Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
There was a concerted effort by the republican party to diminish the RP momentum. This wasn't just on the Federal level. Our two party system has created a system where independent thought is discouraged and vilified. They were probably more scared of him than you guys are. He was a serious threat to status quo in DC and NEITHER party is willing to let that happen.

I really don't understand all the hate from a pot forum for the only guy running who wanted to legalize pot. What policies of his are people so afraid of that he as president, could actually get passed?

Look at what you've had to do to marginalize him. RP "hates civil rights". You know and everyone but the resident idiot knows that he stands for equality for all. His stringent idealism makes him point out the flaws in title II just as RobRoy has so eloquently explained. And you guys even call RR racist. It's either dishonestly or a complete lack of understanding.
Click to expand...
Think I would pass on any guy who wanted to be POTUS who is against the Civil Rights Act..Many many many others agree..Oh yeah Fuck Ron Paul.
 
DonAlejandroVega

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"We must therefore conclude that we are not anarchists." ~Murray Rothbard
Click to expand...
I heard about the whole lead paint chip history, and the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome......and I'm sorry, so look..............
separate.....my economic views......ya know......money an' stuff.........from my political views, and for that matter, my religious views, my views on individual matters as a whole, I dare say. I am a salad bar. you are head of lettuce. slam yourself into any mold, and affix any tag you wish, but you waste your time attempting it with me. if I had my way, economics would be how many bananas ant nuts were collected that day.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Think I would pass on any guy who wanted to be POTUS who is against the Civil Rights Act..Many many many others agree..Oh yeah Fuck Ron Paul.
Click to expand...
You keep repeated he's against civil rights, you need to back that up and I'll jump on the hate bandwagon with you. Otherwise, you are just being a bucktard repeating what you've heard.

I would use an actual policy stance of his that I didn't like instead of repeating something you have to twist to make even a little true. His "audit the fed" ruffled a lot of feathers, how bout that one? He thinks we shouldn't have a military presence in a bajillion different countries and wants to drastically reduce military. A lot of people take issue with that. He wants to stop locking up citizens for victimless crimes, maybe you don't like that one? After all, you voted for status quo and Bush III and Bush IV, there must be something you like about how things are going.
 
abandonconflict

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
‘One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, “our side,” had captured a crucial word from the enemy . . . “Libertarians” . . . had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over. . .'
~Murray Rothbard
Click to expand...
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
You keep repeated he's against civil rights, you need to back that up and I'll jump on the hate bandwagon with you. Otherwise, you are just being a bucktard repeating what you've heard.

I would use an actual policy stance of his that I didn't like instead of repeating something you have to twist to make even a little true. His "audit the fed" ruffled a lot of feathers, how bout that one? He thinks we shouldn't have a military presence in a bajillion different countries and wants to drastically reduce military. A lot of people take issue with that. He wants to stop locking up citizens for victimless crimes, maybe you don't like that one? After all, you voted for status quo and Bush III and Bush IV, there must be something you like about how things are going.
Click to expand...
You need to stop smoking weed if you are telling me that you have never heard Ron Paul stance against the Civil Righs Act. I suggest you do "the google". He also thinks the Civil War was not needed and that the South was right. If you don't know these things then you don't know Ron Paul.
 
ginwilly

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
You need to stop smoking weed if you are telling me that you have never heard Ron Paul stance against the Civil Righs Act. I suggest you do "the google". He also thinks the Civil War was not needed and that the South was right. If you don't know these things then you don't know Ron Paul.
Click to expand...
By the south being right, he said they had a right to secede, not that they were right to own slaves, he's against that.

His stance on the Civil Rights Act that you are attempting to twist was referring solely to title II. His stance on title II deals entirely with property rights, not racism.

Look what you had to turn it into to justify your hate. Surely you can name actual policy of his you don't support, hell I can. He was too rigid for my book and his ideology left no room for compromise thus, he wouldn't have been able to get much done.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
ginwilly said:
By the south being right, he said they had a right to secede, not that they were right to own slaves, he's against that.

His stance on the Civil Rights Act that you are attempting to twist was referring solely to title II. His stance on title II deals entirely with property rights, not racism.

Look what you had to turn it into to justify your hate. Surely you can name actual policy of his you don't support, hell I can. He was too rigid for my book and his ideology left no room for compromise thus, he wouldn't have been able to get much done.
Click to expand...
Ron Paul thought that the North should have paid to buy slaves from southern slave owners to avoid the war, rather than the South renouncing slavery. Paul also forgets it was the South who wanted to expand slavery. Paul also forgets to mention that the South income came from slavery. All central reasoning's for the Civil War.

Did you also know Ron Paul was the only member of congress to vote against honoring the Civil Rights Act Of 1964. How can you be for something when you vote against honoring it? FUCK RON PAUL
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
So segregation is freedom. L Rawn Pawl Hubbard said so.
Click to expand...
No freedom to associate on a consensual basis is freedom. That would include the freedom of some people to do things we might not do ourselves as long as their actions do not cause an actionable harm to others or infringe on their freedom to own themselves or their justly acquired property.


I had thought you were smarter than you have demonstrated lately. You used to at least address the points others made instead of taking the Uncle Gerbil route of conflating the arguments of others.

Oh, you still haven't told me what you think a person can and cannot own.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in the following maxim: that the fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate." ~Bertrand Russell
Click to expand...

How is a person seeking to not associate with another exerting tyranny? It would seem the person forcing the association is the one being tyrannical.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
abandonconflict said:
"Advocates of capitalism are very apt to appeal to the sacred principles of liberty, which are embodied in the following maxim: that the fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate." ~Bertrand Russell
Click to expand...

I advocate a free market, not crony capitalism. Let's not waste our time trying to combine the two okay?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top