Greengenes707
Well-Known Member
Anyone can disagree with me and my results...and gavitas results...and the botany communities results...if you have evidence showing otherwise. If not, that is just opinion. Mine and the scientific communities results are not opinions, they are real results, that are backing text theory.
If someone wants my excel file then I'll email it. RIU won't let me upload it.
800umols is good. 1000umols is better.
I have ran both low and high densities and compared them to my own ability...apple to apples.
So ask to others chiming in. What were you results with the other side of the field...
If you like 500...what happened at 800+?
If you like 800+...what happened at lower?
If you read the quotes from tags420 and gavita it clearly says "linear increase up to 1000umols."
The study I snap shot showed about a 10% increase from 675umols to 1000umols.
My results have been closer to 15-20% from 700 to 1000.
If someone wants my excel file then I'll email it. RIU won't let me upload it.
800umols is good. 1000umols is better.
I have ran both low and high densities and compared them to my own ability...apple to apples.
So ask to others chiming in. What were you results with the other side of the field...
If you like 500...what happened at 800+?
If you like 800+...what happened at lower?
If you read the quotes from tags420 and gavita it clearly says "linear increase up to 1000umols."
The study I snap shot showed about a 10% increase from 675umols to 1000umols.
My results have been closer to 15-20% from 700 to 1000.