canada if they have obtained the narcotic in accordance with these Regulations or the Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations.

        This is what you will exempt from if you do as you're told....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top