littlejacob
Well-Known Member
7103, member: 129132"]Wow very high intensity setup, nice work @Zheol ,much more light than a 1000W DE HPS in this canopy
@ttystikk
At full blast 1.4A
CXB3070 3K AD @ 1.4A = 49.8W @ 48% efficient = 23.9 PAR W
23.9 X 16 COBs = 382.5 PAR W
382.5 -10% losses to lens/reflector/scatter = 344.25 PAR W
344.25/16 ft² = 21.5 PAR W/ft²
21.5 X 4.66 umol/s/PAR W X 10.7 = 1072 PPFD.
Dimmed to .7A
CXB3070 3K AD @ .7A = 23.6W @ 55.4% efficient = 13.07 PAR W
13.07 X 16 COBs = 209.2 PAR W
209.2 -10% losses to lens/reflector/scatter = 188.3 PAR W
188.3/16 ft² = 11.77 PAR W/ft²
11.77 X 4.66 umol/s/PAR W X 10.7 = 587 PPFD.[/QUOTE]
Hey Master Supra! How efficient are the cxb 3590 @700mA? I know they are about 51% @1400mA! Is it 58%?¿
What is 100%, the sun?
Do you think it is possible to have more than 94% efficiency for a driver, is there 100% efficient driver
Better have one to know than hundred who looking for...
Thanks again★
@ttystikk
At full blast 1.4A
CXB3070 3K AD @ 1.4A = 49.8W @ 48% efficient = 23.9 PAR W
23.9 X 16 COBs = 382.5 PAR W
382.5 -10% losses to lens/reflector/scatter = 344.25 PAR W
344.25/16 ft² = 21.5 PAR W/ft²
21.5 X 4.66 umol/s/PAR W X 10.7 = 1072 PPFD.
Dimmed to .7A
CXB3070 3K AD @ .7A = 23.6W @ 55.4% efficient = 13.07 PAR W
13.07 X 16 COBs = 209.2 PAR W
209.2 -10% losses to lens/reflector/scatter = 188.3 PAR W
188.3/16 ft² = 11.77 PAR W/ft²
11.77 X 4.66 umol/s/PAR W X 10.7 = 587 PPFD.[/QUOTE]
Hey Master Supra! How efficient are the cxb 3590 @700mA? I know they are about 51% @1400mA! Is it 58%?¿
What is 100%, the sun?
Do you think it is possible to have more than 94% efficiency for a driver, is there 100% efficient driver
Better have one to know than hundred who looking for...
Thanks again★