Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

[Red1966]

Could you explain what you believe "my solution" is?

Your solution always seems to be the government sending you a check.

 

[UncleBuck]

It more the public pool concern but UB will probably weigh in as judging by his posts he seems to be the rollitup expert
not only on pedophilia but on gay bottom issues as well.

too stupid to figure out a sig quote, beenthere?

 

[UncleBuck]

You idiots have actually aknowleged that you PM each other to do precisely that.

the same way you and kynes message each other about your shitty spelling?

 

[Padawanbater2]

Your solution always seems to be the government sending you a check.

That's why nobody takes you seriously, including me

That's not my position at all, and you obfuscate what you believe my position to be whenever you can

 

[Rob Roy]

i didn't need to ask permission, i simply filled out the paperwork. there was nothing they could do to stop it.

 

[Red1966]

That's why nobody takes you seriously, including me

That's not my position at all, and you obfuscate what you believe my position to be whenever you can

That's always your position.

 

[desert dude]

 

[Rob Roy]

Idk, that's what I'm asking you, can you come up with something that would work that doesn't involve the government? I'm all ears

There has to be some kind of legal, documented proof/evidence, all these issues stem from the lack of it, so how do you suggest you legitimize such a process without the government? Many men have thought long and hard over these issues and they've all seemingly reached the same conclusion. In order for something to be legally recognized, there has to be an institution that provides that, and without that, legitimate recognition doesn't exist. Use the driver's license as an example, I could just say I'm a driver now, I know how to drive, whatever, but without the legal recognition of it by way of affirmation of passing the driving test, how would anyone know whether I'm qualified to operate a motor vehicle or not?

If it doesn't involve the government, then the involved parties can come up with something that works for THEM can't they?

There has to be something that the involved parties voluntarily agree to for it to be "legitimate". Illegitimacy is present when duress is there. You have it backwards.

Were slaves property or human beings before they were ahem "legitimately" assigned human status?

 

[UncleBuck]

If it doesn't involve the government, then the involved parties can come up with something that works for THEM can't they?

There has to be something that the involved parties voluntarily agree to for it to be "legitimate". Illegitimacy is present when duress is there. You have it backwards.

Were slaves property or human beings before they were ahem "legitimately" assigned human status?

government benefits do involve the government though.

does your wife know that you compare being married to her as a form of slavery?

does she know that you think paying children for sex should be totally legal?

 

[Rob Roy]

government benefits do involve the government though.

does your wife know that you compare being married to her as a form of slavery?

does she know that you think paying children for sex should be totally legal?

My relationship is very good, we both consented to it and really like it. Neither of us consent to asking permission of others to be in our relationship. Slaves had to get massa's permission to jump the broom though....nothing has changed for many people has it?

In fact when some modern cannon fodder slaves were drafted into the military it is very comparable to being "sold down the river".

Are you still upset because you sold yourself cheap to the badman?

 

[UncleBuck]

wow, he's still joking about pedophilia.

 

[Rob Roy]

wow, he's still joking about pedophilia.

Sir, when you can commit to a serious conversation and answer a few questions, I'd be happy to engage you in civil conversation.
Given your history, I won't hold my breath.

 

[abe supercro]

I'm here to learn more about gay psychology @Trousers.

Something has been brewing and i don't want to be perceived as being anti gay; However if there was a human resources department up in this bitch, I'd file a sexual harassment complaint about that particular gay individual.

Have you got anything to add trousers?

 

[UncleBuck]

Sir, when you can commit to a serious conversation and answer a few questions, I'd be happy to engage you in civil conversation.
Given your history, I won't hold my breath.

i can't have a serious conversation with someone who calls kicking black people out of stores based on their skin color an act of "indifference" and offering money to store owners in exchange for goods and services an "initiation of aggression".

once you realize that words have meanings and that children cannot consent to being paid for sex and that pedophilia is not a joke, we can talk.

until then, i am forced to point out what a racist pedophile you are.

 

[Rob Roy]

i can't have a serious conversation with someone who calls kicking black people out of stores based on their skin color an act of "indifference" and offering money to store owners in exchange for goods and services an "initiation of aggression".

once you realize that words have meanings and that children cannot consent to being paid for sex and that pedophilia is not a joke, we can talk.

until then, i am forced to point out what a racist pedophile you are.

In any kind of a peaceful offer to interact, for it to be valid, the option of refusing the interaction should be present, no?

 

[UncleBuck]

In any kind of a peaceful offer to interact, for it to be valid, the option of refusing the interaction should be present, no?

name one person who has been forced to open a store that serves the entire public and you will have a valid little argument there, princess.

 

[Rob Roy]

the same way you and kynes message each other about your shitty spelling?

You miss Kynes don't you?

 

[Harrekin]

You miss Kynes don't you?

I do miss him, this place shifted WAY too far to the left...

 

[Padawanbater2]

If it doesn't involve the government, then the involved parties can come up with something that works for THEM can't they?

What happens when said parties want to involve someone else, that might not include them?

 

[Rob Roy]

What happens when said parties want to involve someone else, that might not include them?

If the participants can all agree, agreement happens.