Teacher fired for breaking up fight.

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Maybe I already earn about over 4 times the average wage due to our free education system?

I also know not to set my house on fire with my family asleep upstairs.

So win-win, the only thing that could make me win anymore would be calling you gay.
Maybe you're unemployed, too. Since you've never mentioned working anywhere, I think that is a safe assumption. Inserting a reference to a known lie kinda destroys your credibility. Sucks to you. "win-win"............lol..
 

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Because of his looks and the power of the two party system. Didn't he actually win a few states but the electoral votes were rewarded to Romney by the electoral college reps? I don't remember exactly because it mattered so little to me. I just remember seeing polls being reported by the news and RP never being mentioned even when he placed high.
Ron "I hate Civil Rights" Paul didn’t didn’t have the delegates necessary for nomination, not even if he’d had received all of the Maine delegates. Still was a state short guy. A plurality of the delegates in five states is needed to be entered in nomination per the rules of the GOP. This is nothing new.
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
yes, I believe a loose federal republic, based on property rights, and non-interference in the daily lives and transactions of its citizens would be a good step towards a stateless society of self-owning citizens.
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
Jefferson and Madison both wished to end slavery, and return African slaves to Africa, and to assist them in the founding of a constitutional republic; Liberia.
 

ginwilly

Well-Known Member
Ron "I hate Civil Rights" Paul didn’t didn’t have the delegates necessary for nomination, not even if he’d had received all of the Maine delegates. Still was a state short guy. A plurality of the delegates in five states is needed to be entered in nomination per the rules of the GOP. This is nothing new.
There was a concerted effort by the republican party to diminish the RP momentum. This wasn't just on the Federal level. Our two party system has created a system where independent thought is discouraged and vilified. They were probably more scared of him than you guys are. He was a serious threat to status quo in DC and NEITHER party is willing to let that happen.

I really don't understand all the hate from a pot forum for the only guy running who wanted to legalize pot. What policies of his are people so afraid of that he as president, could actually get passed?

Look at what you've had to do to marginalize him. RP "hates civil rights". You know and everyone but the resident idiot knows that he stands for equality for all. His stringent idealism makes him point out the flaws in title II just as RobRoy has so eloquently explained. While both say it loudly that they BELIEVE in civil rights, and you guys even call RR racist. It's either dishonestly or a complete lack of understanding.
 

abandonconflict

Well-Known Member
‘One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, “our side,” had captured a crucial word from the enemy . . . “Libertarians” . . . had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over. . .'
~Murray Rothbard
 

DonAlejandroVega

Well-Known Member
‘One gratifying aspect of our rise to some prominence is that, for the first time in my memory, we, “our side,” had captured a crucial word from the enemy . . . “Libertarians” . . . had long been simply a polite word for left-wing anarchists, that is for anti-private property anarchists, either of the communist or syndicalist variety. But now we had taken it over. . .'
~Murray Rothbard
no italics please........vertigo is on like Donkey Kong today. :(
 
Top