Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
That last asshole I posted just said he's willing to throw himself in a furnace before he accepts LGBT people as equal, in the name of Jesus, amen!
Go for it dude, I'll get the marshmallows
Big_Lou
Well-Known Member
Nah, I'm not getting my marshmallows or weenies (snicker) anywhere NEAR the burning corpse of that devil....tainted meat!That last asshole I posted just said he's willing to throw himself in a furnace before he accepts LGBT people as equal, in the name of Jesus, amen!
Go for it dude, I'll get the marshmallows
I was honestly more surprised that he didn't speak with a southern/midwestern accent. Go figure, eh?
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
A gay person has the right to determine the use of THEIR body. Nobody should tell them they don't or forcibly remove their right to determine that. I think we agree on that.
Gay people don't have the right to determine how others will use their bodies or property though, nobody does.
Could you tell me where you think gay people get the right to determine how others will use their property and be forced to serve them on an involuntary basis?
Doesn't it seem a little contradictory on the one hand believing gay people have a right to self determine, but then also thinking other people don't have that right?
Sounds unacceptable and like a double standard.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Your free market definition is wrong, in that it is incomplete and alludes to the idea that self governance isn't a governing factor.
In a free market, the transaction is governed by the people in it, not by an external forcibly intervening authoritarian entity. (coercion based government).
It means parties to a trade must be involved on mutual and peaceable basis and each leaves the trade satisfied or they can walk away from the interaction and seek that good or service elsewhere or not at all.
In a free market, the parties involved make the choices, not a "war lord(s)" with a government hat.
Rrog
Well-Known Member
Free Market = exploitation Always has been
Free market = minorities are exploited
Free market = women are exploited
Free Market = anyone not like you is exploited
It is not fair, free or balanced because humans naturally exploit the other. Simple rules can start to change that.
Free market = minorities are exploited
Free market = women are exploited
Free Market = anyone not like you is exploited
It is not fair, free or balanced because humans naturally exploit the other. Simple rules can start to change that.
Rob Roy
Well-Known Member
Except you're painfully wrong and may have confused a crony market with a free market. That is a common misconception.
In a free market, you have a choice to disengage if you can't reach mutual agreement with the other involved party.
In a free market a woman or a minority would be able to open a business without asking somebody else for permission.
In a free market, other people don't make your choices for you. That's why it's called a free market. In an unfree market (that which exists now) coercion is an acceptable means, which of course is unacceptable to any polite person.
