Come watch crybabies cry about gay rights!

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Interesting little glimpse into that non-coercive ideal government of yours.. you'd have 10 year olds driving drunk behind the wheel as to "avoid coercion" from the government..

Give me a fuckin' break, Rob..

Your philosophy of "no coercion" hurts people
Click to expand...
Nope. I'd have the owner of the particular road determine the rules of it.

In a coercionless world the roads would not exist in the present mode.
 
CenkTripper

CenkTripper

Well-Known Member
Sex is a game, as long as two parties (or more :-) are happy playing, I see no problem, it all depends on your fantasies...

Marrying is a legal agreement between man (the slave) and woman (the blood sucker), mostly describing financial issues regarding looking after kids, property rights, free of charge sex. And no cheating, as long as you don't get caught like most women :-)

I am not against gay people, I think they are the brave ones. But I see no point in gay marriage with the current social systems around the world. If you want to feel secure in your relationship, you can sign an agreement on the issues you have, there is no obstacle in that...
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Was it a diabolical laugh while you rubbed your hands together first proclaiming it wasn't coercive then offering rationalizations for why coercion was necessary?
Click to expand...
No, it was because the idea of having different owners of different roads with different rules for, probably different drivers if the rest of your fairy tale got implemented, is one of the most retarded ideas I've ever read

If you can't see how that would be a catastrophe, not only for individuals but for every aspect of business there is, then you haven't given it much thought at all
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
No, it was because the idea of having different owners of different roads with different rules for, probably different drivers if the rest of your fairy tale got implemented, is one of the most retarded ideas I've ever read

If you can't see how that would be a catastrophe, not only for individuals but for every aspect of business there is, then you haven't given it much thought at all
Click to expand...

Oh, you mean like different states having different rules for roads they claim to own?



Flying cars could solve some personal transport issues, and yes, I've given this some thought.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Oh, you mean like different states having different rules for roads they claim to own?

Flying cars could solve some personal transport issues, and yes, I've given this some thought.
Click to expand...
The rules of the road are not subject to Leroy Jenkins from Tennessee's crazy idea of what should be legal on the roadway between states. There are federal guidelines states follow so you don't end up with lunatics driving down the opposite side of the roadway because said state said it's OK (like you would have on Leroy Jenkins roadway)
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
No, it was because the idea of having different owners of different roads with different rules for, probably different drivers if the rest of your fairy tale got implemented, is one of the most retarded ideas I've ever read

If you can't see how that would be a catastrophe, not only for individuals but for every aspect of business there is, then you haven't given it much thought at all
Click to expand...
So I take it you have never traveled on a toll road then?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
The rules of the road are not subject to Leroy Jenkins from Tennessee's crazy idea of what should be legal on the roadway between states. There are federal guidelines states follow so you don't end up with lunatics driving down the opposite side of the roadway because said state said it's OK (like you would have on Leroy Jenkins roadway)
Click to expand...
Federal guidelines aren't madatory. That's why they are "guidelines". Each state can have totaly different rules if they wish. They lose Federal Highway Funds, tho.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
So I take it you have never traveled on a toll road then?
Click to expand...
What prevents Mr. Jenkins from implementing left lane driving on the road he owns in RR's fairy tale? (not sure why I'm asking you since it's his fantasy, but I'd like to hear your reply either way)
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
What prevents Mr. Jenkins from implementing left lane driving on the road he owns in RR's fairy tale? (not sure why I'm asking you since it's his fantasy, but I'd like to hear your reply either way)
Click to expand...
Customers will not take his road due to the inconvenience and danger. The business will either go bankrupt or changes will be made. That's just simple business management. As long as a choice exists, customers will use the one that benefits them the most for their level of needs.

Would you keep going into a store that had employees that pointed at you, harassed you, laughed at you and were rude and demeaning to you every single time you went there?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Interesting little glimpse into that non-coercive ideal government of yours.. you'd have 10 year olds driving drunk behind the wheel as to "avoid coercion" from the government..

Give me a fuckin' break, Rob..

Your philosophy of "no coercion" hurts people
Click to expand...
in robrot's world those ten year olds can also consent to stuff. butt stuff.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Customers will not take his road due to the inconvenience and danger. The business will either go bankrupt or changes will be made. That's just simple business management. As long as a choice exists, customers will use the one that benefits them the most for their level of needs.

Would you keep going into a store that had employees that pointed at you, harassed you, laughed at you and were rude and demeaning to you every single time you went there?
Click to expand...
The "free market" doesn't always work to produce the best possible option. Without regulations, corporations that have enough money/power/influence skew the rules in their favor regardless of the consumer and, according to an earlier post by you, they're legally required to. So without a body of authority to enforce said regulations, what's stopping enormously profitable corporations from changing the rules in their favor, thereby effectively eliminating the free market?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
NoDrama said:
Customers will not take his road due to the inconvenience and danger. The business will either go bankrupt or changes will be made. That's just simple business management. As long as a choice exists, customers will use the one that benefits them the most for their level of needs.

Would you keep going into a store that had employees that pointed at you, harassed you, laughed at you and were rude and demeaning to you every single time you went there?
Click to expand...
your idea that the free market will solve all unpleasantness in the world is laughable, inane. historically refuted, and simply a piece of shit right wing talking point.



take a fucking history lesson and stop spamming your inane bullshit.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
your idea that the free market will solve all unpleasantness in the world is laughable, inane. historically refuted, and simply a piece of shit right wing talking point.



take a fucking history lesson and stop spamming your inane bullshit.
Click to expand...
I never said the free market would solve all problems.

You ever notice that you make huge assumptions, exaggerated claims, and can't help yourself but to create a strawman at every opportunity? What personality disorder is that called again?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top