Americans Favor Bush Over Obama

[ginwilly]

Intentionally leaving out information to favor your argument is not being accurate. Which is why I stated being both factual and accurate, is important.

That's fair, now are you trying to make a claim that one side is more altruistic than the other?

I will allow Fox is bad at this. That's one news outlet. MSNBC is also just one news outlet that is also bad at this.

Want some cherry picked data to prove one side is worse than the other? Pick which side you want and you can find that data.

 

[see4]

That's fair, now are you trying to make a claim that one side is more altruistic than the other?

I will allow Fox is bad at this. That's one news outlet. MSNBC is also just one news outlet that is also bad at this.

Want some cherry picked data to prove one side is worse than the other? Pick which side you want and you can find that data.

I prefer news straight from the source. AP, Reuters et al. I like NPR, BBC and nightly news. I enjoy Faux Noose when I need a good laugh. I enjoy The Daily Show and Real Time when I need a good laugh, but for difference reasons. But in general, I try to do my own research on topics that interest me.

That being said, by a wide margin, Faux viewers are the most uninformed people, more so than those who don't watch news at all. That's an achievement no other news organization, even MSNBC, can claim.

 

[ttystikk]

I prefer news straight from the source. AP, Reuters et al. I like NPR, BBC and nightly news. I enjoy Faux Noose when I need a good laugh. I enjoy The Daily Show and Real Time when I need a good laugh, but for difference reasons. But in general, I try to do my own research on topics that interest me.

That being said, by a wide margin, Faux viewers are the most uninformed people, more so than those who don't watch news at all. That's an achievement no other news organization, even MSNBC, can claim.

Check out Al Jazeera, you may find their reporting refreshing and insightful.

And MEANINGFUL. I don't see any other news organization covering the $15 and a union movement.

 

[ginwilly]

Check out Al Jazeera, you may find their reporting refreshing and insightful.

And MEANINGFUL. I don't see any other news organization covering the $15 and a union movement.

Nothing wrong with Al Jazeera as long as you understand they bought out ultral liberal Current TV owned by Gore and are owned and financed by the Qatar government which also finances and supports ISIS.

That doesn't mean there isn't a lot of good content on there, I have watched it some, it just means it's not exactly an unbiased source. It's a state run news channel by a state that's not exactly about truth and freedom.

I won't discount the fact there is some hard hitting journalism done by the outfit though. Like any other news outlet there is also agenda driven pieces.

NPR is the closest thing to unbiased in my eyes other than the opinion shows.

 

[see4]

Check out Al Jazeera, you may find their reporting refreshing and insightful.

And MEANINGFUL. I don't see any other news organization covering the $15 and a union movement.

Al Jazeera is interesting, I like their approach to news. Similar to VICE, which is now one of my main go-to sources of information.

 

[GOLDBERG71]

Prove it. You're stepping into a pool you will likely not be able to swim your way out of bud.

They polled 1000 people from other countries. Like Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela ect. Of course they'll favor Obama. They're all walking all over him. While increasing their power and political strength at OUR expense. What matters most is how are we better and what do we think. It's simple your savior has failed to deliver. You can reach and preach but the facts don't support it. Vetoing keystone pipeline only benefits other countries and won't prevent one bit of it from being used. But it will insure when it is used it will be by a country who doesn't give a flying F about the environment. More greenhouse gases will be released. Never mind it means the oil is traveling by train. Once again this has been proven to be more dangerous. Plus it's using fossil fuels to move fossils fuels. That's always great for the environment. If you guys really believed in a clean environment you should check your facts before preaching that as a positive.

 

[GOLDBERG71]

I'm checking out of this. There's no point to it. I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHOSE IDEA IT WAS THAT A VIDEO CAUSED BENGHAZI

 

[UncleBuck]

He's made us an embarrassment and just because he utters lies and you believe them. That poll isn't worth the ink it's wrote with. You've got to know who they polled.

they polled thousands of people in hundreds of countries around the world, dumbass.

obama brought us from being less respected than china to the most respected country in the world.

suck it, douche.

 

[UncleBuck]

So... This poll is righteous but the one that says Bush is more popular than Obama isn't? Why?

Because I agree with one and not the other.

no, because the poll comparing bush's popularity to obama's is comparing someone in office to someone out of office. every president's approval rating goes up once they are out of office.

it's a valid poll, it just doesn't compare the right thing to the right thing. if it did, it would compare both presidents at this same point 6.5 years into their presidencies, and note that obama is sitting at 50% approval rating while your hero was sitting at 29% approval rating at this point. dumbass.

you're an idiot. most klanmen are though.

 

[UncleBuck]

We are less respected and weaker under OBAMA!

it's the opposite, actually.

you are just dumb.

CAPS LOCK!

 

[ttystikk]

they polled thousands of people in hundreds of countries around the world, dumbass.

obama brought us from being less respected than china to the most respected country in the world.

suck it, douche.

Yet we are still hated and feared and drone strikes are creating a great deal of blowback we'll have to deal with sooner or later. Obama is popular, but it's not all laurels and roses.