Hillary Clinton’s camp is FEARFUL of Bernie Sanders..

[Padawanbater2]

So I take it you got nothin...

You can assume I took the only poly-sci class in existence that had nothing to do with Marx if it helps you feel better, the question still stands.

In a Marxist utopia, how do we handle the floor shitter and the won't do, he covers the can't do well enough to exclude those.

I don't believe it productive to argue with someone who believes something that isn't the truth

Just like I wouldn't argue with someone that believes 2+2=5

 

[ginwilly]

Why is demand weak? Because most American consumers don’t have the purchasing power, as almost all of the gains have been going to the top 1 percent -- who spend only a fraction of what they earn. Repeat after me: The record inequality we're experiencing is bad for the economy."

While the inequality is certainly troubling and trending in the wrong direction, demand is weak because of a glut of labor. Off-shoring is a major reason for this.

I've seen you advocate for higher corporate taxes, do you think that will lead to an increase or decrease in companies moving offshore?
I've seen you advocate for increased regulation, do you think that will lead to an increase or decrease in competition?

 

[ginwilly]

I don't believe it productive to argue with someone who believes something that isn't the truth

Just like I wouldn't argue with someone that believes 2+2=5

So you got nothin...

I wasn't even asking for an argument, just asking you for a knowledge drop to a simple question that you are avoiding like the plague.

It's a question that's been asked by others here yet never answered. Name calling and ad homs is usually the go to instead.

It's cool though, my point was made, you won't answer it because you can't.

 

[UncleBuck]

... higher corporate taxes...increased regulation...

seriously, get something original.

 

[UncleBuck]

a simple question that you are avoiding like the plague.

why do you espouse a "neck down" evolution theory that comes from a book called "a troublesome inheritance" written by nicholas wade, who was interviewed by david duke and jared taylor about it, and which has been described as the most influential work of "scientific racism"?

it's a simple question i've been asking for months but you have never answered it.

 

[schuylaar]

why do you espouse a "neck down" evolution theory that comes from a book called "a troublesome inheritance" written by nicholas wade, who was interviewed by david duke and jared taylor about it, and which has been described as the most influential work of "scientific racism"?

it's a simple question i've been asking for months but you have never answered it.

he hounds everyone with nonsensical, gop talking points that have no depth.

then he disappears when you ask him a question.

 

[ginwilly]

he hounds everyone with nonsensical, gop talking points that have no depth.

then he disappears when you ask him a question.

We were discussing Marx's endgame, definitely not a gop talking point. We've also discussed the law of supply and demand which is older than the gop's existence. I mentioned off-shoring being a problem for the lack of demand for labor here in this country, that's definitely not a gop talking point. I DID mention that raising corporate taxes would increase off-shoring. I would say that's not a talking point but a business point. If you've followed along though, I believe corporate laws should be disbanded completely, is that a gop talking point? Hardly..

What question was asked that I ran away from? Was it from the floor shitter? I don't read his vile hateful stuff, life is too short.

Is this where you say again that you don't read my posts yet tell me everything you think I said?

 

[UncleBuck]

We were discussing Marx's endgame, definitely not a gop talking point. We've also discussed the law of supply and demand which is older than the gop's existence. I mentioned off-shoring being a problem for the lack of demand for labor here in this country, that's definitely not a gop talking point. I DID mention that raising corporate taxes would increase off-shoring. I would say that's not a talking point but a business point. If you've followed along though, I believe corporate laws should be disbanded completely, is that a gop talking point? Hardly..

What question was asked that I ran away from? Was it from the floor shitter? I don't read his vile hateful stuff, life is too short.

Is this where you say again that you don't read my posts yet tell me everything you think I said?

lol, meltdown.

 

[Padawanbater2]

So you got nothin...

I wasn't even asking for an argument, just asking you for a knowledge drop to a simple question that you are avoiding like the plague.

It's a question that's been asked by others here yet never answered. Name calling and ad homs is usually the go to instead.

It's cool though, my point was made, you won't answer it because you can't.

You're assuming and attributing a political philosophy to me I don't subscribe to

 

[Harrekin]

"As I make the rounds of college commencements, I wish I had better news. But here are the facts (courtesy of the Economic Policy Institute):

1. Young college graduates are still doing worse than young graduates were doing before the Great Recession. Their unemployment rate is now 7.2 percent (compared with 5.5 percent in 2007), and many are working in jobs that don’t require a college degree.

2. Their wages are 2.5% lower were the wages of young college grads in 2007.

3. Meanwhile, college costs have grown far more rapidly than family incomes -- forcing students to take out loans that, in this fragile labor market, are difficult to repay.

The problem isn’t that new college graduates lack the right education or skills. Most have what it takes. The problem is overall demand for goods and services in the U.S. economy remains perilously weak -- so employers don’t feel the need to do much hiring or to pay good wages.

Why is demand weak? Because most American consumers don’t have the purchasing power, as almost all of the gains have been going to the top 1 percent -- who spend only a fraction of what they earn. Repeat after me: The record inequality we're experiencing is bad for the economy."

If what youve said is noticeably true, won't a tipping point event be reached eventually?

 

[Wavels]

Well I am not alone in thinking that Bernie has virtually no chance to win the Dem nomination.
The fix is in; Clinton vs Bush is a very sad inevitability.
I find this to be deplorable and lamentable, but this is the current state of the depraved political reality of the USA!
....................................................................................................................................................................................
As the children’s book says: Voters, it’s time to “Go the F*k to sleep.” You can turn off Fox, MSNBC, and CNN; you can close Twitter; you can sign off your crazy uncle’s Facebook feed.

I am going to tell you, right now, what the political landscape of the future looks like so you don’t waste your time over the next year listening to a parade of pundits or watching those ridiculous primary debates. The 2016 election is going to come down to Hillary vs. Jeb, of course. Dynasty against dynasty. The campaign that would horrify our Founding Fathers and will bore everyone to tears.

How will this happen?



Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/05/2016-hillary-vs-jeb-118466.html#ixzz3bp96ICGx

 

[Wavels]

Bernie is on record as stating that too much choice for consumers is a problem.

Holy Macaroni.
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................


And so at his announcement the day after the Deodorant Manifesto, Bernie had his own to-make-an-omelet-you-have-to-break-some-eggs moment. As 5000 “working people,” very few of whom actually work, gathered on the banks of Lake Champlain to hear Sander Claus fulminate against the assorted outrages of the petit bourgeoisie, they were served free ice cream by none other than Ben & Jerry.

Ben & Jerry! Who has been more responsible for stress in the frozen-foods aisle than Ben & Jerry? Forget their sellout to the capitalist-roader running dogs of Unilever, what about their proliferation of flavors?

Just in a single category, Ben & Jerry offer regular chocolate, chocolate fudge brownie, chocolate peppermint crunch, New York super fudge chunk and now Boom Chocolatta. I don’t even have room to mention the stress produced by their multiple variations of vanilla, coffee and caramel.

Comrade Sanders, how many Ben & Jerry flavors do Americans need when there are children in this country who can’t even get jimmies on their sundaes?

It’s an outrage!

LOL!

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/columnists/howie_carr/2015/05/carr_bernie_sanders_raises_stink_over_deodorant_diversity

 

[UncleBuck]

the copy and paste queen strikes again!

 

[Wavels]

 

[UncleBuck]

that's cute, but please reconcile it with your constant support of republican candidates.

you may have the memory of a goldfish, but the rest of us don't, and neither does the internet.

dumbass.