Red1966
Well-Known Member
Good for you. Very smart planning.
Administration Fears Obamacare So Flawed, It Could Bankrupt Insurance Companies
- Thread starter beenthere
- Start date
londonfog
Well-Known Member
You do realize that some where against ACA because of the lack of the single payer
have you ever heard of "platform"?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Stop lying. Insurance companies only get 15%. And all their operating costs including wages, rent or building expenses, supplies. commissions and EVERYTHING else come out of that. So your "20%" is more like "nearly nothing" or possibly even a loss.
canndo
Well-Known Member
More lies - when will you folks begin at least to adhere to the truth?
[President Obama] signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#6iAmqJpK2MrtCFzt.99
[President Obama] signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#6iAmqJpK2MrtCFzt.99
[President Obama] signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#sTwFDuExXH5XkDel.99
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#6iAmqJpK2MrtCFzt.99
[President Obama] signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#6iAmqJpK2MrtCFzt.99
[President Obama] signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#sTwFDuExXH5XkDel.99
This statement is false: President Obama signed no such executive order. On 14 April 2009, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im), an agency whose mission "is to assist in financing the export of U.S. goods and services to international markets," issued a preliminary approval for a $2 billion loan to Brazil's national oil company, Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras), to help fund offshore oil exploration and development.
The approval of the loan was an action undertaken not by officials who had been appointed by President Obama, but by his predecessor, President George W. Bush, as Ex-Im itself stated: The Bank's bipartisan Board unanimously approved the preliminary commitment to Petrobras on April 14, 2009, before any Obama appointees joined the Bank. In fact, at the time the Bank's Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush.
Despite the claim that the money committed to Petrobras is "taxpayer dollars," Ex-Im notes that "the vast majority of our financing consists of guarantees of loans made by commercial lenders," that "the bank is self-sustaining and does not receive any appropriated funds from Congress," and that "the Bank's activities do not cost the American taxpayer a dime."
Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp#sTwFDuExXH5XkDel.99
you didn't answer my question..you work for the IRS don't you..amiright?
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Provider lists were only published recently, and are extremely limited, inaccurate, and incomplete. Some areas have no providers of many services at all. Sadly, healthcare providers, health insurance exchanges, and the insurance companies are woefully unready for this, despite hundreds of millions of dollars being spent. It would help if we actually followed the law instead of letting Obama repeatedly and illegally rewriting the law for political purposes.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
He asked for your news sources, not your opinion.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
I seen many retractions from Fox. Lie no. 1. Ed Schultz is still working for MSNBC. Lie no. 2. Martin Bashir was not terminated, he quit. Lie no. 3. Bashir was voicing the script that was written for him by MSNBC. Lie no. 4.
1. ed schultz just recently returned to msnbc.
2. at mr. bashirs level you are given choices as an executive and he chose to leave with honor.
3. mr. bashir had writers to which he adds imput and it was his show.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Correct. It's all about ME.
I have not received a provider list. I selected to have everything mailed to me, because I figured there would be hundreds of pages. I prefer to have a hard copy.
At any rate, these are places like walgreens, which flat out said "we have no contracts with insurance companies aca policies"
IOW, "we don't take no stinking Obamacare."
One was a doctors office, did not file it. The other was a doctors office, which attempted to file, but was told that my insurance does not cover his services.
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Oh. so you DO watch Fox! Even the parts no one else ever watches. I'm not going to pretend I watch the credits, but I find it hard to believe they say "This is all lies and misinformation". Yes, that's right, I'm calling you a liar. I need a citation.so much so, THEY ROLL IT IN THE CREDITS..you should stick around for it
i'd be scared too if i worked for the IRS..i certainly wouldn't want RIU members to know either..you can tell me though..i'll keep your secret
Red1966
Well-Known Member
You can't understand the difference between 15% and 20%? Nor the difference between gross and net?
well with your IRS skill..enlighten me..
Red1966
Well-Known Member
Suffering memory lapses?
Similar threads
