Skylor
Well-Known Member
His lawyer might have messed up as well, Its sounds the appeal court said more then once that
"Our review of this issue is for plain error affecting substantial rights because whether the Legislature’s definition of bona fide
physician-patient relationship was applicable was never raised in the trial court; therefore, it is
not preserved for appellate review."
His lawyer never argue the fact about bona fida relationship in the trial court
"Our review of this issue is for plain error affecting substantial rights because whether the Legislature’s definition of bona fide
physician-patient relationship was applicable was never raised in the trial court; therefore, it is
not preserved for appellate review."
His lawyer never argue the fact about bona fida relationship in the trial court