Clone only strains

Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
TheHermit said:
I am pretty sure C99 was the result of several generations of backcrossing. Wouldn't the male pick up a lot of the mother's genetics through several generations?
Click to expand...
There are
mdjenks said:
This is the first cab I ever built, I sold it a long time ago.

Another pic of DHN's Purple Kush:

A top pic of the GC:

My kief press:
Click to expand...
Nice i just chopped mine:-)
Now off to Oregon;)
IMG_20150123_150408.jpg IMG_20150123_151106.jpg IMG_20150123_151116.jpg
 
Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
gitarre10000 said:
Got my 2 new clones today. Grape Ape and Purple Cadillac.
Popped them in some coco/perl.
Click to expand...
That is great! I am glade some one could take care of you. I will link up some good eads on breeding if you want. Let meget my grow taken down and harvest in jars first but i can point you in the right direction.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
Dr.D81 said:
Cubing is not a solid breeding practice AJ, and few breeders still do this anymore. With every bx you cut your chances of representing the mother by half.
Click to expand...
You sure about that? I'm thinking it's just the opposite. Every male that is slected in succesive gernerations will have a larger and larger percentage of the original females genetics. With every bx more of the mother will be represented.
 
Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
are sure about that? I'm thinking it's just the opposite. Every male that is slected in succesive gernerations will have a larger and larger percentage of the original females genetics. With every bx more of the mother will be represented.
Click to expand...
Yes very i am not saying it can not work but i will link up something ya'll need to read.


This is one of the links can add more if needed
cubing a myth
 
Last edited:
Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
IMO people do this as a way to turn a reasonable seed stock as fast as possible. That does not make it good practice. If you look at breeding off plants not mj there is a standard for stabilizing of a hybrid and it is not cubing.
 
st0wandgrow

st0wandgrow

Well-Known Member
Dr.D81 said:
IMO people do this as a way to turn a reasonable seed stock as fast as possible. That does not make it good practice. If you look at breeding off plants not mj there is a standard for stabilizing of a hybrid and it is not cubing.
Click to expand...
I really don't know much about it. It may not be the best way to breed per se, but wouldn't it give you the best chance to lock down a specific females characteristics in regular seed form? Each succesive backcross would carry with it more and more of the mothers genetics.

@Sativied knows his shit with this stuff. Maybe he can school us a bit......
 
Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
st0wandgrow said:
I really don't know much about it. It may not be the best way to breed per se, but wouldn't it give you the best chance to lock down a specific females characteristics in regular seed form? Each succesive backcross would carry with it more and more of the mothers genetics.

@Sativied knows his shit with this stuff. Maybe he can school us a bit......
Click to expand...
I think he ilb his
 
Joedank

Joedank

Well-Known Member
gunnar&carey said:
Im starting grape stomper its a clone only strain from denver gage green genetics made it Purple Elephant x Elite Seeds Chemdog Sour Diesel i think if i remember right
Click to expand...
grape stomper has the clone only strain "sour grapes" in it or so i am told.
sidenote : i trimmed a light dep of sour grape like five years ago . man do i remember it being SUPER greasy. wish i could run that one for seed...
 
Sativied

Sativied

Well-Known Member
Dr.D81 said:
Yes very i am not saying it can not work but i will link up something ya'll need to read.


This is one of the links can add more if needed
cubing a myth
Click to expand...
Fatfingering my tablet, so will keep it short: read my posts on the last page of that cubing a myth thread. :)

Although chimera already somewhat corrected himself, he didn't include the key info in his explanation, he is referring to plant (singular) where it has to be plants.
 
Dr.D81

Dr.D81

Well-Known Member
Sativied said:
Fatfingering my tablet, so will keep it short: read my posts on the last page of that cubing a myth thread. :)

Although chimera already somewhat corrected himself, he didn't include the key info in his explanation, he is referring to plant (singular) where it has to be plants.
Click to expand...
Nice i see you have a few at the end i will read them better tonight. i had went thought it a while back before your post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top